Cargando…

<Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review

We aimed to determine available evidences in the literature regarding surgical approaches and methods, timing of surgical interventions, duration of perioperative antibiotics, and duration of nonsurgical treatments (antibiotics administration) in patients with upper cervical (occiput–C2) epidural ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Takaomi, Ureshino, Hiroshi, Morimoto, Tadatsugu, Shimanoe, Chisato, Ikuta, Ko, Sonohata, Motoki, Mawatari, Masaaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nagoya University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727733
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.83.1.1
_version_ 1783661530965868544
author Kobayashi, Takaomi
Ureshino, Hiroshi
Morimoto, Tadatsugu
Shimanoe, Chisato
Ikuta, Ko
Sonohata, Motoki
Mawatari, Masaaki
author_facet Kobayashi, Takaomi
Ureshino, Hiroshi
Morimoto, Tadatsugu
Shimanoe, Chisato
Ikuta, Ko
Sonohata, Motoki
Mawatari, Masaaki
author_sort Kobayashi, Takaomi
collection PubMed
description We aimed to determine available evidences in the literature regarding surgical approaches and methods, timing of surgical interventions, duration of perioperative antibiotics, and duration of nonsurgical treatments (antibiotics administration) in patients with upper cervical (occiput–C2) epidural abscess (UCEA). We performed a literature review of the articles on surgical interventions and antibiotic therapy to treat UCEA, searching the PubMed database for relevant articles published in the English language (as of March 2020). In total, 53 patients with UCEA were identified. Permanent limb paralysis or death was observed in 1/15 (6.7%) patients who received the transoral approach and 2/15 (13.3%) patients who received the transcervical approach, 1/26 (3.8%) patients who underwent surgery before the onset of paralysis, and 2/4 (50.0%) patients who underwent surgery after the onset of paralysis. In 85%–89% of cases, antibiotic administration was continued for 6–12 weeks, which was determined by the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Differences in surgical approaches may not be associated with the incidence of permanent limb paralysis or death. Surgical interventions before limb paralysis onset are recommended in UCEA patients. In perioperative and nonoperative treatments, antibiotic administration for 6–12 weeks may be supported based on the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Further investigations are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7938088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nagoya University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79380882021-03-15 <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review Kobayashi, Takaomi Ureshino, Hiroshi Morimoto, Tadatsugu Shimanoe, Chisato Ikuta, Ko Sonohata, Motoki Mawatari, Masaaki Nagoya J Med Sci Review Article We aimed to determine available evidences in the literature regarding surgical approaches and methods, timing of surgical interventions, duration of perioperative antibiotics, and duration of nonsurgical treatments (antibiotics administration) in patients with upper cervical (occiput–C2) epidural abscess (UCEA). We performed a literature review of the articles on surgical interventions and antibiotic therapy to treat UCEA, searching the PubMed database for relevant articles published in the English language (as of March 2020). In total, 53 patients with UCEA were identified. Permanent limb paralysis or death was observed in 1/15 (6.7%) patients who received the transoral approach and 2/15 (13.3%) patients who received the transcervical approach, 1/26 (3.8%) patients who underwent surgery before the onset of paralysis, and 2/4 (50.0%) patients who underwent surgery after the onset of paralysis. In 85%–89% of cases, antibiotic administration was continued for 6–12 weeks, which was determined by the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Differences in surgical approaches may not be associated with the incidence of permanent limb paralysis or death. Surgical interventions before limb paralysis onset are recommended in UCEA patients. In perioperative and nonoperative treatments, antibiotic administration for 6–12 weeks may be supported based on the confirmation of reduced inflammatory response and/or abscess disappearance on imaging. Further investigations are needed. Nagoya University 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7938088/ /pubmed/33727733 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.83.1.1 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Kobayashi, Takaomi
Ureshino, Hiroshi
Morimoto, Tadatsugu
Shimanoe, Chisato
Ikuta, Ko
Sonohata, Motoki
Mawatari, Masaaki
<Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
title <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
title_full <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
title_fullStr <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
title_short <Editors’ Choice> Treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
title_sort <editors’ choice> treatment strategy for upper cervical epidural abscess: a literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727733
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.83.1.1
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashitakaomi editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview
AT ureshinohiroshi editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview
AT morimototadatsugu editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview
AT shimanoechisato editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview
AT ikutako editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview
AT sonohatamotoki editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview
AT mawatarimasaaki editorschoicetreatmentstrategyforuppercervicalepiduralabscessaliteraturereview