Cargando…
Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for educational materials and methods that can replace clinical clerkships (CCs) for online simulated clinical practice (online-sCP). This study evaluates the impact of using simulated electronic health records (sEHR) for inpatients, and electroni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02586-y |
_version_ | 1783661565316169728 |
---|---|
author | Kasai, Hajime Shikino, Kiyoshi Saito, Go Tsukamoto, Tomoko Takahashi, Yukiko Kuriyama, Ayaka Tanaka, Kazuhisa Onodera, Misaki Yokoh, Hidetaka Tatusmi, Koichiro Yoshino, Ichiro Ikusaka, Masatomi Sakao, Seiichiro Ito, Shoichi |
author_facet | Kasai, Hajime Shikino, Kiyoshi Saito, Go Tsukamoto, Tomoko Takahashi, Yukiko Kuriyama, Ayaka Tanaka, Kazuhisa Onodera, Misaki Yokoh, Hidetaka Tatusmi, Koichiro Yoshino, Ichiro Ikusaka, Masatomi Sakao, Seiichiro Ito, Shoichi |
author_sort | Kasai, Hajime |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for educational materials and methods that can replace clinical clerkships (CCs) for online simulated clinical practice (online-sCP). This study evaluates the impact of using simulated electronic health records (sEHR) for inpatients, and electronic problem-based learning (e-PBL) and online virtual medical interviews (online-VMI) for outpatients, for an online-sCP using a learning management system (LMS) and online meeting system facilitated by a supervising physician. METHODS: The sEHR was reviewed by medical students and subsequently discussed with a supervising physician using an online meeting system. In the e-PBL, medical students reviewed the simulated patients and discussed on the LMS. For the online-VMI, a faculty member acted as an outpatient and a student acted as the doctor. Small groups of students discussed the clinical reasoning process using the online meeting system. A mixed-method design was implemented. Medical students self-assessed their clinical competence before and after the online-sCP. They answered questionnaires and participated in semi-structured focus group interviews (FGIs) regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the practice. RESULTS: Forty-three students completed the online-sCP during May and June 2020. All students indicated significant improvement in all aspects of self-evaluation of clinical performance after the online-sCP. Students using sEHR reported significant improvement in writing daily medical records and medical summaries. Students using e-PBL and online-VMI reported significant improvement in medical interviews and counseling. Students also indicated CCs as more useful for learning associated with medical interviews, physical examinations, and humanistic qualities like professionalism than the online-sCP. Eight FGIs were conducted (n = 42). The advantages of online-sCP were segregated into five categories (learning environment, efficiency, accessibility, self-paced learning, and interactivity); meanwhile, the disadvantages of online-sCP were classified into seven categories (clinical practice experience, learning environment, interactivity, motivation, memory retention, accessibility, and extraneous cognitive load). CONCLUSIONS: Online-sCP with sEHR, e-PBL, and online-VMI could be useful in learning some of the clinical skills acquired through CC. These methods can be implemented with limited preparation and resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02586-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7938264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79382642021-03-08 Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method Kasai, Hajime Shikino, Kiyoshi Saito, Go Tsukamoto, Tomoko Takahashi, Yukiko Kuriyama, Ayaka Tanaka, Kazuhisa Onodera, Misaki Yokoh, Hidetaka Tatusmi, Koichiro Yoshino, Ichiro Ikusaka, Masatomi Sakao, Seiichiro Ito, Shoichi BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for educational materials and methods that can replace clinical clerkships (CCs) for online simulated clinical practice (online-sCP). This study evaluates the impact of using simulated electronic health records (sEHR) for inpatients, and electronic problem-based learning (e-PBL) and online virtual medical interviews (online-VMI) for outpatients, for an online-sCP using a learning management system (LMS) and online meeting system facilitated by a supervising physician. METHODS: The sEHR was reviewed by medical students and subsequently discussed with a supervising physician using an online meeting system. In the e-PBL, medical students reviewed the simulated patients and discussed on the LMS. For the online-VMI, a faculty member acted as an outpatient and a student acted as the doctor. Small groups of students discussed the clinical reasoning process using the online meeting system. A mixed-method design was implemented. Medical students self-assessed their clinical competence before and after the online-sCP. They answered questionnaires and participated in semi-structured focus group interviews (FGIs) regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the practice. RESULTS: Forty-three students completed the online-sCP during May and June 2020. All students indicated significant improvement in all aspects of self-evaluation of clinical performance after the online-sCP. Students using sEHR reported significant improvement in writing daily medical records and medical summaries. Students using e-PBL and online-VMI reported significant improvement in medical interviews and counseling. Students also indicated CCs as more useful for learning associated with medical interviews, physical examinations, and humanistic qualities like professionalism than the online-sCP. Eight FGIs were conducted (n = 42). The advantages of online-sCP were segregated into five categories (learning environment, efficiency, accessibility, self-paced learning, and interactivity); meanwhile, the disadvantages of online-sCP were classified into seven categories (clinical practice experience, learning environment, interactivity, motivation, memory retention, accessibility, and extraneous cognitive load). CONCLUSIONS: Online-sCP with sEHR, e-PBL, and online-VMI could be useful in learning some of the clinical skills acquired through CC. These methods can be implemented with limited preparation and resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02586-y. BioMed Central 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7938264/ /pubmed/33685442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02586-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kasai, Hajime Shikino, Kiyoshi Saito, Go Tsukamoto, Tomoko Takahashi, Yukiko Kuriyama, Ayaka Tanaka, Kazuhisa Onodera, Misaki Yokoh, Hidetaka Tatusmi, Koichiro Yoshino, Ichiro Ikusaka, Masatomi Sakao, Seiichiro Ito, Shoichi Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method |
title | Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method |
title_full | Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method |
title_fullStr | Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method |
title_short | Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—A mixed method |
title_sort | alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the covid-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—a mixed method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02586-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasaihajime alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT shikinokiyoshi alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT saitogo alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT tsukamototomoko alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT takahashiyukiko alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT kuriyamaayaka alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT tanakakazuhisa alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT onoderamisaki alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT yokohhidetaka alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT tatusmikoichiro alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT yoshinoichiro alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT ikusakamasatomi alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT sakaoseiichiro alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod AT itoshoichi alternativeapproachesforclinicalclerkshipduringthecovid19pandemiconlinesimulatedclinicalpracticeforinpatientsandoutpatientsamixedmethod |