Cargando…

Investigating the Characteristics of Covert Unilateral Spatial Neglect Using the Modified Posner Task: A Single-subject Design Study

OBJECTIVES: Patients identified as asymptomatic for unilateral spatial neglect (USN) based on paper-and-pen tests nonetheless often collide with objects to their left while walking. This study aimed to investigate chronic USN in subjects who experienced collisions while walking. METHODS: Two patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osaki, Shinpei, Amimoto, Kazu, Miyazaki, Yasuhiro, Tanabe, Junpei, Yoshihiro, Nao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JARM 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709039
http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20210014
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Patients identified as asymptomatic for unilateral spatial neglect (USN) based on paper-and-pen tests nonetheless often collide with objects to their left while walking. This study aimed to investigate chronic USN in subjects who experienced collisions while walking. METHODS: Two patients with chronic USN who experienced collisions while walking were evaluated using the Behavioral Inattention Test-conventional (BIT-c). Additionally, the modified Posner task (MPT) was used to evaluate the left and right reaction times. MPT targets randomly appeared either on the side indicated by the cue (valid condition) or on the opposite side (invalid condition). This study used an alternating treatments single-case design. The valid and invalid conditions of the MPT alternated rapidly and randomly to determine differences in reaction time. Statistical analysis compared left and right reaction times using a one-tailed randomization test to study valid and invalid conditions. RESULTS: The total BIT-c score was in the normal range for both subjects, whereas MPT reaction times were higher on the left side than on the right side for the invalid condition. However, for the valid condition, only Case B had increased reaction times on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: The MPT valid condition evaluates voluntary attention, whereas the invalid condition evaluates the reorientation of attention. Consequently, for Case A, a left reorientation of attention deficit was observed, whereas, for Case B, left voluntary attention and left reorientation of attention deficits were observed. The MPT results revealed the characteristics of covert neglect signs. USN evaluation would benefit from additional research using MPT.