Cargando…
Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol
INTRODUCTION: In situ simulation (ISS) consists of performing a simulation in the everyday working environment with the usual team members. The feasibility of ISS in emergency medicine is an important research question, because ISS offers the possibility for repetitive, regular simulation training c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040360 |
_version_ | 1783660873008545792 |
---|---|
author | Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Malo, Christian Brassard, Éric Marcotte, Jean Martel, Guillaume Côté, Geneviève Garneau, Christian Bouchard, Gino Emond, Marcel |
author_facet | Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Malo, Christian Brassard, Éric Marcotte, Jean Martel, Guillaume Côté, Geneviève Garneau, Christian Bouchard, Gino Emond, Marcel |
author_sort | Truchot, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In situ simulation (ISS) consists of performing a simulation in the everyday working environment with the usual team members. The feasibility of ISS in emergency medicine is an important research question, because ISS offers the possibility for repetitive, regular simulation training consistent with specific local needs. However, ISS also raises the issue of safety, since it might negatively impact the care of other patients in the emergency department (ED). Our hypothesis is that ISS in an academic high-volume ED is feasible, safe and associated with benefits for both staff and patients. METHODS: A mixed-method, including a qualitative method for the assessment of feasibility and acceptability and a quantitative method for the assessment of patients’ safety and participants’ psychosocial risks, will be used in this study. Two distinct phases are planned in the ED of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval (Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus) between March 2021 and October 2021. Phase 1: an ISS programme will be implemented with selected ED professionals to assess its acceptability and safety and prove the validity of our educational concept. The number of cancelled sessions and the reasons for cancellation will be collected to establish feasibility criteria. Semistructured interviews will evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. We will compare unannounced and announced ISS. Phase 2: the impact of the ISS programme will be measured with validated questionnaires for the assessment of psychosocial risks, self-confidence and perceived stress among nonselected ED professionals, with comparison between those exposed to ISS and those that were not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research ethics board has approved this protocol (#2020–5000). Results will be presented to key professionals from our institution to improve patient safety. We also aim to publish our results in peer-reviewed journals and will submit abstracts to international conferences to disseminate our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7934732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79347322021-03-19 Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Malo, Christian Brassard, Éric Marcotte, Jean Martel, Guillaume Côté, Geneviève Garneau, Christian Bouchard, Gino Emond, Marcel BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: In situ simulation (ISS) consists of performing a simulation in the everyday working environment with the usual team members. The feasibility of ISS in emergency medicine is an important research question, because ISS offers the possibility for repetitive, regular simulation training consistent with specific local needs. However, ISS also raises the issue of safety, since it might negatively impact the care of other patients in the emergency department (ED). Our hypothesis is that ISS in an academic high-volume ED is feasible, safe and associated with benefits for both staff and patients. METHODS: A mixed-method, including a qualitative method for the assessment of feasibility and acceptability and a quantitative method for the assessment of patients’ safety and participants’ psychosocial risks, will be used in this study. Two distinct phases are planned in the ED of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval (Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus) between March 2021 and October 2021. Phase 1: an ISS programme will be implemented with selected ED professionals to assess its acceptability and safety and prove the validity of our educational concept. The number of cancelled sessions and the reasons for cancellation will be collected to establish feasibility criteria. Semistructured interviews will evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. We will compare unannounced and announced ISS. Phase 2: the impact of the ISS programme will be measured with validated questionnaires for the assessment of psychosocial risks, self-confidence and perceived stress among nonselected ED professionals, with comparison between those exposed to ISS and those that were not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research ethics board has approved this protocol (#2020–5000). Results will be presented to key professionals from our institution to improve patient safety. We also aim to publish our results in peer-reviewed journals and will submit abstracts to international conferences to disseminate our findings. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7934732/ /pubmed/33664066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040360 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Malo, Christian Brassard, Éric Marcotte, Jean Martel, Guillaume Côté, Geneviève Garneau, Christian Bouchard, Gino Emond, Marcel Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol |
title | Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol |
title_full | Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol |
title_short | Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol |
title_sort | evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine—a mixed-method study protocol |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT truchotjennifer evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT bouchervalerie evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT raymonddufresneeliane evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT malochristian evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT brassarderic evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT marcottejean evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT martelguillaume evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT cotegenevieve evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT garneauchristian evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT bouchardgino evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol AT emondmarcel evaluationofthefeasibilityandimpactsofinsitusimulationinemergencymedicineamixedmethodstudyprotocol |