Cargando…
Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists
BACKGROUND: One way to provide performance feedback to hospitalists is through the use of dashboards, which deliver data based on agreed-upon standards. Despite the growing trend on feedback performance on quality metrics, there remain limited data on the means, frequency and content of feedback tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141 |
_version_ | 1783661677655359488 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Brittany Nagavally, Sneha Wagner, Nicholas Walker, Rebekah Segon, Yogita Segon, Ankur |
author_facet | Becker, Brittany Nagavally, Sneha Wagner, Nicholas Walker, Rebekah Segon, Yogita Segon, Ankur |
author_sort | Becker, Brittany |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One way to provide performance feedback to hospitalists is through the use of dashboards, which deliver data based on agreed-upon standards. Despite the growing trend on feedback performance on quality metrics, there remain limited data on the means, frequency and content of feedback that should be provided to frontline hospitalists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our research is to report our experience with a comprehensive feedback system for frontline hospitalists, as well as report the change in our quality metrics after implementation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement project was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre among our hospitalist group consisting of 46 full-time faculty members. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: A monthly performance feedback report was distributed to provide ongoing feedback to our hospitalist faculty, including an individual dashboard and a peer comparison report, complemented by coaching to incorporate process improvement tactics into providers’ daily workflow. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome of our study is the change in quality metrics after implementation of the monthly performance feedback report RESULTS: The dashboard and rank order list were sent to all faculty members every month. An improvement was seen in the following quality metrics: length of stay index, 30-day readmission rate, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, provider component of Healthcare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores, attendance at care coordination rounds and percentage of discharge orders placed by 10:00. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a monthly performance feedback report for hospitalists, complemented by peer comparison and guidance on tactics to achieve these metrics, created a culture of quality and improvement in the quality of care delivered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7938999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79389992021-03-21 Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists Becker, Brittany Nagavally, Sneha Wagner, Nicholas Walker, Rebekah Segon, Yogita Segon, Ankur BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: One way to provide performance feedback to hospitalists is through the use of dashboards, which deliver data based on agreed-upon standards. Despite the growing trend on feedback performance on quality metrics, there remain limited data on the means, frequency and content of feedback that should be provided to frontline hospitalists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our research is to report our experience with a comprehensive feedback system for frontline hospitalists, as well as report the change in our quality metrics after implementation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement project was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre among our hospitalist group consisting of 46 full-time faculty members. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: A monthly performance feedback report was distributed to provide ongoing feedback to our hospitalist faculty, including an individual dashboard and a peer comparison report, complemented by coaching to incorporate process improvement tactics into providers’ daily workflow. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome of our study is the change in quality metrics after implementation of the monthly performance feedback report RESULTS: The dashboard and rank order list were sent to all faculty members every month. An improvement was seen in the following quality metrics: length of stay index, 30-day readmission rate, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, provider component of Healthcare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores, attendance at care coordination rounds and percentage of discharge orders placed by 10:00. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a monthly performance feedback report for hospitalists, complemented by peer comparison and guidance on tactics to achieve these metrics, created a culture of quality and improvement in the quality of care delivered. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7938999/ /pubmed/33674345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Becker, Brittany Nagavally, Sneha Wagner, Nicholas Walker, Rebekah Segon, Yogita Segon, Ankur Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists |
title | Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists |
title_full | Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists |
title_fullStr | Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists |
title_full_unstemmed | Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists |
title_short | Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists |
title_sort | creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckerbrittany creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists AT nagavallysneha creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists AT wagnernicholas creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists AT walkerrebekah creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists AT segonyogita creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists AT segonankur creatingacultureofqualityourexperiencewithprovidingfeedbacktofrontlinehospitalists |