Cargando…

Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to review the literature to identify frailty instruments in use for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) recipients and synthesise prognostic data from these studies, in order to inform clinical management of frail patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: We syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhe, Dawson, Emily, Moodie, Jessica, Martin, Janet, Bagur, Rodrigo, Cheng, Davy, Kiaii, Bob, Hashi, Adam, Bi, Ran, Yeschin, Michelle, John-Baptiste, Ava
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040459
_version_ 1783660881179049984
author Li, Zhe
Dawson, Emily
Moodie, Jessica
Martin, Janet
Bagur, Rodrigo
Cheng, Davy
Kiaii, Bob
Hashi, Adam
Bi, Ran
Yeschin, Michelle
John-Baptiste, Ava
author_facet Li, Zhe
Dawson, Emily
Moodie, Jessica
Martin, Janet
Bagur, Rodrigo
Cheng, Davy
Kiaii, Bob
Hashi, Adam
Bi, Ran
Yeschin, Michelle
John-Baptiste, Ava
author_sort Li, Zhe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to review the literature to identify frailty instruments in use for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) recipients and synthesise prognostic data from these studies, in order to inform clinical management of frail patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature published in 2006 or later. We included studies of patients with aortic stenosis, diagnosed as frail, who underwent a TAVI procedure that reported mortality or clinical outcomes. We categorised the frailty instruments and reported on the prevalence of frailty in each study. We summarised the frequency of clinical outcomes and pooled outcomes from multiple studies. We explored heterogeneity and performed subgroup analysis, where possible. We also used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the overall certainty of the estimates. RESULTS: Of 49 included studies, 21 used single-dimension measures to assess frailty, 3 used administrative data-based measures, and 25 used multidimensional measures. Prevalence of frailty ranged from 5.67% to 90.07%. Albumin was the most commonly used single-dimension frailty measure and the Fried or modified Fried phenotype were the most commonly used multidimensional measures. Meta-analyses of studies that used either the Fried or modified Fried phenotype showed a 30-day mortality of 7.86% (95% CI 5.20% to 11.70%) and a 1-year mortality of 26.91% (95% CI 21.50% to 33.11%). The GRADE system suggests very low certainty of the respective estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty instruments varied across studies, leading to a wide range of frailty prevalence estimates for TAVI recipients and substantial heterogeneity. The results provide clinicians, patients and healthcare administrators, with potentially useful information on the prognosis of frail patients undergoing TAVI. This review highlights the need for standardisation of frailty measurement to promote consistency. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018090597.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79347842021-03-19 Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Zhe Dawson, Emily Moodie, Jessica Martin, Janet Bagur, Rodrigo Cheng, Davy Kiaii, Bob Hashi, Adam Bi, Ran Yeschin, Michelle John-Baptiste, Ava BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to review the literature to identify frailty instruments in use for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) recipients and synthesise prognostic data from these studies, in order to inform clinical management of frail patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature published in 2006 or later. We included studies of patients with aortic stenosis, diagnosed as frail, who underwent a TAVI procedure that reported mortality or clinical outcomes. We categorised the frailty instruments and reported on the prevalence of frailty in each study. We summarised the frequency of clinical outcomes and pooled outcomes from multiple studies. We explored heterogeneity and performed subgroup analysis, where possible. We also used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the overall certainty of the estimates. RESULTS: Of 49 included studies, 21 used single-dimension measures to assess frailty, 3 used administrative data-based measures, and 25 used multidimensional measures. Prevalence of frailty ranged from 5.67% to 90.07%. Albumin was the most commonly used single-dimension frailty measure and the Fried or modified Fried phenotype were the most commonly used multidimensional measures. Meta-analyses of studies that used either the Fried or modified Fried phenotype showed a 30-day mortality of 7.86% (95% CI 5.20% to 11.70%) and a 1-year mortality of 26.91% (95% CI 21.50% to 33.11%). The GRADE system suggests very low certainty of the respective estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty instruments varied across studies, leading to a wide range of frailty prevalence estimates for TAVI recipients and substantial heterogeneity. The results provide clinicians, patients and healthcare administrators, with potentially useful information on the prognosis of frail patients undergoing TAVI. This review highlights the need for standardisation of frailty measurement to promote consistency. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018090597. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7934784/ /pubmed/33664067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040459 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Li, Zhe
Dawson, Emily
Moodie, Jessica
Martin, Janet
Bagur, Rodrigo
Cheng, Davy
Kiaii, Bob
Hashi, Adam
Bi, Ran
Yeschin, Michelle
John-Baptiste, Ava
Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort measurement and prognosis of frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040459
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhe measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dawsonemily measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moodiejessica measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinjanet measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bagurrodrigo measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengdavy measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kiaiibob measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hashiadam measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT biran measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yeschinmichelle measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnbaptisteava measurementandprognosisoffrailpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis