Cargando…

Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of first trimester combined screening for the detection of rare chromosomal abnormalities, other than Trisomies 21, 18 or 13 or 45 × . STUDY DESIGN: A database containing 36,254 pregnancies was analyzed. These patients were recruited at 15 US centers and includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kane, Daniel, D’Alton, Mary E., Malone, Fergal D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100123
_version_ 1783661507153756160
author Kane, Daniel
D’Alton, Mary E.
Malone, Fergal D.
author_facet Kane, Daniel
D’Alton, Mary E.
Malone, Fergal D.
author_sort Kane, Daniel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of first trimester combined screening for the detection of rare chromosomal abnormalities, other than Trisomies 21, 18 or 13 or 45 × . STUDY DESIGN: A database containing 36,254 pregnancies was analyzed. These patients were recruited at 15 US centers and included singleton pregnancies from 10 3/7–13 6/7 weeks. All patients had a nuchal translucency (NT) scan and those without a cystic hygroma (N = 36,120) underwent a combined first trimester screening test ('FTS' - NT, PAPP-A and fbHCG). A risk cut-off of 1:300, which was used for defining high risk for Trisomy 21, was also used to evaluate the detection rate for rare chromosomal abnormalities using the combined FTS test. RESULTS: 36,120 patients underwent combined FTS. Of these, 123 were found to have one of the following chromosomal abnormalities: Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13 or Turner syndrome. This study focuses on 40 additional patients who were found to have ‘other’ rare chromosomal abnormalities such as triploidy, structural chromosomal abnormalities, sex chromosome abnormalities or unusual chromosomal abnormalities (e.g. 47XX + 16), giving an incidence of 1.1 in 1000 for these rare chromosomal abnormalities. Of these 40 pregnancies, only 2 (5%) had an NT measurement of ≥3 mm. The detection rate for combined FTS, using a risk cut-off of ≥1:300, was 35 % (14 of 40 cases). Therefore, 65 % of cases of rarer fetal chromosomal abnormalities had a ‘normal’ combined FTS risk (<1:300) and 95 % had a ‘normal’ NT (<3 mm). CONCLUSION: Traditional FTS methods are unable to identify the vast majority of rare chromosomal abnormalities. Our data do not support the potential detection of rare fetal chromosomal abnormalities as a reason to favour nuchal translucency-based first trimester screening over NIPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7937980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79379802021-03-16 Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods? Kane, Daniel D’Alton, Mary E. Malone, Fergal D. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of first trimester combined screening for the detection of rare chromosomal abnormalities, other than Trisomies 21, 18 or 13 or 45 × . STUDY DESIGN: A database containing 36,254 pregnancies was analyzed. These patients were recruited at 15 US centers and included singleton pregnancies from 10 3/7–13 6/7 weeks. All patients had a nuchal translucency (NT) scan and those without a cystic hygroma (N = 36,120) underwent a combined first trimester screening test ('FTS' - NT, PAPP-A and fbHCG). A risk cut-off of 1:300, which was used for defining high risk for Trisomy 21, was also used to evaluate the detection rate for rare chromosomal abnormalities using the combined FTS test. RESULTS: 36,120 patients underwent combined FTS. Of these, 123 were found to have one of the following chromosomal abnormalities: Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13 or Turner syndrome. This study focuses on 40 additional patients who were found to have ‘other’ rare chromosomal abnormalities such as triploidy, structural chromosomal abnormalities, sex chromosome abnormalities or unusual chromosomal abnormalities (e.g. 47XX + 16), giving an incidence of 1.1 in 1000 for these rare chromosomal abnormalities. Of these 40 pregnancies, only 2 (5%) had an NT measurement of ≥3 mm. The detection rate for combined FTS, using a risk cut-off of ≥1:300, was 35 % (14 of 40 cases). Therefore, 65 % of cases of rarer fetal chromosomal abnormalities had a ‘normal’ combined FTS risk (<1:300) and 95 % had a ‘normal’ NT (<3 mm). CONCLUSION: Traditional FTS methods are unable to identify the vast majority of rare chromosomal abnormalities. Our data do not support the potential detection of rare fetal chromosomal abnormalities as a reason to favour nuchal translucency-based first trimester screening over NIPT. Elsevier 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7937980/ /pubmed/33733087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100123 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
Kane, Daniel
D’Alton, Mary E.
Malone, Fergal D.
Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
title Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
title_full Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
title_fullStr Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
title_full_unstemmed Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
title_short Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
title_sort rare chromosomal abnormalities: can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
topic Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100123
work_keys_str_mv AT kanedaniel rarechromosomalabnormalitiescantheybeidentifiedusingconventionalfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningmethods
AT daltonmarye rarechromosomalabnormalitiescantheybeidentifiedusingconventionalfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningmethods
AT malonefergald rarechromosomalabnormalitiescantheybeidentifiedusingconventionalfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningmethods