Cargando…

A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION: In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishiguro, Shigeo, Asanuma, Kunihiro, Tamaki, Tatsuya, Oinuma, Kazuhiro, Sudo, Akihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33728081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593
_version_ 1783661400074223616
author Ishiguro, Shigeo
Asanuma, Kunihiro
Tamaki, Tatsuya
Oinuma, Kazuhiro
Sudo, Akihiro
author_facet Ishiguro, Shigeo
Asanuma, Kunihiro
Tamaki, Tatsuya
Oinuma, Kazuhiro
Sudo, Akihiro
author_sort Ishiguro, Shigeo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with a cemented mantle had gained popularity and had proven to be clinically effective. In Germany, a cementless impaction bone graft procedure using Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stems was devised, and functional scores were similar to conventional cemented Impaction bone grafts. Case presentation. A 48-year-old man presented with femur loosening of a reamed bipolar arthroplasty performed in 1990. The patient was treated with a cementless impaction bone graft using a Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stem in the femur in revision THA surgery, and the calcar was reconstructed by allograft. RESULTS: At five years, the calcar allograft united with the host bone, and the femoral component showed no subsidence. CONCLUSION: Calcar reconstruction with a strut allograft, aimed at preventing sinking of the stem was key in this operation. Surgical indication for femoral cementless impaction bone graft should be for loosened femoral prosthesis in a type II Paprosky classification, where only the cortical bone of the isthmus is partially affected, cortical thinning does not exist, and it is mechanically strong enough for the allograft tip impaction. The procedure was safely feasible through the direct anterior approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7937483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79374832021-03-15 A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction Ishiguro, Shigeo Asanuma, Kunihiro Tamaki, Tatsuya Oinuma, Kazuhiro Sudo, Akihiro Case Rep Orthop Case Report INTRODUCTION: In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with a cemented mantle had gained popularity and had proven to be clinically effective. In Germany, a cementless impaction bone graft procedure using Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stems was devised, and functional scores were similar to conventional cemented Impaction bone grafts. Case presentation. A 48-year-old man presented with femur loosening of a reamed bipolar arthroplasty performed in 1990. The patient was treated with a cementless impaction bone graft using a Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stem in the femur in revision THA surgery, and the calcar was reconstructed by allograft. RESULTS: At five years, the calcar allograft united with the host bone, and the femoral component showed no subsidence. CONCLUSION: Calcar reconstruction with a strut allograft, aimed at preventing sinking of the stem was key in this operation. Surgical indication for femoral cementless impaction bone graft should be for loosened femoral prosthesis in a type II Paprosky classification, where only the cortical bone of the isthmus is partially affected, cortical thinning does not exist, and it is mechanically strong enough for the allograft tip impaction. The procedure was safely feasible through the direct anterior approach. Hindawi 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7937483/ /pubmed/33728081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shigeo Ishiguro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Ishiguro, Shigeo
Asanuma, Kunihiro
Tamaki, Tatsuya
Oinuma, Kazuhiro
Sudo, Akihiro
A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_full A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_fullStr A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_short A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
title_sort case of cementless impaction bone graft in a revision total hip arthroplasty requiring calcar reconstruction
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33728081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593
work_keys_str_mv AT ishiguroshigeo acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT asanumakunihiro acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT tamakitatsuya acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT oinumakazuhiro acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT sudoakihiro acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT ishiguroshigeo caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT asanumakunihiro caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT tamakitatsuya caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT oinumakazuhiro caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction
AT sudoakihiro caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction