Cargando…
<Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
We aimed to determine available evidences in the literature regarding surgical approaches and methods, timing of surgical interventions, duration of perioperative antibiotics, and duration of nonsurgical treatments (antibiotics administration) in patients with upper cervical (occiput–C2) epidural ab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nagoya University
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727733 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.83.1.1 |
_version_ | 1783661530965868544 |
---|---|
author | Kobayashi, Takaomi Ureshino, Hiroshi Morimoto, Tadatsugu Shimanoe, Chisato Ikuta, Ko Sonohata, Motoki Mawatari, Masaaki |
author_facet | Kobayashi, Takaomi Ureshino, Hiroshi Morimoto, Tadatsugu Shimanoe, Chisato Ikuta, Ko Sonohata, Motoki Mawatari, Masaaki |
author_sort | Kobayashi, Takaomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to determine available evidences in the literature regarding surgical approaches and methods, timing of surgical interventions, duration of perioperative antibiotics, and duration of nonsurgical treatments (antibiotics administration) in patients with upper cervical (occiput–C2) epidural abscess (UCEA). We performed a literature review of the articles on surgical interventions and antibiotic therapy to treat UCEA, searching the PubMed database for relevant articles published in the English language (as of March 2020). In total, 53 patients with UCEA were identified. Permanent limb paralysis or death was observed in 1/15 (6.7%) patients who received the transoral approach and 2/15 (13.3%) patients who received the transcervical approach, 1/26 (3.8%) patients who underwent surgery before the onset of paralysis, and 2/4 (50.0%) patients who underwent surgery after the onset of paralysis. In 85%–89% of cases, antibiotic administration was continued for 6–12 weeks, which was determined by the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Differences in surgical approaches may not be associated with the incidence of permanent limb paralysis or death. Surgical interventions before limb paralysis onset are recommended in UCEA patients. In perioperative and nonoperative treatments, antibiotic administration for 6–12 weeks may be supported based on the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Further investigations are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7938088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nagoya University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79380882021-03-15 <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review Kobayashi, Takaomi Ureshino, Hiroshi Morimoto, Tadatsugu Shimanoe, Chisato Ikuta, Ko Sonohata, Motoki Mawatari, Masaaki Nagoya J Med Sci Review Article We aimed to determine available evidences in the literature regarding surgical approaches and methods, timing of surgical interventions, duration of perioperative antibiotics, and duration of nonsurgical treatments (antibiotics administration) in patients with upper cervical (occiput–C2) epidural abscess (UCEA). We performed a literature review of the articles on surgical interventions and antibiotic therapy to treat UCEA, searching the PubMed database for relevant articles published in the English language (as of March 2020). In total, 53 patients with UCEA were identified. Permanent limb paralysis or death was observed in 1/15 (6.7%) patients who received the transoral approach and 2/15 (13.3%) patients who received the transcervical approach, 1/26 (3.8%) patients who underwent surgery before the onset of paralysis, and 2/4 (50.0%) patients who underwent surgery after the onset of paralysis. In 85%–89% of cases, antibiotic administration was continued for 6–12 weeks, which was determined by the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Differences in surgical approaches may not be associated with the incidence of permanent limb paralysis or death. Surgical interventions before limb paralysis onset are recommended in UCEA patients. In perioperative and nonoperative treatments, antibiotic administration for 6–12 weeks may be supported based on the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Further investigations are needed. Nagoya University 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7938088/ /pubmed/33727733 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.83.1.1 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Kobayashi, Takaomi Ureshino, Hiroshi Morimoto, Tadatsugu Shimanoe, Chisato Ikuta, Ko Sonohata, Motoki Mawatari, Masaaki <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review |
title | <Editors’ Choice>
Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
|
title_full | <Editors’ Choice>
Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
|
title_fullStr | <Editors’ Choice>
Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
|
title_full_unstemmed | <Editors’ Choice>
Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
|
title_short | <Editors’ Choice>
Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
|
title_sort | <editors’ choice>
treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727733 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.83.1.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobayashitakaomi editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview AT ureshinohiroshi editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview AT morimototadatsugu editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview AT shimanoechisato editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview AT ikutako editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview AT sonohatamotoki editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview AT mawatarimasaaki editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview |