Cargando…

Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends vaccination rates of 75% against seasonal influenza for patients over 65 years old. In the 2013/2014 season, the German vaccination rates ranged between 14 and 65%. This study aimed to compare the attitudes, personal characteristics and vaccinatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arlt, Jonathan, Flaegel, Kristina, Goetz, Katja, Steinhaeuser, Jost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06177-x
_version_ 1783660816932798464
author Arlt, Jonathan
Flaegel, Kristina
Goetz, Katja
Steinhaeuser, Jost
author_facet Arlt, Jonathan
Flaegel, Kristina
Goetz, Katja
Steinhaeuser, Jost
author_sort Arlt, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends vaccination rates of 75% against seasonal influenza for patients over 65 years old. In the 2013/2014 season, the German vaccination rates ranged between 14 and 65%. This study aimed to compare the attitudes, personal characteristics and vaccination behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) in regions with high and low vaccination rates in Germany. METHODS: In May 2016, a questionnaire was sent to 1594 GPs practising in 16 districts with the highest and the lowest vaccination rates in Western and Eastern Germany as described by the Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany for the 2013/2014 season. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analyses were computed to identify potential factors associated with high vaccination rates. RESULTS: A total response rate of 32% (515/1594 participants) was observed in the study. GPs reported their attitudes towards vaccination in general and vaccination against influenza as mostly ‘very positive’ (80%, n = 352 and 65%, n = 288, respectively). GPs practising in regions with low vaccination rates reported their attitudes towards vaccinations in general (p = 0.004) and towards influenza vaccination (p = 0.001) more negatively than their colleagues from regions with high vaccination rates. Multiple logistic regression identified an increasing influence of year-dependent changing efficiency on GPs’ influenza rates as the strongest factor for predicting GPs from highly vaccinating regions (OR = 4.31 [1.12–16.60]), followed by the patient’s vaccination refusal despite GP advice due to already receiving a vaccination from another physician (OR = 3.20 [1.89–5.43]) and vaccination information gathering through medical colleagues (OR = 2.26 [1.19–4.29]). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest a correlation between GPs’ attitudes and regional vaccination rates. Beneath GPs’ individual attitudes, the regional attitude patterns of patients, colleagues and medical assistants surrounding those GPs seem decisive and should be integrated into future campaigns to increase vaccination rates at a regional level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06177-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79344512021-03-08 Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study Arlt, Jonathan Flaegel, Kristina Goetz, Katja Steinhaeuser, Jost BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends vaccination rates of 75% against seasonal influenza for patients over 65 years old. In the 2013/2014 season, the German vaccination rates ranged between 14 and 65%. This study aimed to compare the attitudes, personal characteristics and vaccination behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) in regions with high and low vaccination rates in Germany. METHODS: In May 2016, a questionnaire was sent to 1594 GPs practising in 16 districts with the highest and the lowest vaccination rates in Western and Eastern Germany as described by the Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany for the 2013/2014 season. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analyses were computed to identify potential factors associated with high vaccination rates. RESULTS: A total response rate of 32% (515/1594 participants) was observed in the study. GPs reported their attitudes towards vaccination in general and vaccination against influenza as mostly ‘very positive’ (80%, n = 352 and 65%, n = 288, respectively). GPs practising in regions with low vaccination rates reported their attitudes towards vaccinations in general (p = 0.004) and towards influenza vaccination (p = 0.001) more negatively than their colleagues from regions with high vaccination rates. Multiple logistic regression identified an increasing influence of year-dependent changing efficiency on GPs’ influenza rates as the strongest factor for predicting GPs from highly vaccinating regions (OR = 4.31 [1.12–16.60]), followed by the patient’s vaccination refusal despite GP advice due to already receiving a vaccination from another physician (OR = 3.20 [1.89–5.43]) and vaccination information gathering through medical colleagues (OR = 2.26 [1.19–4.29]). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest a correlation between GPs’ attitudes and regional vaccination rates. Beneath GPs’ individual attitudes, the regional attitude patterns of patients, colleagues and medical assistants surrounding those GPs seem decisive and should be integrated into future campaigns to increase vaccination rates at a regional level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06177-x. BioMed Central 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7934451/ /pubmed/33663449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06177-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arlt, Jonathan
Flaegel, Kristina
Goetz, Katja
Steinhaeuser, Jost
Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study
title Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study
title_full Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study
title_short Regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study
title_sort regional differences in general practitioners’ behaviours regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06177-x
work_keys_str_mv AT arltjonathan regionaldifferencesingeneralpractitionersbehavioursregardinginfluenzavaccinationacrosssectionalstudy
AT flaegelkristina regionaldifferencesingeneralpractitionersbehavioursregardinginfluenzavaccinationacrosssectionalstudy
AT goetzkatja regionaldifferencesingeneralpractitionersbehavioursregardinginfluenzavaccinationacrosssectionalstudy
AT steinhaeuserjost regionaldifferencesingeneralpractitionersbehavioursregardinginfluenzavaccinationacrosssectionalstudy