Cargando…

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?

BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication. METHODS: We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Lin, Yin, Wei-tian, Sun, Da-wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6
_version_ 1783661618667716608
author An, Lin
Yin, Wei-tian
Sun, Da-wei
author_facet An, Lin
Yin, Wei-tian
Sun, Da-wei
author_sort An, Lin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication. METHODS: We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to May 24th, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and synthesized using STATA 14, values were then pooled and utilized in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient’s prognosis. RESULTS: In total, 18 studies involving 25 cohorts with 7019 cases were incorporated. Pooled results originated from both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = 2.14, 95%CI:1.83–2.51, random-effects model; HR = 1.93, 95%CI:1.75–2.12, fixed-effects model; respectively) suggested that decreased AAPR had adverse effect on overall survival (OS). Similarly, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analysis of fixed-effects model, evinced that decreased AAPR also had adverse effect on disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.60–2.04, I(2) = 29.5%, P = 0.174; HR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.45–1.97, I(2) = 13.0%, P = 0.330; respectively), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.71, 95%CI:1.31–2.22, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.754; HR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.16–3.12, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.339; respectively), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 2.22, 95%CI:1.67–2.95, I(2) = 5.6%, P = 0.347; HR = 1.88, 95%CI:1.38–2.57, I(2) = 26.4%, P = 0.244; respectively). Admittedly, heterogeneity and publication bias existed, but stratification of univariate meta-analytic results, as well as adjusted meta-analytic results via trim and fill method, all showed that AAPR still significantly correlated with poor OS despite of confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, decreased AAPR had adverse effect on prognosis in cancer patients. As an inexpensive and convenient ratio derived from liver function test, AAPR might become a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7938577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79385772021-03-09 Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible? An, Lin Yin, Wei-tian Sun, Da-wei BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication. METHODS: We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to May 24th, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and synthesized using STATA 14, values were then pooled and utilized in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient’s prognosis. RESULTS: In total, 18 studies involving 25 cohorts with 7019 cases were incorporated. Pooled results originated from both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = 2.14, 95%CI:1.83–2.51, random-effects model; HR = 1.93, 95%CI:1.75–2.12, fixed-effects model; respectively) suggested that decreased AAPR had adverse effect on overall survival (OS). Similarly, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analysis of fixed-effects model, evinced that decreased AAPR also had adverse effect on disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.60–2.04, I(2) = 29.5%, P = 0.174; HR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.45–1.97, I(2) = 13.0%, P = 0.330; respectively), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.71, 95%CI:1.31–2.22, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.754; HR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.16–3.12, I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.339; respectively), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 2.22, 95%CI:1.67–2.95, I(2) = 5.6%, P = 0.347; HR = 1.88, 95%CI:1.38–2.57, I(2) = 26.4%, P = 0.244; respectively). Admittedly, heterogeneity and publication bias existed, but stratification of univariate meta-analytic results, as well as adjusted meta-analytic results via trim and fill method, all showed that AAPR still significantly correlated with poor OS despite of confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, decreased AAPR had adverse effect on prognosis in cancer patients. As an inexpensive and convenient ratio derived from liver function test, AAPR might become a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6. BioMed Central 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7938577/ /pubmed/33685425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
An, Lin
Yin, Wei-tian
Sun, Da-wei
Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
title Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
title_full Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
title_fullStr Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
title_full_unstemmed Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
title_short Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
title_sort albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6
work_keys_str_mv AT anlin albumintoalkalinephosphataseratioasapromisingindicatorofprognosisinhumancancersisitpossible
AT yinweitian albumintoalkalinephosphataseratioasapromisingindicatorofprognosisinhumancancersisitpossible
AT sundawei albumintoalkalinephosphataseratioasapromisingindicatorofprognosisinhumancancersisitpossible