Cargando…
The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is caused by many sociodemographic and economic risk factors other than H. pylori infection. However, no studies reported an association between PUD and the number of household members. We showed the number of family members affected by PUD based on sex in a Korean populat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7935938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84892-5 |
_version_ | 1783661101618036736 |
---|---|
author | Yim, Mi Hong Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Bum Ju |
author_facet | Yim, Mi Hong Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Bum Ju |
author_sort | Yim, Mi Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is caused by many sociodemographic and economic risk factors other than H. pylori infection. However, no studies reported an association between PUD and the number of household members. We showed the number of family members affected by PUD based on sex in a Korean population. This cross-sectional study used 1998–2009 data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multiple binary logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were constructed to analyze the association of PUD with the number of household members. The number of household members was associated with PUD, age, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, glucose, location (urban/rural), income, education level, stress, current drinking, and smoking in both sexes. Men with other household members had a higher PUD risk compared to men or women living alone (reference), and the opposite was observed for women. Men with 4 household members had a higher PUD risk than men living alone in the model adjusted for age, BMI, income, location, education, and stress (OR = 2.04 [95% CI 1.28–3.27], p value = .003). Women with more than 6 household members had a lower PUD risk than women living alone in the adjusted model (OR = 0.50 [0.33–0.75], p value = .001). Women with more household members had a lower PUD risk. However, more men had PUD than women regardless of the number of household members. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7935938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79359382021-03-08 The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease Yim, Mi Hong Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Bum Ju Sci Rep Article Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is caused by many sociodemographic and economic risk factors other than H. pylori infection. However, no studies reported an association between PUD and the number of household members. We showed the number of family members affected by PUD based on sex in a Korean population. This cross-sectional study used 1998–2009 data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multiple binary logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were constructed to analyze the association of PUD with the number of household members. The number of household members was associated with PUD, age, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, glucose, location (urban/rural), income, education level, stress, current drinking, and smoking in both sexes. Men with other household members had a higher PUD risk compared to men or women living alone (reference), and the opposite was observed for women. Men with 4 household members had a higher PUD risk than men living alone in the model adjusted for age, BMI, income, location, education, and stress (OR = 2.04 [95% CI 1.28–3.27], p value = .003). Women with more than 6 household members had a lower PUD risk than women living alone in the adjusted model (OR = 0.50 [0.33–0.75], p value = .001). Women with more household members had a lower PUD risk. However, more men had PUD than women regardless of the number of household members. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7935938/ /pubmed/33674696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84892-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Yim, Mi Hong Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Bum Ju The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease |
title | The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease |
title_full | The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease |
title_fullStr | The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease |
title_short | The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease |
title_sort | number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7935938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84892-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yimmihong thenumberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT kimkeunho thenumberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT leebumju thenumberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT yimmihong numberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT kimkeunho numberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT leebumju numberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease |