Cargando…

Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists

BACKGROUND: One way to provide performance feedback to hospitalists is through the use of dashboards, which deliver data based on agreed-upon standards. Despite the growing trend on feedback performance on quality metrics, there remain limited data on the means, frequency and content of feedback tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Brittany, Nagavally, Sneha, Wagner, Nicholas, Walker, Rebekah, Segon, Yogita, Segon, Ankur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141
_version_ 1783661677655359488
author Becker, Brittany
Nagavally, Sneha
Wagner, Nicholas
Walker, Rebekah
Segon, Yogita
Segon, Ankur
author_facet Becker, Brittany
Nagavally, Sneha
Wagner, Nicholas
Walker, Rebekah
Segon, Yogita
Segon, Ankur
author_sort Becker, Brittany
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One way to provide performance feedback to hospitalists is through the use of dashboards, which deliver data based on agreed-upon standards. Despite the growing trend on feedback performance on quality metrics, there remain limited data on the means, frequency and content of feedback that should be provided to frontline hospitalists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our research is to report our experience with a comprehensive feedback system for frontline hospitalists, as well as report the change in our quality metrics after implementation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement project was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre among our hospitalist group consisting of 46 full-time faculty members. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: A monthly performance feedback report was distributed to provide ongoing feedback to our hospitalist faculty, including an individual dashboard and a peer comparison report, complemented by coaching to incorporate process improvement tactics into providers’ daily workflow. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome of our study is the change in quality metrics after implementation of the monthly performance feedback report RESULTS: The dashboard and rank order list were sent to all faculty members every month. An improvement was seen in the following quality metrics: length of stay index, 30-day readmission rate, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, provider component of Healthcare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores, attendance at care coordination rounds and percentage of discharge orders placed by 10:00. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a monthly performance feedback report for hospitalists, complemented by peer comparison and guidance on tactics to achieve these metrics, created a culture of quality and improvement in the quality of care delivered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7938999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79389992021-03-21 Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists Becker, Brittany Nagavally, Sneha Wagner, Nicholas Walker, Rebekah Segon, Yogita Segon, Ankur BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: One way to provide performance feedback to hospitalists is through the use of dashboards, which deliver data based on agreed-upon standards. Despite the growing trend on feedback performance on quality metrics, there remain limited data on the means, frequency and content of feedback that should be provided to frontline hospitalists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our research is to report our experience with a comprehensive feedback system for frontline hospitalists, as well as report the change in our quality metrics after implementation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement project was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre among our hospitalist group consisting of 46 full-time faculty members. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: A monthly performance feedback report was distributed to provide ongoing feedback to our hospitalist faculty, including an individual dashboard and a peer comparison report, complemented by coaching to incorporate process improvement tactics into providers’ daily workflow. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome of our study is the change in quality metrics after implementation of the monthly performance feedback report RESULTS: The dashboard and rank order list were sent to all faculty members every month. An improvement was seen in the following quality metrics: length of stay index, 30-day readmission rate, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, provider component of Healthcare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores, attendance at care coordination rounds and percentage of discharge orders placed by 10:00. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a monthly performance feedback report for hospitalists, complemented by peer comparison and guidance on tactics to achieve these metrics, created a culture of quality and improvement in the quality of care delivered. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7938999/ /pubmed/33674345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Becker, Brittany
Nagavally, Sneha
Wagner, Nicholas
Walker, Rebekah
Segon, Yogita
Segon, Ankur
Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
title Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
title_full Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
title_fullStr Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
title_full_unstemmed Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
title_short Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
title_sort creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerbrittany creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists
AT nagavallysneha creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists
AT wagnernicholas creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists
AT walkerrebekah creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists
AT segonyogita creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists
AT segonankur creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists