Cargando…

Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds

To have a better understanding of how the “gut–liver axis” mediates the lipid deposition in the liver, a comparison of overfeeding influence on intestine physiology and microbiota between Gang Goose and Tianfu Meat Goose was performed in this study. After force-feeding, compared with Gang Goose, Tia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, R.X., Ye, F.J., He, F., Song, Q., Xiong, X.P., Yang, W.L., Gang, X., Hu, J.W., Hu, B., Xu, H.Y., Li, L., Liu, H.H., Zeng, X.Y., Chen, L., Kang, B., Han, C.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.057
_version_ 1783661155049275392
author Wei, R.X.
Ye, F.J.
He, F.
Song, Q.
Xiong, X.P.
Yang, W.L.
Gang, X.
Hu, J.W.
Hu, B.
Xu, H.Y.
Li, L.
Liu, H.H.
Zeng, X.Y.
Chen, L.
Kang, B.
Han, C.C.
author_facet Wei, R.X.
Ye, F.J.
He, F.
Song, Q.
Xiong, X.P.
Yang, W.L.
Gang, X.
Hu, J.W.
Hu, B.
Xu, H.Y.
Li, L.
Liu, H.H.
Zeng, X.Y.
Chen, L.
Kang, B.
Han, C.C.
author_sort Wei, R.X.
collection PubMed
description To have a better understanding of how the “gut–liver axis” mediates the lipid deposition in the liver, a comparison of overfeeding influence on intestine physiology and microbiota between Gang Goose and Tianfu Meat Goose was performed in this study. After force-feeding, compared with Gang Goose, Tianfu Meat Goose had better fat storage capacity in liver (397.94 vs. 166.54 for foie gras weight (g), P < 0.05; 6.37 vs. 2.92% for the ratio of liver to body, P < 0.05; 60.01 vs. 46.64% for fat content, P < 0.05) and the less subcutaneous adipose tissue weight (1240.96 g vs. 1440.46 g, P < 0.05). After force-feeding, the digestion–absorption capacity of Tianfu Meat Goose was higher than that of Gang Goose (5.56 vs. 3.64 and 4.63 vs. 3.68 for the ratio of villus height to crypt depth in duodenum and ileum, respectively, P < 0.05; 1394.96 vs. 782.59 and 1314.76 vs. 766.17 for the invertase activity (U/mg-prot), in duodenum and ileum, respectively, P < 0.05; 6038.36 vs. 3088.29 and 4645.29 vs. 3927.61 for the activity of maltase (U/mg-prot), in duodenum and ileum, respectively, P < 0.05). Force-feeding decreased the gene expression of Escherichia coli in the ileum of Tianfu Meat Goose; force-feeding increased the number of gut microbiota Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus-Polymerase Chain Reaction band in Tianfu Meat Goose and decreased the number in Gang Goose. In conclusion, compared with Gang Goose, the lipid deposition in the liver and the intestine digestion–absorption capacity and stability were higher in Tianfu Meat Goose. Thereby, Tianfu Meat Goose is the better breed for foie gras production for prolonged force-feeding; Gang Goose possesses better fat storage capacity in subcutaneous adipose tissue. However, Gang Goose has lower gut stability responding to force-feeding, so Gang Goose is suited to force-feeding in a short time to gain the body weight and subcutaneous fat as an overfed duck for roast duck.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7936201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79362012021-03-15 Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds Wei, R.X. Ye, F.J. He, F. Song, Q. Xiong, X.P. Yang, W.L. Gang, X. Hu, J.W. Hu, B. Xu, H.Y. Li, L. Liu, H.H. Zeng, X.Y. Chen, L. Kang, B. Han, C.C. Poult Sci Physiology and Reproduction To have a better understanding of how the “gut–liver axis” mediates the lipid deposition in the liver, a comparison of overfeeding influence on intestine physiology and microbiota between Gang Goose and Tianfu Meat Goose was performed in this study. After force-feeding, compared with Gang Goose, Tianfu Meat Goose had better fat storage capacity in liver (397.94 vs. 166.54 for foie gras weight (g), P < 0.05; 6.37 vs. 2.92% for the ratio of liver to body, P < 0.05; 60.01 vs. 46.64% for fat content, P < 0.05) and the less subcutaneous adipose tissue weight (1240.96 g vs. 1440.46 g, P < 0.05). After force-feeding, the digestion–absorption capacity of Tianfu Meat Goose was higher than that of Gang Goose (5.56 vs. 3.64 and 4.63 vs. 3.68 for the ratio of villus height to crypt depth in duodenum and ileum, respectively, P < 0.05; 1394.96 vs. 782.59 and 1314.76 vs. 766.17 for the invertase activity (U/mg-prot), in duodenum and ileum, respectively, P < 0.05; 6038.36 vs. 3088.29 and 4645.29 vs. 3927.61 for the activity of maltase (U/mg-prot), in duodenum and ileum, respectively, P < 0.05). Force-feeding decreased the gene expression of Escherichia coli in the ileum of Tianfu Meat Goose; force-feeding increased the number of gut microbiota Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus-Polymerase Chain Reaction band in Tianfu Meat Goose and decreased the number in Gang Goose. In conclusion, compared with Gang Goose, the lipid deposition in the liver and the intestine digestion–absorption capacity and stability were higher in Tianfu Meat Goose. Thereby, Tianfu Meat Goose is the better breed for foie gras production for prolonged force-feeding; Gang Goose possesses better fat storage capacity in subcutaneous adipose tissue. However, Gang Goose has lower gut stability responding to force-feeding, so Gang Goose is suited to force-feeding in a short time to gain the body weight and subcutaneous fat as an overfed duck for roast duck. Elsevier 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7936201/ /pubmed/33652539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.057 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Physiology and Reproduction
Wei, R.X.
Ye, F.J.
He, F.
Song, Q.
Xiong, X.P.
Yang, W.L.
Gang, X.
Hu, J.W.
Hu, B.
Xu, H.Y.
Li, L.
Liu, H.H.
Zeng, X.Y.
Chen, L.
Kang, B.
Han, C.C.
Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds
title Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds
title_full Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds
title_fullStr Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds
title_short Comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds
title_sort comparison of overfeeding effects on gut physiology and microbiota in two goose breeds
topic Physiology and Reproduction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.057
work_keys_str_mv AT weirx comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT yefj comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT hef comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT songq comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT xiongxp comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT yangwl comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT gangx comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT hujw comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT hub comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT xuhy comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT lil comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT liuhh comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT zengxy comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT chenl comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT kangb comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds
AT hancc comparisonofoverfeedingeffectsongutphysiologyandmicrobiotaintwogoosebreeds