Cargando…

Protocol and Rationale for the Russian-Japanese “Tackle Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Outcome by Diet, Activities and Checking Body Weight Intervention” (RJ-TOMODACHI) Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The prevalence of obesity in Russia has increased sharply since the mid-1990s. Interestingly, the prevalence of obesity in Japan is lower than in many Western countries. Japan has implemented different types of weight control programs using a smart device to monitor patients remotely. Ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontsevaya, Anna, Drapkina, Oxana, Gorniy, Boris, Kalinina, Anna, Komkov, Denis, Balanova, Yulia, Bunova, Anna, Kushunina, Daria, Antsiferova, Aleksandra, Myrzamatova, Azalia, Lavrenova, Evgenia, Nomura, Eri, Iwatake, Maki, Waki, Takashi, Tanaka-Mizuno, Sachiko, Miura, Katsuyuki, Miyamoto, Yoshihiro, Tsushita, Kazuyo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Circulation Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0042
Descripción
Sumario:Background: The prevalence of obesity in Russia has increased sharply since the mid-1990s. Interestingly, the prevalence of obesity in Japan is lower than in many Western countries. Japan has implemented different types of weight control programs using a smart device to monitor patients remotely. New health promotion methods from Japan are now being used in Russia. The Russian-Japanese “Tackle Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Outcome by Diet, Activities and Checking Body Weight Intervention” (RJ-TOMODACHI) study aims to evaluate a preventive intervention using Japanese health monitoring technology in reducing excess body weight, compared with standard care, in Russia. Methods and Results: The trial is a single-center, 3-armed, parallel group randomized controlled trial conducted among overweight/obese adults. It has been designed to compare the effectiveness of 2 newly developed interventions against standard care for 6 months. Participants in the low- and high-intensity intervention groups will have 3 and 6 consultations over the study period, respectively. In all, 260 adults were screened at baseline; 65 did not participate in the trial for various reasons. The remaining 195 people were randomized into 3 groups (high-intensity intervention, n=73, low-intensity, n=73; standard care group, n=49). Conclusions: The trial protocol has been designed so that the methodology can be adapted for use in Russia.