Cargando…

Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the presented investigation is to evaluate the resulting torque on loaded 3D printed springs using different coil thickness and length. METHODS: Specimens were designed and printed using the 3D printer MAX (Asiga, Sydney, Australia) with 3D printable, experimental, flexibl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Othman, Ahmed, Hartman, Steven, Ströbele, Dragan, Arnold, Jassin, See, von
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01473-8
_version_ 1783661616330440704
author Othman, Ahmed
Hartman, Steven
Ströbele, Dragan
Arnold, Jassin
See, von
author_facet Othman, Ahmed
Hartman, Steven
Ströbele, Dragan
Arnold, Jassin
See, von
author_sort Othman, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the presented investigation is to evaluate the resulting torque on loaded 3D printed springs using different coil thickness and length. METHODS: Specimens were designed and printed using the 3D printer MAX (Asiga, Sydney, Australia) with 3D printable, experimental, flexible material (Code:BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided into three groups according to spring coil design. Control group (n = 18), length group (n = 19) and thickness group (n = 22). Groups were tested using a Sauter Machine for torque calculation (DB, Grindelwald, Switzerland) in conjunction with a universal testing machine (Zwick Z010, Ulm, Germany) for clock-wise and anti-clockwise testing. Statistical analysis was performed using the Steel–Dwass test to compare median values of the three groups in both testing directions (p < 0.001). RESULTS: The highest torque value was determined in the thickness group for both clockwise and anti-clockwise testing directions, achieving 44.00 N/mm and 39.62 N/mm respectively. The length group ranged from 21.65 to 11.04 N/mm in clockwise direction and from 18.04 to 11.38 N/mm in counter-clockwise testing. The control group ranged from 22.72 to 17.18 N/mm in the clock-wise direction while in the anti-clock wise testing it ranged from 21.34 to 16.02 N/mm. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of torque produced from the computer aided designing/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) springs is being affected by diameter more than the length design parameter in comparison to the control group. The values of the thickness group are significantly higher than those of the length group (P < 0.001).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7938560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79385602021-03-09 Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study Othman, Ahmed Hartman, Steven Ströbele, Dragan Arnold, Jassin See, von BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the presented investigation is to evaluate the resulting torque on loaded 3D printed springs using different coil thickness and length. METHODS: Specimens were designed and printed using the 3D printer MAX (Asiga, Sydney, Australia) with 3D printable, experimental, flexible material (Code:BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided into three groups according to spring coil design. Control group (n = 18), length group (n = 19) and thickness group (n = 22). Groups were tested using a Sauter Machine for torque calculation (DB, Grindelwald, Switzerland) in conjunction with a universal testing machine (Zwick Z010, Ulm, Germany) for clock-wise and anti-clockwise testing. Statistical analysis was performed using the Steel–Dwass test to compare median values of the three groups in both testing directions (p < 0.001). RESULTS: The highest torque value was determined in the thickness group for both clockwise and anti-clockwise testing directions, achieving 44.00 N/mm and 39.62 N/mm respectively. The length group ranged from 21.65 to 11.04 N/mm in clockwise direction and from 18.04 to 11.38 N/mm in counter-clockwise testing. The control group ranged from 22.72 to 17.18 N/mm in the clock-wise direction while in the anti-clock wise testing it ranged from 21.34 to 16.02 N/mm. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of torque produced from the computer aided designing/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) springs is being affected by diameter more than the length design parameter in comparison to the control group. The values of the thickness group are significantly higher than those of the length group (P < 0.001). BioMed Central 2021-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7938560/ /pubmed/33678167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01473-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Othman, Ahmed
Hartman, Steven
Ströbele, Dragan
Arnold, Jassin
See, von
Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study
title Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study
title_full Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study
title_fullStr Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study
title_short Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study
title_sort preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3d printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01473-8
work_keys_str_mv AT othmanahmed preliminaryfeasibilitytorquemechanicalevaluationfor3dprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentparametersinvitrostudy
AT hartmansteven preliminaryfeasibilitytorquemechanicalevaluationfor3dprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentparametersinvitrostudy
AT strobeledragan preliminaryfeasibilitytorquemechanicalevaluationfor3dprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentparametersinvitrostudy
AT arnoldjassin preliminaryfeasibilitytorquemechanicalevaluationfor3dprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentparametersinvitrostudy
AT seevon preliminaryfeasibilitytorquemechanicalevaluationfor3dprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentparametersinvitrostudy