Cargando…
Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study
BACKGROUND: A novel implant for occipitocervical fusion consisting of a median plate with an additional hook inserting in the foramen magnum was tested. Aim of this study was to test the stability of a new implant for occipitocervical fusion against the already available and employed median plate im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33676483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04112-z |
_version_ | 1783661365010890752 |
---|---|
author | Migliorini, Filippo Baroncini, Alice El Mansy, Yasser Quack, Valentin Prescher, Andreas Mischer, Max Greven, Johannes Tingart, Markus Eschweiler, Jörg |
author_facet | Migliorini, Filippo Baroncini, Alice El Mansy, Yasser Quack, Valentin Prescher, Andreas Mischer, Max Greven, Johannes Tingart, Markus Eschweiler, Jörg |
author_sort | Migliorini, Filippo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A novel implant for occipitocervical fusion consisting of a median plate with an additional hook inserting in the foramen magnum was tested. Aim of this study was to test the stability of a new implant for occipitocervical fusion against the already available and employed median plate implant without hook. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 36 rigid polyurethane foams occipital artificial bones were used. The two occipital implants, namely the occipital plate with hook (Group 1) and the one without hook (Group 2), were applied to the artificial occiput trough three occipital screws and ensured into the experimental setup trough a crossbar. The test parameters were set using the testing machine software as follows: (1) test speed: 10 mm/ min, with 25 mm/ min maximum; (2) preload: 5 N; (3) force switch-off threshold: 90% force drop from F_max. Failure force and path were recorded. Failure force is defined as the maximum reaction force under which failure occurs (F_max), while failure path is the travel path during which failure occurs (dL). RESULTS: Group 1 (plate with hook) showed a mean failure force of 459.3 ± 35.9 N and a mean failure path of 5.8 ± 0.3 mm Group 2 (plate without hook) showed a mean failure force of 323.9 ± 20.2 N and a mean failure path of 7.2 ± 0.4 mm. The Shapiro-Wilk test score was not significant (P > 0.1), assuming that data were normally distributed. Group 1 had a statistically significant greater F_max (+ 135.37; P > 0.0001) and less dL (− 1.52; P > 0.0001) compared to group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Medial plates with foramen magnum hooks showed to be more stable that plates without a hook. These new implants may represent a new tool in OCJ fixation, but further studies are required to investigate their behavior in an anatomical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7937312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79373122021-03-09 Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study Migliorini, Filippo Baroncini, Alice El Mansy, Yasser Quack, Valentin Prescher, Andreas Mischer, Max Greven, Johannes Tingart, Markus Eschweiler, Jörg BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A novel implant for occipitocervical fusion consisting of a median plate with an additional hook inserting in the foramen magnum was tested. Aim of this study was to test the stability of a new implant for occipitocervical fusion against the already available and employed median plate implant without hook. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 36 rigid polyurethane foams occipital artificial bones were used. The two occipital implants, namely the occipital plate with hook (Group 1) and the one without hook (Group 2), were applied to the artificial occiput trough three occipital screws and ensured into the experimental setup trough a crossbar. The test parameters were set using the testing machine software as follows: (1) test speed: 10 mm/ min, with 25 mm/ min maximum; (2) preload: 5 N; (3) force switch-off threshold: 90% force drop from F_max. Failure force and path were recorded. Failure force is defined as the maximum reaction force under which failure occurs (F_max), while failure path is the travel path during which failure occurs (dL). RESULTS: Group 1 (plate with hook) showed a mean failure force of 459.3 ± 35.9 N and a mean failure path of 5.8 ± 0.3 mm Group 2 (plate without hook) showed a mean failure force of 323.9 ± 20.2 N and a mean failure path of 7.2 ± 0.4 mm. The Shapiro-Wilk test score was not significant (P > 0.1), assuming that data were normally distributed. Group 1 had a statistically significant greater F_max (+ 135.37; P > 0.0001) and less dL (− 1.52; P > 0.0001) compared to group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Medial plates with foramen magnum hooks showed to be more stable that plates without a hook. These new implants may represent a new tool in OCJ fixation, but further studies are required to investigate their behavior in an anatomical setting. BioMed Central 2021-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7937312/ /pubmed/33676483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04112-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Migliorini, Filippo Baroncini, Alice El Mansy, Yasser Quack, Valentin Prescher, Andreas Mischer, Max Greven, Johannes Tingart, Markus Eschweiler, Jörg Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study |
title | Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study |
title_full | Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study |
title_short | Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study |
title_sort | evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33676483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04112-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT migliorinifilippo evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT baroncinialice evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT elmansyyasser evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT quackvalentin evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT prescherandreas evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT mischermax evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT grevenjohannes evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT tingartmarkus evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy AT eschweilerjorg evaluationofanoccipitocervicofusionwithanewimplantdesignabiomechanicalstudy |