Cargando…

A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions

BACKGROUND: The 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR (2005)) require States Parties to establish National Focal Points (NFPs) responsible for notifying the World Health Organization (WHO) of potential events that might constitute public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs), suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Packer, Corinne, Halabi, Sam F., Hollmeyer, Helge, Mithani, Salima S., Wilson, Lindsay, Ruckert, Arne, Labonté, Ronald, Fidler, David P., Gostin, Lawrence O., Wilson, Kumanan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33676512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00675-7
_version_ 1783661218697838592
author Packer, Corinne
Halabi, Sam F.
Hollmeyer, Helge
Mithani, Salima S.
Wilson, Lindsay
Ruckert, Arne
Labonté, Ronald
Fidler, David P.
Gostin, Lawrence O.
Wilson, Kumanan
author_facet Packer, Corinne
Halabi, Sam F.
Hollmeyer, Helge
Mithani, Salima S.
Wilson, Lindsay
Ruckert, Arne
Labonté, Ronald
Fidler, David P.
Gostin, Lawrence O.
Wilson, Kumanan
author_sort Packer, Corinne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR (2005)) require States Parties to establish National Focal Points (NFPs) responsible for notifying the World Health Organization (WHO) of potential events that might constitute public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs), such as outbreaks of novel infectious diseases. Given the critical role of NFPs in the global surveillance and response system supported by the IHR, we sought to assess their experiences in carrying out their functions. METHODS: In collaboration with WHO officials, we administered a voluntary online survey to all 196 States Parties to the IHR (2005) in Africa, Asia, Europe, and South and North America, from October to November 2019. The survey was available in six languages via a secure internet-based system. RESULTS: In total, 121 NFP representatives answered the 56-question survey; 105 in full, and an additional 16 in part, resulting in a response rate of 62% (121 responses to 196 invitations to participate). The majority of NFPs knew how to notify the WHO of a potential PHEIC, and believed they have the content expertise to carry out their functions. Respondents found training workshops organized by WHO Regional Offices helpful on how to report PHEICs. NFPs experienced challenges in four critical areas: 1) insufficient intersectoral collaboration within their countries, including limited access to, or a lack of cooperation from, key relevant ministries; 2) inadequate communications, such as deficient information technology systems in place to carry out their functions in a timely fashion; 3) lack of authority to report potential PHEICs; and 4) inadequacies in some resources made available by the WHO, including a key tool – the NFP Guide. Finally, many NFP representatives expressed concern about how WHO uses the information they receive from NFPs. CONCLUSION: Our study, conducted just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, illustrates key challenges experienced by NFPs that can affect States Parties and WHO performance when outbreaks occur. In order for NFPs to be able to rapidly and successfully communicate potential PHEICs such as COVID-19 in the future, continued measures need to be taken by both WHO and States Parties to ensure NFPs have the necessary authority, capacity, training, and resources to effectively carry out their functions as described in the IHR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-021-00675-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7936598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79365982021-03-08 A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions Packer, Corinne Halabi, Sam F. Hollmeyer, Helge Mithani, Salima S. Wilson, Lindsay Ruckert, Arne Labonté, Ronald Fidler, David P. Gostin, Lawrence O. Wilson, Kumanan Global Health Research BACKGROUND: The 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR (2005)) require States Parties to establish National Focal Points (NFPs) responsible for notifying the World Health Organization (WHO) of potential events that might constitute public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs), such as outbreaks of novel infectious diseases. Given the critical role of NFPs in the global surveillance and response system supported by the IHR, we sought to assess their experiences in carrying out their functions. METHODS: In collaboration with WHO officials, we administered a voluntary online survey to all 196 States Parties to the IHR (2005) in Africa, Asia, Europe, and South and North America, from October to November 2019. The survey was available in six languages via a secure internet-based system. RESULTS: In total, 121 NFP representatives answered the 56-question survey; 105 in full, and an additional 16 in part, resulting in a response rate of 62% (121 responses to 196 invitations to participate). The majority of NFPs knew how to notify the WHO of a potential PHEIC, and believed they have the content expertise to carry out their functions. Respondents found training workshops organized by WHO Regional Offices helpful on how to report PHEICs. NFPs experienced challenges in four critical areas: 1) insufficient intersectoral collaboration within their countries, including limited access to, or a lack of cooperation from, key relevant ministries; 2) inadequate communications, such as deficient information technology systems in place to carry out their functions in a timely fashion; 3) lack of authority to report potential PHEICs; and 4) inadequacies in some resources made available by the WHO, including a key tool – the NFP Guide. Finally, many NFP representatives expressed concern about how WHO uses the information they receive from NFPs. CONCLUSION: Our study, conducted just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, illustrates key challenges experienced by NFPs that can affect States Parties and WHO performance when outbreaks occur. In order for NFPs to be able to rapidly and successfully communicate potential PHEICs such as COVID-19 in the future, continued measures need to be taken by both WHO and States Parties to ensure NFPs have the necessary authority, capacity, training, and resources to effectively carry out their functions as described in the IHR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-021-00675-7. BioMed Central 2021-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7936598/ /pubmed/33676512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00675-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Packer, Corinne
Halabi, Sam F.
Hollmeyer, Helge
Mithani, Salima S.
Wilson, Lindsay
Ruckert, Arne
Labonté, Ronald
Fidler, David P.
Gostin, Lawrence O.
Wilson, Kumanan
A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions
title A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions
title_full A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions
title_fullStr A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions
title_full_unstemmed A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions
title_short A survey of International Health Regulations National Focal Points experiences in carrying out their functions
title_sort survey of international health regulations national focal points experiences in carrying out their functions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33676512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00675-7
work_keys_str_mv AT packercorinne asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT halabisamf asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT hollmeyerhelge asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT mithanisalimas asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT wilsonlindsay asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT ruckertarne asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT labonteronald asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT fidlerdavidp asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT gostinlawrenceo asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT wilsonkumanan asurveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT packercorinne surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT halabisamf surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT hollmeyerhelge surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT mithanisalimas surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT wilsonlindsay surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT ruckertarne surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT labonteronald surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT fidlerdavidp surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT gostinlawrenceo surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions
AT wilsonkumanan surveyofinternationalhealthregulationsnationalfocalpointsexperiencesincarryingouttheirfunctions