Cargando…

Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on the adherence of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 in an in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had an in vitro, longitudinal, and comparative exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabanillas, Betty, Mallma-Medina, Adrián, Petkova-Gueorguieva, Marieta, Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel, Mendoza, Román, Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688467
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_291_20
_version_ 1783660889026592768
author Cabanillas, Betty
Mallma-Medina, Adrián
Petkova-Gueorguieva, Marieta
Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
Mendoza, Román
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
author_facet Cabanillas, Betty
Mallma-Medina, Adrián
Petkova-Gueorguieva, Marieta
Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
Mendoza, Román
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
author_sort Cabanillas, Betty
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on the adherence of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 in an in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had an in vitro, longitudinal, and comparative experimental design. The following groups were made: (1) Vitacryl versus controls (water, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerol, diethylene glycol, and formamide); (2) Triplex versus the same controls; (3) Vitacryl versus Triplex (surface energy); and (4) Vitacryl versus Triplex (adhesion per cell/field). Adhesion was measured in the area of each field magnified 10 × 10, and with an increase in magnification to 40 × 10, very dense colonies of 0.152 mm(2) were observed. RESULTS: The surface energy of Vitacryl and Triplex was 40.3 ± 0.3 and 39.5 ± 0.3N/m, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). On the contrary, in relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, Vitacryl presented 15.7 ± 1.1, whereas Triplex had 16.7 ± 2.3, with no significant differences (P = 0.058). CONCLUSION: In relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, there was no evidence of significant differences between Vitacryl and Triplex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79348182021-03-08 Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study Cabanillas, Betty Mallma-Medina, Adrián Petkova-Gueorguieva, Marieta Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel Mendoza, Román Mayta-Tovalino, Frank J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on the adherence of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 in an in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had an in vitro, longitudinal, and comparative experimental design. The following groups were made: (1) Vitacryl versus controls (water, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerol, diethylene glycol, and formamide); (2) Triplex versus the same controls; (3) Vitacryl versus Triplex (surface energy); and (4) Vitacryl versus Triplex (adhesion per cell/field). Adhesion was measured in the area of each field magnified 10 × 10, and with an increase in magnification to 40 × 10, very dense colonies of 0.152 mm(2) were observed. RESULTS: The surface energy of Vitacryl and Triplex was 40.3 ± 0.3 and 39.5 ± 0.3N/m, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). On the contrary, in relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, Vitacryl presented 15.7 ± 1.1, whereas Triplex had 16.7 ± 2.3, with no significant differences (P = 0.058). CONCLUSION: In relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, there was no evidence of significant differences between Vitacryl and Triplex. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7934818/ /pubmed/33688467 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_291_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cabanillas, Betty
Mallma-Medina, Adrián
Petkova-Gueorguieva, Marieta
Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
Mendoza, Román
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study
title Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study
title_full Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study
title_short Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study
title_sort influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate on the adherence of candida albicans: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688467
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_291_20
work_keys_str_mv AT cabanillasbetty influenceofthesurfaceenergyofdifferentbrandsofpolymethylmethacrylateontheadherenceofcandidaalbicansaninvitrostudy
AT mallmamedinaadrian influenceofthesurfaceenergyofdifferentbrandsofpolymethylmethacrylateontheadherenceofcandidaalbicansaninvitrostudy
AT petkovagueorguievamarieta influenceofthesurfaceenergyofdifferentbrandsofpolymethylmethacrylateontheadherenceofcandidaalbicansaninvitrostudy
AT alviteztemochedaniel influenceofthesurfaceenergyofdifferentbrandsofpolymethylmethacrylateontheadherenceofcandidaalbicansaninvitrostudy
AT mendozaroman influenceofthesurfaceenergyofdifferentbrandsofpolymethylmethacrylateontheadherenceofcandidaalbicansaninvitrostudy
AT maytatovalinofrank influenceofthesurfaceenergyofdifferentbrandsofpolymethylmethacrylateontheadherenceofcandidaalbicansaninvitrostudy