Cargando…
Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19
BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic guidance statements for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) suggest a universal thromboprophylactic strategy with potential to escalate doses in high‐risk patients. To date, no clear approach exists to discriminate patients at high risk for venou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12486 |
_version_ | 1783661626071711744 |
---|---|
author | Spyropoulos, Alex C. Cohen, Stuart L. Gianos, Eugenia Kohn, Nina Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Goldin, Mark Lesser, Marty Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. McGinn, Thomas Barish, Matthew A. |
author_facet | Spyropoulos, Alex C. Cohen, Stuart L. Gianos, Eugenia Kohn, Nina Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Goldin, Mark Lesser, Marty Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. McGinn, Thomas Barish, Matthew A. |
author_sort | Spyropoulos, Alex C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic guidance statements for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) suggest a universal thromboprophylactic strategy with potential to escalate doses in high‐risk patients. To date, no clear approach exists to discriminate patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to externally validate the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model (RAM) for VTE in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 within a multihospital health system. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the IMPROVE‐DD RAM on adult inpatients with COVID‐19 hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and April 27, 2020. Diagnosis of VTE was defined by new acute deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism by Radiology Department imaging or point‐of‐care ultrasound. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and area under the curve (AUC) calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using standard methods. RESULTS: A total of 9407 patients were included, with a VTE prevalence of 2.9%. The VTE rate was 0.4% for IMPROVE‐DD score 0‐1 (low risk), 1.3% for score 2‐3 (moderate risk), and 5.3% for score ≥ 4 (high risk). Approximately 45% of the total population scored high VTE risk, while 21% scored low VTE risk. IMPROVE‐DD discrimination of low versus medium/high risk showed sensitivity of 0.971, specificity of 0.218, PPV of 0.036, and NPV of 0.996. ROC AUC was 0.702. CONCLUSIONS: The IMPROVE‐DD VTE RAM demonstrated very good discrimination to identify hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 as low, moderate, and high VTE risk in this large external validation study with potential to individualize thromboprophylactic strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7938615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79386152021-03-16 Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 Spyropoulos, Alex C. Cohen, Stuart L. Gianos, Eugenia Kohn, Nina Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Goldin, Mark Lesser, Marty Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. McGinn, Thomas Barish, Matthew A. Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic guidance statements for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) suggest a universal thromboprophylactic strategy with potential to escalate doses in high‐risk patients. To date, no clear approach exists to discriminate patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to externally validate the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model (RAM) for VTE in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 within a multihospital health system. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the IMPROVE‐DD RAM on adult inpatients with COVID‐19 hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and April 27, 2020. Diagnosis of VTE was defined by new acute deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism by Radiology Department imaging or point‐of‐care ultrasound. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and area under the curve (AUC) calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using standard methods. RESULTS: A total of 9407 patients were included, with a VTE prevalence of 2.9%. The VTE rate was 0.4% for IMPROVE‐DD score 0‐1 (low risk), 1.3% for score 2‐3 (moderate risk), and 5.3% for score ≥ 4 (high risk). Approximately 45% of the total population scored high VTE risk, while 21% scored low VTE risk. IMPROVE‐DD discrimination of low versus medium/high risk showed sensitivity of 0.971, specificity of 0.218, PPV of 0.036, and NPV of 0.996. ROC AUC was 0.702. CONCLUSIONS: The IMPROVE‐DD VTE RAM demonstrated very good discrimination to identify hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 as low, moderate, and high VTE risk in this large external validation study with potential to individualize thromboprophylactic strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7938615/ /pubmed/33733028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12486 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis Spyropoulos, Alex C. Cohen, Stuart L. Gianos, Eugenia Kohn, Nina Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Goldin, Mark Lesser, Marty Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. McGinn, Thomas Barish, Matthew A. Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 |
title | Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 |
title_full | Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 |
title_fullStr | Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 |
title_short | Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 |
title_sort | validation of the improve‐dd risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with covid‐19 |
topic | Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12486 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spyropoulosalexc validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT cohenstuartl validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT gianoseugenia validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT kohnnina validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT giannisdimitrios validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT chatterjeesaurav validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT goldinmark validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT lessermarty validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT coppakevin validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT hirschjamies validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT mcginnthomas validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT barishmatthewa validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 AT validationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonghospitalizedpatientswithcovid19 |