Cargando…

Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol

INTRODUCTION: In situ simulation (ISS) consists of performing a simulation in the everyday working environment with the usual team members. The feasibility of ISS in emergency medicine is an important research question, because ISS offers the possibility for repetitive, regular simulation training c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truchot, Jennifer, Boucher, Valérie, Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane, Malo, Christian, Brassard, Éric, Marcotte, Jean, Martel, Guillaume, Côté, Geneviève, Garneau, Christian, Bouchard, Gino, Emond, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040360
_version_ 1783660873008545792
author Truchot, Jennifer
Boucher, Valérie
Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane
Malo, Christian
Brassard, Éric
Marcotte, Jean
Martel, Guillaume
Côté, Geneviève
Garneau, Christian
Bouchard, Gino
Emond, Marcel
author_facet Truchot, Jennifer
Boucher, Valérie
Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane
Malo, Christian
Brassard, Éric
Marcotte, Jean
Martel, Guillaume
Côté, Geneviève
Garneau, Christian
Bouchard, Gino
Emond, Marcel
author_sort Truchot, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In situ simulation (ISS) consists of performing a simulation in the everyday working environment with the usual team members. The feasibility of ISS in emergency medicine is an important research question, because ISS offers the possibility for repetitive, regular simulation training consistent with specific local needs. However, ISS also raises the issue of safety, since it might negatively impact the care of other patients in the emergency department (ED). Our hypothesis is that ISS in an academic high-volume ED is feasible, safe and associated with benefits for both staff and patients. METHODS: A mixed-method, including a qualitative method for the assessment of feasibility and acceptability and a quantitative method for the assessment of patients’ safety and participants’ psychosocial risks, will be used in this study. Two distinct phases are planned in the ED of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval (Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus) between March 2021 and October 2021. Phase 1: an ISS programme will be implemented with selected ED professionals to assess its acceptability and safety and prove the validity of our educational concept. The number of cancelled sessions and the reasons for cancellation will be collected to establish feasibility criteria. Semistructured interviews will evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. We will compare unannounced and announced ISS. Phase 2: the impact of the ISS programme will be measured with validated questionnaires for the assessment of psychosocial risks, self-confidence and perceived stress among nonselected ED professionals, with comparison between those exposed to ISS and those that were not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research ethics board has approved this protocol (#2020–5000). Results will be presented to key professionals from our institution to improve patient safety. We also aim to publish our results in peer-reviewed journals and will submit abstracts to international conferences to disseminate our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79347322021-03-19 Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Malo, Christian Brassard, Éric Marcotte, Jean Martel, Guillaume Côté, Geneviève Garneau, Christian Bouchard, Gino Emond, Marcel BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: In situ simulation (ISS) consists of performing a simulation in the everyday working environment with the usual team members. The feasibility of ISS in emergency medicine is an important research question, because ISS offers the possibility for repetitive, regular simulation training consistent with specific local needs. However, ISS also raises the issue of safety, since it might negatively impact the care of other patients in the emergency department (ED). Our hypothesis is that ISS in an academic high-volume ED is feasible, safe and associated with benefits for both staff and patients. METHODS: A mixed-method, including a qualitative method for the assessment of feasibility and acceptability and a quantitative method for the assessment of patients’ safety and participants’ psychosocial risks, will be used in this study. Two distinct phases are planned in the ED of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval (Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus) between March 2021 and October 2021. Phase 1: an ISS programme will be implemented with selected ED professionals to assess its acceptability and safety and prove the validity of our educational concept. The number of cancelled sessions and the reasons for cancellation will be collected to establish feasibility criteria. Semistructured interviews will evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. We will compare unannounced and announced ISS. Phase 2: the impact of the ISS programme will be measured with validated questionnaires for the assessment of psychosocial risks, self-confidence and perceived stress among nonselected ED professionals, with comparison between those exposed to ISS and those that were not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research ethics board has approved this protocol (#2020–5000). Results will be presented to key professionals from our institution to improve patient safety. We also aim to publish our results in peer-reviewed journals and will submit abstracts to international conferences to disseminate our findings. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7934732/ /pubmed/33664066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040360 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Truchot, Jennifer
Boucher, Valérie
Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane
Malo, Christian
Brassard, Éric
Marcotte, Jean
Martel, Guillaume
Côté, Geneviève
Garneau, Christian
Bouchard, Gino
Emond, Marcel
Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
title Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
title_full Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
title_fullStr Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
title_short Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
title_sort evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040360
work_keys_str_mv AT truchotjennifer evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT bouchervalerie evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT raymonddufresneeliane evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT malochristian evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT brassarderic evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT marcottejean evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT martelguillaume evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT cotegenevieve evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT garneauchristian evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT bouchardgino evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT emondmarcel evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol