Cargando…

Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies

Introduction: Drug checking as a part of drug harm-reduction strategies represents an essential aspect of public health policies. It focuses on rapid identification of drugs that individuals intend to use during night events, in order to implement health-protective behaviors. Chemical drug analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fregonese, Martina, Albino, Andrea, Covino, Claudia, Gili, Alessio, Bacci, Mauro, Nicoletti, Alessia, Gambelunghe, Cristiana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.596895
_version_ 1783661577138864128
author Fregonese, Martina
Albino, Andrea
Covino, Claudia
Gili, Alessio
Bacci, Mauro
Nicoletti, Alessia
Gambelunghe, Cristiana
author_facet Fregonese, Martina
Albino, Andrea
Covino, Claudia
Gili, Alessio
Bacci, Mauro
Nicoletti, Alessia
Gambelunghe, Cristiana
author_sort Fregonese, Martina
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Drug checking as a part of drug harm-reduction strategies represents an essential aspect of public health policies. It focuses on rapid identification of drugs that individuals intend to use during night events, in order to implement health-protective behaviors. Chemical drug analysis techniques vary considerably, from simple colorimetric reagents to advanced forensic methods such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Materials and Methods: In 2019, drug-check services were offered at some night events in Umbria (Central Italy). One hundred and twenty attendees directly delivered unidentified substances to a harm-reduction worker, who collected a few milligrams of the substances on ceramic plates and added a drop of colorimetric reagent. Multiple reagents were used to increase the diagnostic capacity of a substance, which may react with a specific drug or a few drugs. Later, a fraction of the samples was analyzed by GC/MS. The concordance of the results obtained using these two methodologies and the intended behaviors of consumers after being informed of the test result was evaluated. Results: We analyzed 120 samples by colorimetric test: 32 MDMA, 25 ketamine, 10 amphetamine, 11 cocaine, 8 heroin, and 4 LSD samples. The results were inconclusive for 29 samples. The GS/MS analysis confirmed MDMA in 84%, ketamine in 78%, amphetamine in 91%, cocaine in 92%, heroin in 88%, and LSD in 100% of the samples. The results of samples with inconclusive results were as follows: 2, MDMA; 7, ketamine; 2, amphetamine; 2, cocaine; 2, heroin; 2, mephedrone; 6, mixes; 1, debris; and 5, adulterants as the main component. Twenty-one of 29 participants reported that they had no intention of consuming the unidentified substance. Discussion: The high percentage of individuals who claimed no intention of consuming the unidentified drugs indicates that drug checking is viable as a part of drug harm-reduction strategies. Overall, colorimetric reagents showed a good performance with regard to samples being unadulterated (LSD) or minimal in quantity, but failed to identify mixtures of substances and the adulterants present in them. Therefore, the use of more discriminatory on-site methods such as Raman or infrared spectrometry is strongly recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7938318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79383182021-03-09 Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies Fregonese, Martina Albino, Andrea Covino, Claudia Gili, Alessio Bacci, Mauro Nicoletti, Alessia Gambelunghe, Cristiana Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Introduction: Drug checking as a part of drug harm-reduction strategies represents an essential aspect of public health policies. It focuses on rapid identification of drugs that individuals intend to use during night events, in order to implement health-protective behaviors. Chemical drug analysis techniques vary considerably, from simple colorimetric reagents to advanced forensic methods such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Materials and Methods: In 2019, drug-check services were offered at some night events in Umbria (Central Italy). One hundred and twenty attendees directly delivered unidentified substances to a harm-reduction worker, who collected a few milligrams of the substances on ceramic plates and added a drop of colorimetric reagent. Multiple reagents were used to increase the diagnostic capacity of a substance, which may react with a specific drug or a few drugs. Later, a fraction of the samples was analyzed by GC/MS. The concordance of the results obtained using these two methodologies and the intended behaviors of consumers after being informed of the test result was evaluated. Results: We analyzed 120 samples by colorimetric test: 32 MDMA, 25 ketamine, 10 amphetamine, 11 cocaine, 8 heroin, and 4 LSD samples. The results were inconclusive for 29 samples. The GS/MS analysis confirmed MDMA in 84%, ketamine in 78%, amphetamine in 91%, cocaine in 92%, heroin in 88%, and LSD in 100% of the samples. The results of samples with inconclusive results were as follows: 2, MDMA; 7, ketamine; 2, amphetamine; 2, cocaine; 2, heroin; 2, mephedrone; 6, mixes; 1, debris; and 5, adulterants as the main component. Twenty-one of 29 participants reported that they had no intention of consuming the unidentified substance. Discussion: The high percentage of individuals who claimed no intention of consuming the unidentified drugs indicates that drug checking is viable as a part of drug harm-reduction strategies. Overall, colorimetric reagents showed a good performance with regard to samples being unadulterated (LSD) or minimal in quantity, but failed to identify mixtures of substances and the adulterants present in them. Therefore, the use of more discriminatory on-site methods such as Raman or infrared spectrometry is strongly recommended. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7938318/ /pubmed/33692707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.596895 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fregonese, Albino, Covino, Gili, Bacci, Nicoletti and Gambelunghe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Fregonese, Martina
Albino, Andrea
Covino, Claudia
Gili, Alessio
Bacci, Mauro
Nicoletti, Alessia
Gambelunghe, Cristiana
Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies
title Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies
title_full Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies
title_fullStr Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies
title_short Drug Checking as Strategy for Harm Reduction in Recreational Contests: Evaluation of Two Different Drug Analysis Methodologies
title_sort drug checking as strategy for harm reduction in recreational contests: evaluation of two different drug analysis methodologies
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.596895
work_keys_str_mv AT fregonesemartina drugcheckingasstrategyforharmreductioninrecreationalcontestsevaluationoftwodifferentdruganalysismethodologies
AT albinoandrea drugcheckingasstrategyforharmreductioninrecreationalcontestsevaluationoftwodifferentdruganalysismethodologies
AT covinoclaudia drugcheckingasstrategyforharmreductioninrecreationalcontestsevaluationoftwodifferentdruganalysismethodologies
AT gilialessio drugcheckingasstrategyforharmreductioninrecreationalcontestsevaluationoftwodifferentdruganalysismethodologies
AT baccimauro drugcheckingasstrategyforharmreductioninrecreationalcontestsevaluationoftwodifferentdruganalysismethodologies
AT nicolettialessia drugcheckingasstrategyforharmreductioninrecreationalcontestsevaluationoftwodifferentdruganalysismethodologies
AT gambelunghecristiana drugcheckingasstrategyforharmreductioninrecreationalcontestsevaluationoftwodifferentdruganalysismethodologies