Cargando…

Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI

In general, only one diffusion model would be applied to whole field-of-view voxels in the intravoxel incoherent motion-magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-MRI) study. However, the choice of the applied diffusion model can significantly influence the estimated diffusion parameters. The quality of the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Yen-Peng, Urayama, Shin-ichi, Isa, Tadashi, Fukuyama, Hidenao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.617152
_version_ 1783661480354250752
author Liao, Yen-Peng
Urayama, Shin-ichi
Isa, Tadashi
Fukuyama, Hidenao
author_facet Liao, Yen-Peng
Urayama, Shin-ichi
Isa, Tadashi
Fukuyama, Hidenao
author_sort Liao, Yen-Peng
collection PubMed
description In general, only one diffusion model would be applied to whole field-of-view voxels in the intravoxel incoherent motion-magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-MRI) study. However, the choice of the applied diffusion model can significantly influence the estimated diffusion parameters. The quality of the diffusion analysis can influence the reliability of the perfusion analysis. This study proposed an optimal model mapping method to improve the reliability of the perfusion parameter estimation in the IVIM study. Six healthy volunteers (five males and one female; average age of 38.3 ± 7.5 years). Volunteers were examined using a 3.0 Tesla scanner. IVIM-MRI of the brain was applied at 17 b-values ranging from 0 to 2,500 s/mm(2). The Gaussian model, the Kurtosis model, and the Gamma model were found to be optimal for the CSF, white matter (WM), and gray matter (GM), respectively. In the mean perfusion fraction (f(p)) analysis, the GM/WM ratios were 1.16 (Gaussian model), 1.80 (Kurtosis model), 1.94 (Gamma model), and 1.54 (Optimal model mapping); in the mean pseudo diffusion coefficient (D(*)) analysis, the GM/WM ratios were 1.18 (Gaussian model), 1.19 (Kurtosis model), 1.56 (Gamma model), and 1.24 (Optimal model mapping). With the optimal model mapping method, the estimated f(p) and D(*) were reliable compared with the conventional methods. In addition, the optimal model maps, the associated products of this method, may provide additional information for clinical diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7937866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79378662021-03-09 Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Liao, Yen-Peng Urayama, Shin-ichi Isa, Tadashi Fukuyama, Hidenao Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience In general, only one diffusion model would be applied to whole field-of-view voxels in the intravoxel incoherent motion-magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-MRI) study. However, the choice of the applied diffusion model can significantly influence the estimated diffusion parameters. The quality of the diffusion analysis can influence the reliability of the perfusion analysis. This study proposed an optimal model mapping method to improve the reliability of the perfusion parameter estimation in the IVIM study. Six healthy volunteers (five males and one female; average age of 38.3 ± 7.5 years). Volunteers were examined using a 3.0 Tesla scanner. IVIM-MRI of the brain was applied at 17 b-values ranging from 0 to 2,500 s/mm(2). The Gaussian model, the Kurtosis model, and the Gamma model were found to be optimal for the CSF, white matter (WM), and gray matter (GM), respectively. In the mean perfusion fraction (f(p)) analysis, the GM/WM ratios were 1.16 (Gaussian model), 1.80 (Kurtosis model), 1.94 (Gamma model), and 1.54 (Optimal model mapping); in the mean pseudo diffusion coefficient (D(*)) analysis, the GM/WM ratios were 1.18 (Gaussian model), 1.19 (Kurtosis model), 1.56 (Gamma model), and 1.24 (Optimal model mapping). With the optimal model mapping method, the estimated f(p) and D(*) were reliable compared with the conventional methods. In addition, the optimal model maps, the associated products of this method, may provide additional information for clinical diagnosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7937866/ /pubmed/33692677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.617152 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liao, Urayama, Isa and Fukuyama. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Liao, Yen-Peng
Urayama, Shin-ichi
Isa, Tadashi
Fukuyama, Hidenao
Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI
title Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI
title_full Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI
title_fullStr Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI
title_short Optimal Model Mapping for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI
title_sort optimal model mapping for intravoxel incoherent motion mri
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.617152
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoyenpeng optimalmodelmappingforintravoxelincoherentmotionmri
AT urayamashinichi optimalmodelmappingforintravoxelincoherentmotionmri
AT isatadashi optimalmodelmappingforintravoxelincoherentmotionmri
AT fukuyamahidenao optimalmodelmappingforintravoxelincoherentmotionmri