Cargando…
Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC)
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is a priority for national regulatory bodies in health and care in the UK. However, many health and care staff do not know where to go for support in gaining the required skills and knowledge in QI. This paper reviews Improvement Fundamentals, a massive open onli...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000781 |
_version_ | 1783661677434109952 |
---|---|
author | Guest, Cheryl Wainwright, Philip Herbert, Margaret Smith, Iain Murray |
author_facet | Guest, Cheryl Wainwright, Philip Herbert, Margaret Smith, Iain Murray |
author_sort | Guest, Cheryl |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is a priority for national regulatory bodies in health and care in the UK. However, many health and care staff do not know where to go for support in gaining the required skills and knowledge in QI. This paper reviews Improvement Fundamentals, a massive open online course (MOOC), designed to address this gap, run by an improvement team in the national regulatory body. METHODS: In 2015, National Health Service (NHS) Improving Quality (subsequently the sustainable improvement team in NHS England) established Improvement Fundamentals: a programme of online, self-directed courses in QI for those involved in heath or social care. The programme ran in two cycles: twice in 2015, followed by a re-launch in 2018 (this programme also ran into 2019). A mixed-methods evaluation was carried out of the 2015 programme involving surveys, interviews and social listening. The 2018–2019 programme was evaluated using post-course surveys of participants and activity data from the platform. OUTCOMES: Since the start of the 2015 programme, 604 improvement projects have been developed, run and submitted for formal assessment, with some demonstrating clear improvements in services. Themes from participant feedback on both programmes have included improved understanding of QI tools and methods; greater energy for QI; a greater sense of community and connectedness in participants’ work and increased confidence in using QI tools and techniques. DISCUSSION: Both programmes delivered benefits for participants, and the team’s investment in improvement skills on these programmes has helped to increase capability for future change endeavours. The collaborative nature of the programmes has been key to their successes. CONCLUSION: Improvement Fundamentals demonstrates that MOOCs can be instrumental in driving forward improvements in health and care. The programmes may have utility as a model for future MOOCs, both in QI and other topics, to help drive further improvements in health and care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7938998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79389982021-03-21 Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC) Guest, Cheryl Wainwright, Philip Herbert, Margaret Smith, Iain Murray BMJ Open Qual Quality Education Report BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is a priority for national regulatory bodies in health and care in the UK. However, many health and care staff do not know where to go for support in gaining the required skills and knowledge in QI. This paper reviews Improvement Fundamentals, a massive open online course (MOOC), designed to address this gap, run by an improvement team in the national regulatory body. METHODS: In 2015, National Health Service (NHS) Improving Quality (subsequently the sustainable improvement team in NHS England) established Improvement Fundamentals: a programme of online, self-directed courses in QI for those involved in heath or social care. The programme ran in two cycles: twice in 2015, followed by a re-launch in 2018 (this programme also ran into 2019). A mixed-methods evaluation was carried out of the 2015 programme involving surveys, interviews and social listening. The 2018–2019 programme was evaluated using post-course surveys of participants and activity data from the platform. OUTCOMES: Since the start of the 2015 programme, 604 improvement projects have been developed, run and submitted for formal assessment, with some demonstrating clear improvements in services. Themes from participant feedback on both programmes have included improved understanding of QI tools and methods; greater energy for QI; a greater sense of community and connectedness in participants’ work and increased confidence in using QI tools and techniques. DISCUSSION: Both programmes delivered benefits for participants, and the team’s investment in improvement skills on these programmes has helped to increase capability for future change endeavours. The collaborative nature of the programmes has been key to their successes. CONCLUSION: Improvement Fundamentals demonstrates that MOOCs can be instrumental in driving forward improvements in health and care. The programmes may have utility as a model for future MOOCs, both in QI and other topics, to help drive further improvements in health and care. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7938998/ /pubmed/33674343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000781 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Education Report Guest, Cheryl Wainwright, Philip Herbert, Margaret Smith, Iain Murray Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title | Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_full | Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_fullStr | Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_full_unstemmed | Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_short | Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_sort | driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (mooc) |
topic | Quality Education Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guestcheryl drivingqualityimprovementwithamassiveopenonlinecoursemooc AT wainwrightphilip drivingqualityimprovementwithamassiveopenonlinecoursemooc AT herbertmargaret drivingqualityimprovementwithamassiveopenonlinecoursemooc AT smithiainmurray drivingqualityimprovementwithamassiveopenonlinecoursemooc |