Cargando…
Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom
BACKGROUND: In the UK, consultations for prescription medicines are available via private providers such as online pharmacies. However, these providers may have lower thresholds for prescribing certain drugs. This is a particular concern for antibiotics, given the increasing burden of antimicrobial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8 |
_version_ | 1783661392528670720 |
---|---|
author | Buchanan, James Roope, Laurence S. J. Morrell, Liz Pouwels, Koen B. Robotham, Julie V. Abel, Lucy Crook, Derrick W. Peto, Tim Butler, Christopher C. Walker, A. Sarah Wordsworth, Sarah |
author_facet | Buchanan, James Roope, Laurence S. J. Morrell, Liz Pouwels, Koen B. Robotham, Julie V. Abel, Lucy Crook, Derrick W. Peto, Tim Butler, Christopher C. Walker, A. Sarah Wordsworth, Sarah |
author_sort | Buchanan, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the UK, consultations for prescription medicines are available via private providers such as online pharmacies. However, these providers may have lower thresholds for prescribing certain drugs. This is a particular concern for antibiotics, given the increasing burden of antimicrobial resistance. Public preferences for consultations with online providers are unknown, hence the impact of increased availability of online consultations on antibiotic use and population health is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a discrete choice experiment survey to understand UK public preferences for seeking online consultations, and the factors that influence these preferences, in the context of having symptoms for which antibiotics may be appropriate. METHODS: In a survey conducted between July and August 2018, general population respondents completed 16 questions in which they chose a primary care consultation via either their local medical centre or an online provider. Consultations were described in terms of five attributes, including cost and similarity to traditional ‘face-to-face’ appointments. Choices were modelled using regression analysis. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 734) placed a high value on having a consultation via their local medical centre rather than an online provider, and a low value on consultations by phone or video. However, respondents characterised as ‘busy young professionals’ showed a lower strength of preference for traditional consultations, with a higher concern for convenience. CONCLUSION: Before COVID-19, the UK public had limited appetite for consultations with online providers, or for consultations that were not face-to-face. Nevertheless, prescriptions from online providers should be monitored going forward, particularly for antibiotics, and in key patient groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7937442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79374422021-03-08 Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom Buchanan, James Roope, Laurence S. J. Morrell, Liz Pouwels, Koen B. Robotham, Julie V. Abel, Lucy Crook, Derrick W. Peto, Tim Butler, Christopher C. Walker, A. Sarah Wordsworth, Sarah Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In the UK, consultations for prescription medicines are available via private providers such as online pharmacies. However, these providers may have lower thresholds for prescribing certain drugs. This is a particular concern for antibiotics, given the increasing burden of antimicrobial resistance. Public preferences for consultations with online providers are unknown, hence the impact of increased availability of online consultations on antibiotic use and population health is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a discrete choice experiment survey to understand UK public preferences for seeking online consultations, and the factors that influence these preferences, in the context of having symptoms for which antibiotics may be appropriate. METHODS: In a survey conducted between July and August 2018, general population respondents completed 16 questions in which they chose a primary care consultation via either their local medical centre or an online provider. Consultations were described in terms of five attributes, including cost and similarity to traditional ‘face-to-face’ appointments. Choices were modelled using regression analysis. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 734) placed a high value on having a consultation via their local medical centre rather than an online provider, and a low value on consultations by phone or video. However, respondents characterised as ‘busy young professionals’ showed a lower strength of preference for traditional consultations, with a higher concern for convenience. CONCLUSION: Before COVID-19, the UK public had limited appetite for consultations with online providers, or for consultations that were not face-to-face. Nevertheless, prescriptions from online providers should be monitored going forward, particularly for antibiotics, and in key patient groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7937442/ /pubmed/33682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Buchanan, James Roope, Laurence S. J. Morrell, Liz Pouwels, Koen B. Robotham, Julie V. Abel, Lucy Crook, Derrick W. Peto, Tim Butler, Christopher C. Walker, A. Sarah Wordsworth, Sarah Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom |
title | Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom |
title_full | Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom |
title_short | Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | preferences for medical consultations from online providers: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in the united kingdom |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buchananjames preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT roopelaurencesj preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT morrellliz preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT pouwelskoenb preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT robothamjuliev preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT abellucy preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT crookderrickw preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT petotim preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT butlerchristopherc preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT walkerasarah preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom AT wordsworthsarah preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom |