Cargando…

Mycophenolate mofetil for methotrexate-resistant juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVES: To investigate safety and efficacy of MMF in patients with severe or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma. METHODS: Consecutive juvenile localized scleroderma patients undergoing systemic treatment were included in a retrospective longitudinal study. Patients treated with MMF be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martini, Giorgia, Saggioro, Laura, Culpo, Roberta, Vittadello, Fabio, Meneghel, Alessandra, Zulian, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa392
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To investigate safety and efficacy of MMF in patients with severe or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma. METHODS: Consecutive juvenile localized scleroderma patients undergoing systemic treatment were included in a retrospective longitudinal study. Patients treated with MMF because they were refractory or intolerant to MTX (MMF-group) were compared with responders to MTX (MTX-group). Disease activity was assessed by Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool and thermography. Disease course was established on the number of relapses and treatment changes. Relapse-free survival was examined by Kaplan–Meier analysis. RESULTS: MMF and MTX groups included 22 and 47 patients, respectively. No significant difference in demographics, follow-up duration and treatment before diagnosis was observed between groups. The most represented clinical subtypes in the MMF-group were pansclerotic morphea and mixed subtype (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029, respectively), and linear scleroderma of the face in the MTX-group (P = 0.048). MMF was started because of MTX resistance (18 patients), relapse during MTX tapering/withdrawal (3 patients) and anaphylaxis to MTX (1 patient). After mean 9.4 years of follow-up, 90.9% of patients on MMF and 100% of those on MTX had inactive disease. No significant difference in relapse-free survival between the groups was found (P = 0.066, log-rank test), although MMF likely induced more persistent remission. MMF was well tolerated and combination of MMF and MTX did not increase its efficacy. CONCLUSION: The present study adds strong evidence on the efficacy and tolerance of MMF in severe and/or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma. Further controlled studies are needed to prove its efficacy as first line treatment.