Cargando…

Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina

Testudines are susceptible to inversion and self-righting using their necks, limbs or both, to generate enough mechanical force to flip over. We investigated how shell morphology, neck length and self-righting biomechanics scale with body mass during ontogeny in Chelydra serpentina, which uses neck-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruhr, Ilan M., Rose, Kayleigh A. R., Sellers, William I., Crossley, Dane A., Codd, Jonathan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33653130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0213
_version_ 1783660907127111680
author Ruhr, Ilan M.
Rose, Kayleigh A. R.
Sellers, William I.
Crossley, Dane A.
Codd, Jonathan R.
author_facet Ruhr, Ilan M.
Rose, Kayleigh A. R.
Sellers, William I.
Crossley, Dane A.
Codd, Jonathan R.
author_sort Ruhr, Ilan M.
collection PubMed
description Testudines are susceptible to inversion and self-righting using their necks, limbs or both, to generate enough mechanical force to flip over. We investigated how shell morphology, neck length and self-righting biomechanics scale with body mass during ontogeny in Chelydra serpentina, which uses neck-powered self-righting. We found that younger turtles flipped over twice as fast as older individuals. A simple geometric model predicted the relationships of shell shape and self-righting time with body mass. Conversely, neck force, power output and kinetic energy increase with body mass at rates greater than predicted. These findings were correlated with relatively longer necks in younger turtles than would be predicted by geometric similarity. Therefore, younger turtles self-right with lower biomechanical costs than predicted by simple scaling theory. Considering younger turtles are more prone to inverting and their shells offer less protection, faster and less costly self-righting would be advantageous in overcoming the detriments of inversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79348992021-07-15 Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina Ruhr, Ilan M. Rose, Kayleigh A. R. Sellers, William I. Crossley, Dane A. Codd, Jonathan R. Proc Biol Sci Morphology and Biomechanics Testudines are susceptible to inversion and self-righting using their necks, limbs or both, to generate enough mechanical force to flip over. We investigated how shell morphology, neck length and self-righting biomechanics scale with body mass during ontogeny in Chelydra serpentina, which uses neck-powered self-righting. We found that younger turtles flipped over twice as fast as older individuals. A simple geometric model predicted the relationships of shell shape and self-righting time with body mass. Conversely, neck force, power output and kinetic energy increase with body mass at rates greater than predicted. These findings were correlated with relatively longer necks in younger turtles than would be predicted by geometric similarity. Therefore, younger turtles self-right with lower biomechanical costs than predicted by simple scaling theory. Considering younger turtles are more prone to inverting and their shells offer less protection, faster and less costly self-righting would be advantageous in overcoming the detriments of inversion. The Royal Society 2021-03-10 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7934899/ /pubmed/33653130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0213 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Morphology and Biomechanics
Ruhr, Ilan M.
Rose, Kayleigh A. R.
Sellers, William I.
Crossley, Dane A.
Codd, Jonathan R.
Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina
title Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina
title_full Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina
title_fullStr Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina
title_full_unstemmed Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina
title_short Turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in Chelydra serpentina
title_sort turning turtle: scaling relationships and self-righting ability in chelydra serpentina
topic Morphology and Biomechanics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33653130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0213
work_keys_str_mv AT ruhrilanm turningturtlescalingrelationshipsandselfrightingabilityinchelydraserpentina
AT rosekayleighar turningturtlescalingrelationshipsandselfrightingabilityinchelydraserpentina
AT sellerswilliami turningturtlescalingrelationshipsandselfrightingabilityinchelydraserpentina
AT crossleydanea turningturtlescalingrelationshipsandselfrightingabilityinchelydraserpentina
AT coddjonathanr turningturtlescalingrelationshipsandselfrightingabilityinchelydraserpentina