Cargando…

Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute

BACKGROUND: Heterotrophic single-cell oils (SCOs) are one potential replacement to lipid-derived biofuels sourced from first-generation crops such as palm oil. However, despite a large experimental research effort in this area, there are only a handful of techno-economic modelling publications. As s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karamerou, Eleni E., Parsons, Sophie, McManus, Marcelle C., Chuck, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01911-3
_version_ 1783660831841452032
author Karamerou, Eleni E.
Parsons, Sophie
McManus, Marcelle C.
Chuck, Christopher J.
author_facet Karamerou, Eleni E.
Parsons, Sophie
McManus, Marcelle C.
Chuck, Christopher J.
author_sort Karamerou, Eleni E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heterotrophic single-cell oils (SCOs) are one potential replacement to lipid-derived biofuels sourced from first-generation crops such as palm oil. However, despite a large experimental research effort in this area, there are only a handful of techno-economic modelling publications. As such, there is little understanding of whether SCOs are, or could ever be, a potential competitive replacement. To help address this question, we designed a detailed model that coupled a hypothetical heterotroph (using the very best possible biological lipid production) with the largest and most efficient chemical plant design possible. RESULTS: Our base case gave a lipid selling price of $1.81/kg for ~ 8,000 tonnes/year production, that could be reduced to $1.20/kg on increasing production to ~ 48,000 tonnes of lipid a year. A range of scenarios to further reduce this cost were then assessed, including using a thermotolerant strain (reducing the cost from $1.20 to $1.15/kg), zero-cost electricity ($ 1.12/kg), using non-sterile conditions ($1.19/kg), wet extraction of lipids ($1.16/kg), continuous production of extracellular lipid ($0.99/kg) and selling the whole yeast cell, including recovering value for the protein and carbohydrate ($0.81/kg). If co-products were produced alongside the lipid then the price could be effectively reduced to $0, depending on the amount of carbon funnelled away from lipid production, as long as the co-product could be sold in excess of $1/kg. CONCLUSIONS: The model presented here represents an ideal case that which while not achievable in reality, importantly would not be able to be improved on, irrespective of the scientific advances in this area. From the scenarios explored, it is possible to produce lower cost SCOs, but research must start to be applied in three key areas, firstly designing products where the whole cell is used. Secondly, further work on the product systems that produce lipids extracellularly in a continuous processing methodology or finally that create an effective biorefinery designed to produce a low molecular weight, bulk chemical, alongside the lipid. All other research areas will only ever give incremental gains rather than leading towards an economically competitive, sustainable, microbial oil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79345232021-03-08 Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute Karamerou, Eleni E. Parsons, Sophie McManus, Marcelle C. Chuck, Christopher J. Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Heterotrophic single-cell oils (SCOs) are one potential replacement to lipid-derived biofuels sourced from first-generation crops such as palm oil. However, despite a large experimental research effort in this area, there are only a handful of techno-economic modelling publications. As such, there is little understanding of whether SCOs are, or could ever be, a potential competitive replacement. To help address this question, we designed a detailed model that coupled a hypothetical heterotroph (using the very best possible biological lipid production) with the largest and most efficient chemical plant design possible. RESULTS: Our base case gave a lipid selling price of $1.81/kg for ~ 8,000 tonnes/year production, that could be reduced to $1.20/kg on increasing production to ~ 48,000 tonnes of lipid a year. A range of scenarios to further reduce this cost were then assessed, including using a thermotolerant strain (reducing the cost from $1.20 to $1.15/kg), zero-cost electricity ($ 1.12/kg), using non-sterile conditions ($1.19/kg), wet extraction of lipids ($1.16/kg), continuous production of extracellular lipid ($0.99/kg) and selling the whole yeast cell, including recovering value for the protein and carbohydrate ($0.81/kg). If co-products were produced alongside the lipid then the price could be effectively reduced to $0, depending on the amount of carbon funnelled away from lipid production, as long as the co-product could be sold in excess of $1/kg. CONCLUSIONS: The model presented here represents an ideal case that which while not achievable in reality, importantly would not be able to be improved on, irrespective of the scientific advances in this area. From the scenarios explored, it is possible to produce lower cost SCOs, but research must start to be applied in three key areas, firstly designing products where the whole cell is used. Secondly, further work on the product systems that produce lipids extracellularly in a continuous processing methodology or finally that create an effective biorefinery designed to produce a low molecular weight, bulk chemical, alongside the lipid. All other research areas will only ever give incremental gains rather than leading towards an economically competitive, sustainable, microbial oil. BioMed Central 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7934523/ /pubmed/33663577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01911-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Karamerou, Eleni E.
Parsons, Sophie
McManus, Marcelle C.
Chuck, Christopher J.
Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute
title Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute
title_full Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute
title_fullStr Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute
title_full_unstemmed Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute
title_short Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute
title_sort using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01911-3
work_keys_str_mv AT karamerouelenie usingtechnoeconomicmodellingtodeterminetheminimumcostpossibleforamicrobialpalmoilsubstitute
AT parsonssophie usingtechnoeconomicmodellingtodeterminetheminimumcostpossibleforamicrobialpalmoilsubstitute
AT mcmanusmarcellec usingtechnoeconomicmodellingtodeterminetheminimumcostpossibleforamicrobialpalmoilsubstitute
AT chuckchristopherj usingtechnoeconomicmodellingtodeterminetheminimumcostpossibleforamicrobialpalmoilsubstitute