Cargando…

Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons)

BACKGROUND: Herbivorous mammals co-opt microbes to derive energy and nutrients from diets that are recalcitrant to host enzymes. Recent research has found that captive management—an important conservation tool for many species—can alter the gut microbiota of mammals. Such changes could negatively im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eisenhofer, Raphael, Helgen, Kristofer M., Taggart, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00068-y
_version_ 1783660835730620416
author Eisenhofer, Raphael
Helgen, Kristofer M.
Taggart, David
author_facet Eisenhofer, Raphael
Helgen, Kristofer M.
Taggart, David
author_sort Eisenhofer, Raphael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Herbivorous mammals co-opt microbes to derive energy and nutrients from diets that are recalcitrant to host enzymes. Recent research has found that captive management—an important conservation tool for many species—can alter the gut microbiota of mammals. Such changes could negatively impact the ability of herbivorous mammals to derive energy from their native diets, and ultimately reduce host fitness. To date, nothing is known of how captivity influences the gut microbiota of the Southern Hairy-nosed Wombat (SHNW), a large herbivorous marsupial that inhabits South Australia. Here, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized the faecal microbiota of SHNWs in captivity and from three wild populations, two from degraded habitats and one from an intact native grass habitat. RESULTS: We found that captive SHNWs had gut microbiota that were compositionally different and less diverse compared to wild SHNWs. There were major differences in gut microbiota community membership between captive and wild animals, both in statistically significant changes in relative abundance of microbes, and in the presence/absence of microbes. We also observed differences in microbial composition between wild populations, with the largest difference associated with native vs. degraded habitat. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that captivity has a major impact on the gut microbiota of SHNWs, and that different wild populations harbour distinct microbial compositions. Such findings warrant further work to determine what impacts these changes have on the fitness of SHNWs, and whether they could be manipulated to improve future management of the species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-020-00068-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79345412021-03-09 Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons) Eisenhofer, Raphael Helgen, Kristofer M. Taggart, David Anim Microbiome Research Article BACKGROUND: Herbivorous mammals co-opt microbes to derive energy and nutrients from diets that are recalcitrant to host enzymes. Recent research has found that captive management—an important conservation tool for many species—can alter the gut microbiota of mammals. Such changes could negatively impact the ability of herbivorous mammals to derive energy from their native diets, and ultimately reduce host fitness. To date, nothing is known of how captivity influences the gut microbiota of the Southern Hairy-nosed Wombat (SHNW), a large herbivorous marsupial that inhabits South Australia. Here, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized the faecal microbiota of SHNWs in captivity and from three wild populations, two from degraded habitats and one from an intact native grass habitat. RESULTS: We found that captive SHNWs had gut microbiota that were compositionally different and less diverse compared to wild SHNWs. There were major differences in gut microbiota community membership between captive and wild animals, both in statistically significant changes in relative abundance of microbes, and in the presence/absence of microbes. We also observed differences in microbial composition between wild populations, with the largest difference associated with native vs. degraded habitat. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that captivity has a major impact on the gut microbiota of SHNWs, and that different wild populations harbour distinct microbial compositions. Such findings warrant further work to determine what impacts these changes have on the fitness of SHNWs, and whether they could be manipulated to improve future management of the species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-020-00068-y. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7934541/ /pubmed/33499985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00068-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eisenhofer, Raphael
Helgen, Kristofer M.
Taggart, David
Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons)
title Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons)
title_full Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons)
title_fullStr Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons)
title_full_unstemmed Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons)
title_short Signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons)
title_sort signatures of landscape and captivity in the gut microbiota of southern hairy-nosed wombats (lasiorhinus latifrons)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00068-y
work_keys_str_mv AT eisenhoferraphael signaturesoflandscapeandcaptivityinthegutmicrobiotaofsouthernhairynosedwombatslasiorhinuslatifrons
AT helgenkristoferm signaturesoflandscapeandcaptivityinthegutmicrobiotaofsouthernhairynosedwombatslasiorhinuslatifrons
AT taggartdavid signaturesoflandscapeandcaptivityinthegutmicrobiotaofsouthernhairynosedwombatslasiorhinuslatifrons