Cargando…

Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of subjective risk perception is a matter of concern in breast cancer development. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-perceived risk assessment of breast cancer development and compared to actual risk in Iranian women. METHODS: The demographic,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah, Nikpour, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01238-z
_version_ 1783660781354614784
author Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah
Nikpour, Maryam
author_facet Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah
Nikpour, Maryam
author_sort Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The accuracy of subjective risk perception is a matter of concern in breast cancer development. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-perceived risk assessment of breast cancer development and compared to actual risk in Iranian women. METHODS: The demographic, clinical, and reproductive characteristics of 800 women aged 35–85 years were collected with an in-person interview. The self-perceived risk and the actual risk were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and he Gail model respectively. Gail’s cutoff of 1.66% risk was used to categorize the estimated 5-year actual risk as low/average risk (< 1.66%) and high risk (≥ 1.66). In low/average risk, if the self-perceived risk > actual risk, then individuals were considered as overestimating. Similarly, in high-risk women, if the perceived risk < actual risk, then, the subjects were labeled as under-estimate; otherwise, it was labeled as accurate. The Kappa statistics were used to determine the agreement between self-perceived risk and actual risk. ROC analysis was applied to determine the accuracy of self-perceived risk in the prediction of actual risk. RESULTS: The perceived risk was significantly higher than actual risk (p = 0.001, 0.01 for 5-year and lifetime risk respectively). Both in low and high-risk groups about half of the women over-estimate and underestimate the risk by subjective risk perception. For a 5-year risk assessment, there was no agreement between perceived risk and actual risk (Kappa = 0.00, p = 0.98) but a very low agreement between them in lifetime risk assessment (Kappa = 0.09, p = 0.005). The performance of accuracy of risk perception versus actual risk was very low (AUC = 0.53, 95% CI 0.44–0.61 and AUC = 0.58, 95% CI 0.54–0.62 for the 5-year risk and lifetime risk respectively). CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of risk perception based on VAS is very poor. Thus, the efforts of the public health education program should focus on the correct perception of breast cancer risk among Iranian women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79342352021-03-05 Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah Nikpour, Maryam BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The accuracy of subjective risk perception is a matter of concern in breast cancer development. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-perceived risk assessment of breast cancer development and compared to actual risk in Iranian women. METHODS: The demographic, clinical, and reproductive characteristics of 800 women aged 35–85 years were collected with an in-person interview. The self-perceived risk and the actual risk were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and he Gail model respectively. Gail’s cutoff of 1.66% risk was used to categorize the estimated 5-year actual risk as low/average risk (< 1.66%) and high risk (≥ 1.66). In low/average risk, if the self-perceived risk > actual risk, then individuals were considered as overestimating. Similarly, in high-risk women, if the perceived risk < actual risk, then, the subjects were labeled as under-estimate; otherwise, it was labeled as accurate. The Kappa statistics were used to determine the agreement between self-perceived risk and actual risk. ROC analysis was applied to determine the accuracy of self-perceived risk in the prediction of actual risk. RESULTS: The perceived risk was significantly higher than actual risk (p = 0.001, 0.01 for 5-year and lifetime risk respectively). Both in low and high-risk groups about half of the women over-estimate and underestimate the risk by subjective risk perception. For a 5-year risk assessment, there was no agreement between perceived risk and actual risk (Kappa = 0.00, p = 0.98) but a very low agreement between them in lifetime risk assessment (Kappa = 0.09, p = 0.005). The performance of accuracy of risk perception versus actual risk was very low (AUC = 0.53, 95% CI 0.44–0.61 and AUC = 0.58, 95% CI 0.54–0.62 for the 5-year risk and lifetime risk respectively). CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of risk perception based on VAS is very poor. Thus, the efforts of the public health education program should focus on the correct perception of breast cancer risk among Iranian women. BioMed Central 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7934235/ /pubmed/33663481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01238-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah
Nikpour, Maryam
Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women
title Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women
title_full Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women
title_fullStr Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women
title_short Accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in Iranian women
title_sort accuracy of self-perceived risk perception of breast cancer development in iranian women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01238-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hajiantilakikarimollah accuracyofselfperceivedriskperceptionofbreastcancerdevelopmentiniranianwomen
AT nikpourmaryam accuracyofselfperceivedriskperceptionofbreastcancerdevelopmentiniranianwomen