Cargando…

An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process

BACKGROUND: In meeting input data requirements for a system dynamics (SD) model simulating the radiotherapy (RT) process, the number of patient care pathways (RT workflows) needs to be kept low to simplify the model without affecting the overall performance. A large RT department can have more than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindberg, Jesper, Holmström, Paul, Hallberg, Stefan, Björk-Eriksson, Thomas, Olsson, Caroline E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06162-4
_version_ 1783661609445490688
author Lindberg, Jesper
Holmström, Paul
Hallberg, Stefan
Björk-Eriksson, Thomas
Olsson, Caroline E.
author_facet Lindberg, Jesper
Holmström, Paul
Hallberg, Stefan
Björk-Eriksson, Thomas
Olsson, Caroline E.
author_sort Lindberg, Jesper
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In meeting input data requirements for a system dynamics (SD) model simulating the radiotherapy (RT) process, the number of patient care pathways (RT workflows) needs to be kept low to simplify the model without affecting the overall performance. A large RT department can have more than 100 workflows, which results in a complex model structure if each is to be handled separately. Here we investigated effects on model performance by reducing the number of workflows for a model of the preparatory steps of the RT process. METHODS: We created a SD model sub-structure capturing the preparatory RT process. Real data for patients treated in 2015-2016 at a modern RT department in Sweden were used. RT workflow similarity was quantified by averaged pairwise utilization rate differences (%) and the size of corresponding correlation coefficients (r). Grouping of RT workflows was determined using two accepted strategies (80/20 Pareto rule; merging all data into one group) and a customized algorithm with r≥0.75:0.05:0.95 as criteria for group inclusion by two strategies (A1 and A2). Number of waiting patients for each grouping strategy were compared to the reference of all workflows handled separately. RESULTS: There were 128 RT workflows for 3209 patients during the studied period. The 80/20 Pareto rule resulted in 14/8/21 groups for curative/palliative/disregarding treatment intent. Correspondingly, A1 and A2 resulted in 7-40/≤4-36/7-82 groups depending on r cutoff. Results for the Pareto rule and A2 at r≥85 were comparable to the reference. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a simulation model over the RT process will depend on the grouping strategy of patient input data. Either the Pareto rule or the grouping of patients by resource use can be expected to better reflect overall departmental effects to various changes than when merging all data into one group. Our proposed approach to identify groups based on similarity in resource use can potentially be used in any setting with variable incoming flows of objects which go through a multi-step process comparable to RT where the aim is to reduce the complexity of associated model structures without compromising with overall performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06162-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7938525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79385252021-03-09 An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process Lindberg, Jesper Holmström, Paul Hallberg, Stefan Björk-Eriksson, Thomas Olsson, Caroline E. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In meeting input data requirements for a system dynamics (SD) model simulating the radiotherapy (RT) process, the number of patient care pathways (RT workflows) needs to be kept low to simplify the model without affecting the overall performance. A large RT department can have more than 100 workflows, which results in a complex model structure if each is to be handled separately. Here we investigated effects on model performance by reducing the number of workflows for a model of the preparatory steps of the RT process. METHODS: We created a SD model sub-structure capturing the preparatory RT process. Real data for patients treated in 2015-2016 at a modern RT department in Sweden were used. RT workflow similarity was quantified by averaged pairwise utilization rate differences (%) and the size of corresponding correlation coefficients (r). Grouping of RT workflows was determined using two accepted strategies (80/20 Pareto rule; merging all data into one group) and a customized algorithm with r≥0.75:0.05:0.95 as criteria for group inclusion by two strategies (A1 and A2). Number of waiting patients for each grouping strategy were compared to the reference of all workflows handled separately. RESULTS: There were 128 RT workflows for 3209 patients during the studied period. The 80/20 Pareto rule resulted in 14/8/21 groups for curative/palliative/disregarding treatment intent. Correspondingly, A1 and A2 resulted in 7-40/≤4-36/7-82 groups depending on r cutoff. Results for the Pareto rule and A2 at r≥85 were comparable to the reference. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a simulation model over the RT process will depend on the grouping strategy of patient input data. Either the Pareto rule or the grouping of patients by resource use can be expected to better reflect overall departmental effects to various changes than when merging all data into one group. Our proposed approach to identify groups based on similarity in resource use can potentially be used in any setting with variable incoming flows of objects which go through a multi-step process comparable to RT where the aim is to reduce the complexity of associated model structures without compromising with overall performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06162-4. BioMed Central 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7938525/ /pubmed/33685475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06162-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lindberg, Jesper
Holmström, Paul
Hallberg, Stefan
Björk-Eriksson, Thomas
Olsson, Caroline E.
An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process
title An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process
title_full An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process
title_fullStr An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process
title_full_unstemmed An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process
title_short An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process
title_sort analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06162-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lindbergjesper ananalyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT holmstrompaul ananalyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT hallbergstefan ananalyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT bjorkerikssonthomas ananalyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT olssoncarolinee ananalyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT lindbergjesper analyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT holmstrompaul analyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT hallbergstefan analyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT bjorkerikssonthomas analyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess
AT olssoncarolinee analyticalapproachtoaggregatepatientinflowstoasimulationmodelovertheradiotherapyprocess