Cargando…
Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry
Most patients with glioblastoma (GBM) die within 2 years. A major therapeutic goal is to target GBM stem cells (GSCs), a subpopulation of cells that contribute to treatment resistance and recurrence. Since their discovery in 2003, GSCs have been isolated using single-surface markers, such as CD15, C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Clinical Investigation
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.128456 |
_version_ | 1783660915406667776 |
---|---|
author | Galdieri, Luciano Jash, Arijita Malkova, Olga Mao, Diane D. DeSouza, Patrick Chu, Yunli E. Salter, Amber Campian, Jian L. Naegle, Kristen M. Brennan, Cameron W. Wakimoto, Hiroaki Oh, Stephen T. Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. |
author_facet | Galdieri, Luciano Jash, Arijita Malkova, Olga Mao, Diane D. DeSouza, Patrick Chu, Yunli E. Salter, Amber Campian, Jian L. Naegle, Kristen M. Brennan, Cameron W. Wakimoto, Hiroaki Oh, Stephen T. Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. |
author_sort | Galdieri, Luciano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most patients with glioblastoma (GBM) die within 2 years. A major therapeutic goal is to target GBM stem cells (GSCs), a subpopulation of cells that contribute to treatment resistance and recurrence. Since their discovery in 2003, GSCs have been isolated using single-surface markers, such as CD15, CD44, CD133, and α(6) integrin. It remains unknown how these single-surface marker–defined GSC populations compare with each other in terms of signaling and function and whether expression of different combinations of these markers is associated with different functional capacity. Using mass cytometry and fresh operating room specimens, we found 15 distinct GSC subpopulations in patients, and they differed in their MEK/ERK, WNT, and AKT pathway activation status. Once in culture, some subpopulations were lost and previously undetectable ones materialized. GSCs that highly expressed all 4 surface markers had the greatest self-renewal capacity, WNT inhibitor sensitivity, and in vivo tumorigenicity. This work highlights the potential signaling and phenotypic diversity of GSCs. Larger patient sample sizes and antibody panels are required to confirm these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7934942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Clinical Investigation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79349422021-03-09 Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry Galdieri, Luciano Jash, Arijita Malkova, Olga Mao, Diane D. DeSouza, Patrick Chu, Yunli E. Salter, Amber Campian, Jian L. Naegle, Kristen M. Brennan, Cameron W. Wakimoto, Hiroaki Oh, Stephen T. Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. JCI Insight Research Article Most patients with glioblastoma (GBM) die within 2 years. A major therapeutic goal is to target GBM stem cells (GSCs), a subpopulation of cells that contribute to treatment resistance and recurrence. Since their discovery in 2003, GSCs have been isolated using single-surface markers, such as CD15, CD44, CD133, and α(6) integrin. It remains unknown how these single-surface marker–defined GSC populations compare with each other in terms of signaling and function and whether expression of different combinations of these markers is associated with different functional capacity. Using mass cytometry and fresh operating room specimens, we found 15 distinct GSC subpopulations in patients, and they differed in their MEK/ERK, WNT, and AKT pathway activation status. Once in culture, some subpopulations were lost and previously undetectable ones materialized. GSCs that highly expressed all 4 surface markers had the greatest self-renewal capacity, WNT inhibitor sensitivity, and in vivo tumorigenicity. This work highlights the potential signaling and phenotypic diversity of GSCs. Larger patient sample sizes and antibody panels are required to confirm these findings. American Society for Clinical Investigation 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7934942/ /pubmed/33400685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.128456 Text en © 2021 Galdieri et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Galdieri, Luciano Jash, Arijita Malkova, Olga Mao, Diane D. DeSouza, Patrick Chu, Yunli E. Salter, Amber Campian, Jian L. Naegle, Kristen M. Brennan, Cameron W. Wakimoto, Hiroaki Oh, Stephen T. Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry |
title | Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry |
title_full | Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry |
title_fullStr | Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry |
title_short | Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry |
title_sort | defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.128456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galdieriluciano definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT jasharijita definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT malkovaolga definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT maodianed definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT desouzapatrick definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT chuyunlie definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT salteramber definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT campianjianl definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT naeglekristenm definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT brennancameronw definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT wakimotohiroaki definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT ohstephent definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT kimalberth definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry AT chhedamilang definingphenotypicandfunctionalheterogeneityofglioblastomastemcellsbymasscytometry |