Cargando…
Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication. METHODS: We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6 |
_version_ | 1783661618667716608 |
---|---|
author | An, Lin Yin, Wei-tian Sun, Da-wei |
author_facet | An, Lin Yin, Wei-tian Sun, Da-wei |
author_sort | An, Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication. METHODS: We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to May 24th, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and synthesized using STATA 14, values were then pooled and utilized in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient’s prognosis. RESULTS: In total, 18 studies involving 25 cohorts with 7019 cases were incorporated. Pooled results originated from both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = 2.14, 95%CI:1.83–2.51, random-effects model; HR = 1.93, 95%CI:1.75–2.12, fixed-effects model; respectively) suggested that decreased AAPR had adverse effect on overall survival (OS). Similarly, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analysis of fixed-effects model, evinced that decreased AAPR also had adverse effect on disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.60–2.04, I(2) = 29.5%, P = 0.174; HR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.45–1.97, I(2) = 13.0%, P = 0.330; respectively), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.71, 95%CI:1.31–2.22, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.754; HR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.16–3.12, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.339; respectively), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 2.22, 95%CI:1.67–2.95, I(2) = 5.6%, P = 0.347; HR = 1.88, 95%CI:1.38–2.57, I(2) = 26.4%, P = 0.244; respectively). Admittedly, heterogeneity and publication bias existed, but stratification of univariate meta-analytic results, as well as adjusted meta-analytic results via trim and fill method, all showed that AAPR still significantly correlated with poor OS despite of confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, decreased AAPR had adverse effect on prognosis in cancer patients. As an inexpensive and convenient ratio derived from liver function test, AAPR might become a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7938577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79385772021-03-09 Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? An, Lin Yin, Wei-tian Sun, Da-wei BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication. METHODS: We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to May 24th, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and synthesized using STATA 14, values were then pooled and utilized in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient’s prognosis. RESULTS: In total, 18 studies involving 25 cohorts with 7019 cases were incorporated. Pooled results originated from both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = 2.14, 95%CI:1.83–2.51, random-effects model; HR = 1.93, 95%CI:1.75–2.12, fixed-effects model; respectively) suggested that decreased AAPR had adverse effect on overall survival (OS). Similarly, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analysis of fixed-effects model, evinced that decreased AAPR also had adverse effect on disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.60–2.04, I(2) = 29.5%, P = 0.174; HR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.45–1.97, I(2) = 13.0%, P = 0.330; respectively), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.71, 95%CI:1.31–2.22, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.754; HR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.16–3.12, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.339; respectively), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 2.22, 95%CI:1.67–2.95, I(2) = 5.6%, P = 0.347; HR = 1.88, 95%CI:1.38–2.57, I(2) = 26.4%, P = 0.244; respectively). Admittedly, heterogeneity and publication bias existed, but stratification of univariate meta-analytic results, as well as adjusted meta-analytic results via trim and fill method, all showed that AAPR still significantly correlated with poor OS despite of confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, decreased AAPR had adverse effect on prognosis in cancer patients. As an inexpensive and convenient ratio derived from liver function test, AAPR might become a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6. BioMed Central 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7938577/ /pubmed/33685425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article An, Lin Yin, Wei-tian Sun, Da-wei Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? |
title | Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? |
title_full | Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? |
title_fullStr | Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? |
title_full_unstemmed | Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? |
title_short | Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? |
title_sort | albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anlin albumintoalkalinephosphataseratioasapromisingindicatorofprognosisinhumancancersisitpossible AT yinweitian albumintoalkalinephosphataseratioasapromisingindicatorofprognosisinhumancancersisitpossible AT sundawei albumintoalkalinephosphataseratioasapromisingindicatorofprognosisinhumancancersisitpossible |