Cargando…

Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity

BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the malaria control interventions primarily responsible for reductions in transmission intensity across sub-Saharan Africa. These interventions, however, may have differential impact on Anopheles species compos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mawejje, Henry Ddumba, Kilama, Maxwell, Kigozi, Simon P., Musiime, Alex K., Kamya, Moses, Lines, Jo, Lindsay, Steven W., Smith, David, Dorsey, Grant, Donnelly, Martin J., Staedke, Sarah G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03675-5
_version_ 1783661623756455936
author Mawejje, Henry Ddumba
Kilama, Maxwell
Kigozi, Simon P.
Musiime, Alex K.
Kamya, Moses
Lines, Jo
Lindsay, Steven W.
Smith, David
Dorsey, Grant
Donnelly, Martin J.
Staedke, Sarah G.
author_facet Mawejje, Henry Ddumba
Kilama, Maxwell
Kigozi, Simon P.
Musiime, Alex K.
Kamya, Moses
Lines, Jo
Lindsay, Steven W.
Smith, David
Dorsey, Grant
Donnelly, Martin J.
Staedke, Sarah G.
author_sort Mawejje, Henry Ddumba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the malaria control interventions primarily responsible for reductions in transmission intensity across sub-Saharan Africa. These interventions, however, may have differential impact on Anopheles species composition and density. This study examined the changing pattern of Anopheles species in three areas of Uganda with markedly different transmission intensities and different levels of vector control. METHODS: From October 2011 to June 2016 mosquitoes were collected monthly using CDC light traps from 100 randomly selected households in three areas: Walukuba (low transmission), Kihihi (moderate transmission) and Nagongera (high transmission). LLINs were distributed in November 2013 in Walukuba and Nagongera and in June 2014 in Kihihi. IRS was implemented only in Nagongera, with three rounds of bendiocarb delivered between December 2014 and June 2015. Mosquito species were identified morphologically and by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction). RESULTS: In Walukuba, LLIN distribution was associated with a decline in Anopheles funestus vector density (0.07 vs 0.02 mosquitoes per house per night, density ratio [DR] 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18–0.65, p = 0.001), but not Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) nor Anopheles arabiensis. In Kihihi, over 98% of mosquitoes were An. gambiae s.s. and LLIN distribution was associated with a decline in An. gambiae s.s. vector density (4.00 vs 2.46, DR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49–0.94, p = 0.02). In Nagongera, the combination of LLINs and multiple rounds of IRS was associated with almost complete elimination of An. gambiae s.s. (28.0 vs 0.17, DR 0.004, 95% CI: 0.002–0.009, p < 0.001), and An. funestus sensu lato (s.l.) (3.90 vs 0.006, DR 0.001, 95% CI: 0.0005–0.004, p < 0.001), with a less pronounced decline in An. arabiensis (9.18 vs 2.00, DR 0.15 95% CI: 0.07–0.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LLIN distribution was associated with reductions in An. funestus s.l. in the lowest transmission site and An. gambiae s.s. in the moderate transmission site. In the highest transmission site, a combination of LLINs and multiple rounds of IRS was associated with the near collapse of An. gambiae s.s. and An. funestus s.l. Following IRS, An. arabiensis, a behaviourally resilient vector, became the predominant species, which may have implications for malaria vector control activities. Development of interventions targeted at outdoor biting remains a priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7938603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79386032021-03-09 Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity Mawejje, Henry Ddumba Kilama, Maxwell Kigozi, Simon P. Musiime, Alex K. Kamya, Moses Lines, Jo Lindsay, Steven W. Smith, David Dorsey, Grant Donnelly, Martin J. Staedke, Sarah G. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the malaria control interventions primarily responsible for reductions in transmission intensity across sub-Saharan Africa. These interventions, however, may have differential impact on Anopheles species composition and density. This study examined the changing pattern of Anopheles species in three areas of Uganda with markedly different transmission intensities and different levels of vector control. METHODS: From October 2011 to June 2016 mosquitoes were collected monthly using CDC light traps from 100 randomly selected households in three areas: Walukuba (low transmission), Kihihi (moderate transmission) and Nagongera (high transmission). LLINs were distributed in November 2013 in Walukuba and Nagongera and in June 2014 in Kihihi. IRS was implemented only in Nagongera, with three rounds of bendiocarb delivered between December 2014 and June 2015. Mosquito species were identified morphologically and by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction). RESULTS: In Walukuba, LLIN distribution was associated with a decline in Anopheles funestus vector density (0.07 vs 0.02 mosquitoes per house per night, density ratio [DR] 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18–0.65, p = 0.001), but not Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) nor Anopheles arabiensis. In Kihihi, over 98% of mosquitoes were An. gambiae s.s. and LLIN distribution was associated with a decline in An. gambiae s.s. vector density (4.00 vs 2.46, DR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49–0.94, p = 0.02). In Nagongera, the combination of LLINs and multiple rounds of IRS was associated with almost complete elimination of An. gambiae s.s. (28.0 vs 0.17, DR 0.004, 95% CI: 0.002–0.009, p < 0.001), and An. funestus sensu lato (s.l.) (3.90 vs 0.006, DR 0.001, 95% CI: 0.0005–0.004, p < 0.001), with a less pronounced decline in An. arabiensis (9.18 vs 2.00, DR 0.15 95% CI: 0.07–0.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LLIN distribution was associated with reductions in An. funestus s.l. in the lowest transmission site and An. gambiae s.s. in the moderate transmission site. In the highest transmission site, a combination of LLINs and multiple rounds of IRS was associated with the near collapse of An. gambiae s.s. and An. funestus s.l. Following IRS, An. arabiensis, a behaviourally resilient vector, became the predominant species, which may have implications for malaria vector control activities. Development of interventions targeted at outdoor biting remains a priority. BioMed Central 2021-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7938603/ /pubmed/33678166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03675-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mawejje, Henry Ddumba
Kilama, Maxwell
Kigozi, Simon P.
Musiime, Alex K.
Kamya, Moses
Lines, Jo
Lindsay, Steven W.
Smith, David
Dorsey, Grant
Donnelly, Martin J.
Staedke, Sarah G.
Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity
title Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity
title_full Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity
title_fullStr Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity
title_full_unstemmed Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity
title_short Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity
title_sort impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on anopheles density and species composition from three areas of uganda with differing malaria endemicity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03675-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mawejjehenryddumba impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT kilamamaxwell impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT kigozisimonp impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT musiimealexk impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT kamyamoses impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT linesjo impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT lindsaystevenw impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT smithdavid impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT dorseygrant impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT donnellymartinj impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity
AT staedkesarahg impactofseasonalityandmalariacontrolinterventionsonanophelesdensityandspeciescompositionfromthreeareasofugandawithdifferingmalariaendemicity