Cargando…

Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: In the UK, consultations for prescription medicines are available via private providers such as online pharmacies. However, these providers may have lower thresholds for prescribing certain drugs. This is a particular concern for antibiotics, given the increasing burden of antimicrobial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchanan, James, Roope, Laurence S. J., Morrell, Liz, Pouwels, Koen B., Robotham, Julie V., Abel, Lucy, Crook, Derrick W., Peto, Tim, Butler, Christopher C., Walker, A. Sarah, Wordsworth, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8
_version_ 1783661392528670720
author Buchanan, James
Roope, Laurence S. J.
Morrell, Liz
Pouwels, Koen B.
Robotham, Julie V.
Abel, Lucy
Crook, Derrick W.
Peto, Tim
Butler, Christopher C.
Walker, A. Sarah
Wordsworth, Sarah
author_facet Buchanan, James
Roope, Laurence S. J.
Morrell, Liz
Pouwels, Koen B.
Robotham, Julie V.
Abel, Lucy
Crook, Derrick W.
Peto, Tim
Butler, Christopher C.
Walker, A. Sarah
Wordsworth, Sarah
author_sort Buchanan, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the UK, consultations for prescription medicines are available via private providers such as online pharmacies. However, these providers may have lower thresholds for prescribing certain drugs. This is a particular concern for antibiotics, given the increasing burden of antimicrobial resistance. Public preferences for consultations with online providers are unknown, hence the impact of increased availability of online consultations on antibiotic use and population health is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a discrete choice experiment survey to understand UK public preferences for seeking online consultations, and the factors that influence these preferences, in the context of having symptoms for which antibiotics may be appropriate. METHODS: In a survey conducted between July and August 2018, general population respondents completed 16 questions in which they chose a primary care consultation via either their local medical centre or an online provider. Consultations were described in terms of five attributes, including cost and similarity to traditional ‘face-to-face’ appointments. Choices were modelled using regression analysis. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 734) placed a high value on having a consultation via their local medical centre rather than an online provider, and a low value on consultations by phone or video. However, respondents characterised as ‘busy young professionals’ showed a lower strength of preference for traditional consultations, with a higher concern for convenience. CONCLUSION: Before COVID-19, the UK public had limited appetite for consultations with online providers, or for consultations that were not face-to-face. Nevertheless, prescriptions from online providers should be monitored going forward, particularly for antibiotics, and in key patient groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7937442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79374422021-03-08 Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom Buchanan, James Roope, Laurence S. J. Morrell, Liz Pouwels, Koen B. Robotham, Julie V. Abel, Lucy Crook, Derrick W. Peto, Tim Butler, Christopher C. Walker, A. Sarah Wordsworth, Sarah Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In the UK, consultations for prescription medicines are available via private providers such as online pharmacies. However, these providers may have lower thresholds for prescribing certain drugs. This is a particular concern for antibiotics, given the increasing burden of antimicrobial resistance. Public preferences for consultations with online providers are unknown, hence the impact of increased availability of online consultations on antibiotic use and population health is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a discrete choice experiment survey to understand UK public preferences for seeking online consultations, and the factors that influence these preferences, in the context of having symptoms for which antibiotics may be appropriate. METHODS: In a survey conducted between July and August 2018, general population respondents completed 16 questions in which they chose a primary care consultation via either their local medical centre or an online provider. Consultations were described in terms of five attributes, including cost and similarity to traditional ‘face-to-face’ appointments. Choices were modelled using regression analysis. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 734) placed a high value on having a consultation via their local medical centre rather than an online provider, and a low value on consultations by phone or video. However, respondents characterised as ‘busy young professionals’ showed a lower strength of preference for traditional consultations, with a higher concern for convenience. CONCLUSION: Before COVID-19, the UK public had limited appetite for consultations with online providers, or for consultations that were not face-to-face. Nevertheless, prescriptions from online providers should be monitored going forward, particularly for antibiotics, and in key patient groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7937442/ /pubmed/33682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Buchanan, James
Roope, Laurence S. J.
Morrell, Liz
Pouwels, Koen B.
Robotham, Julie V.
Abel, Lucy
Crook, Derrick W.
Peto, Tim
Butler, Christopher C.
Walker, A. Sarah
Wordsworth, Sarah
Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom
title Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom
title_full Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom
title_short Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom
title_sort preferences for medical consultations from online providers: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in the united kingdom
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8
work_keys_str_mv AT buchananjames preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT roopelaurencesj preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT morrellliz preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT pouwelskoenb preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT robothamjuliev preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT abellucy preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT crookderrickw preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT petotim preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT butlerchristopherc preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT walkerasarah preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom
AT wordsworthsarah preferencesformedicalconsultationsfromonlineprovidersevidencefromadiscretechoiceexperimentintheunitedkingdom