Cargando…

Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND: To compare 6 month outcomes of bleb needling performed in the clinic vs. the operating room (OR) in adult glaucoma patients with failed bleb. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 47 eyes from 41 glaucoma patients who received needling with mitomycin C (MMC) of scarred bleb from prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ponnusamy, Vikram, Nguyen, Van, An, Jella A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01870-1
_version_ 1783660824497225728
author Ponnusamy, Vikram
Nguyen, Van
An, Jella A.
author_facet Ponnusamy, Vikram
Nguyen, Van
An, Jella A.
author_sort Ponnusamy, Vikram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare 6 month outcomes of bleb needling performed in the clinic vs. the operating room (OR) in adult glaucoma patients with failed bleb. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 47 eyes from 41 glaucoma patients who received needling with mitomycin C (MMC) of scarred bleb from prior bleb-forming procedures in clinic (32 eyes) vs. the OR (15 eyes), including trabeculectomy (14 eyes), ExPress shunt (16 eyes), and ab-interno XEN gel stent (17 eyes). The primary outcome was needling success, defined as IOP ≤ 18 mmHg on 0 glaucoma medications without requiring an additional IOP lowering procedure within 6 months after needling. RESULTS: At 6 months, bleb needling success rate was similar when performed in the clinic vs. in the OR (28% vs. 20%, P = 0.54). Success rate was not statistically different in patients with prior trabeculectomy, ExPress shunt, and XEN gel stent (29% vs. 38% vs. 12%, P = 0.26). When comparing clinic vs. the OR needling procedures at 6 months, there was no difference in mean IOP (14.2 vs. 14.9 mmHg, P = 0.73), mean glaucoma medications (1.4 vs. 1.7, P = 0.69), additional IOP-lowering procedure rate (16% vs. 27%, P = 0.37), or complication rate (0% vs. 7%, P = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Bleb needling with MMC in clinic may be a safe and effective way to revise failed bleb after trabeculectomy, ExPress shunt, and XEN gel stent procedures when compared to needling in the OR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-01870-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79344882021-03-08 Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series Ponnusamy, Vikram Nguyen, Van An, Jella A. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare 6 month outcomes of bleb needling performed in the clinic vs. the operating room (OR) in adult glaucoma patients with failed bleb. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 47 eyes from 41 glaucoma patients who received needling with mitomycin C (MMC) of scarred bleb from prior bleb-forming procedures in clinic (32 eyes) vs. the OR (15 eyes), including trabeculectomy (14 eyes), ExPress shunt (16 eyes), and ab-interno XEN gel stent (17 eyes). The primary outcome was needling success, defined as IOP ≤ 18 mmHg on 0 glaucoma medications without requiring an additional IOP lowering procedure within 6 months after needling. RESULTS: At 6 months, bleb needling success rate was similar when performed in the clinic vs. in the OR (28% vs. 20%, P = 0.54). Success rate was not statistically different in patients with prior trabeculectomy, ExPress shunt, and XEN gel stent (29% vs. 38% vs. 12%, P = 0.26). When comparing clinic vs. the OR needling procedures at 6 months, there was no difference in mean IOP (14.2 vs. 14.9 mmHg, P = 0.73), mean glaucoma medications (1.4 vs. 1.7, P = 0.69), additional IOP-lowering procedure rate (16% vs. 27%, P = 0.37), or complication rate (0% vs. 7%, P = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Bleb needling with MMC in clinic may be a safe and effective way to revise failed bleb after trabeculectomy, ExPress shunt, and XEN gel stent procedures when compared to needling in the OR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-01870-1. BioMed Central 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7934488/ /pubmed/33663403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01870-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ponnusamy, Vikram
Nguyen, Van
An, Jella A.
Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series
title Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series
title_full Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series
title_fullStr Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series
title_full_unstemmed Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series
title_short Comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series
title_sort comparative outcome analysis of bleb needling of fibrotic blebs in the clinic versus the operating room: a retrospective case series
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01870-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ponnusamyvikram comparativeoutcomeanalysisofblebneedlingoffibroticblebsintheclinicversustheoperatingroomaretrospectivecaseseries
AT nguyenvan comparativeoutcomeanalysisofblebneedlingoffibroticblebsintheclinicversustheoperatingroomaretrospectivecaseseries
AT anjellaa comparativeoutcomeanalysisofblebneedlingoffibroticblebsintheclinicversustheoperatingroomaretrospectivecaseseries