Cargando…

Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria

BACKGROUND: Reliable information which can only be derived from accurate data is crucial to the success of the health system. Since encoded data on diagnoses and procedures are put to a broad range of uses, the accuracy of coding is imperative. Accuracy of coding with the International Classificatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olagundoye, Olawunmi, van Boven, Kees, Daramola, Olufunmilola, Njoku, Kendra, Omosun, Adenike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7939013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000938
_version_ 1783661679556427776
author Olagundoye, Olawunmi
van Boven, Kees
Daramola, Olufunmilola
Njoku, Kendra
Omosun, Adenike
author_facet Olagundoye, Olawunmi
van Boven, Kees
Daramola, Olufunmilola
Njoku, Kendra
Omosun, Adenike
author_sort Olagundoye, Olawunmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reliable information which can only be derived from accurate data is crucial to the success of the health system. Since encoded data on diagnoses and procedures are put to a broad range of uses, the accuracy of coding is imperative. Accuracy of coding with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) is impeded by a manual coding process that is dependent on the medical records officers’ level of experience/knowledge of medical terminologies. AIM STATEMENT: To improve the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data at the general hospitals in Lagos State from 78.7% to ≥95% between March 2018 and September 2018. METHODS: A quality improvement (QI) design using the Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle framework. The interventions comprised the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology software and training of 52 clinical coders from the 26 general hospitals. An end-of-training coding exercise compared the coding accuracy between the old method and the intervention. The outcome was continuously monitored and evaluated in a phased approach. RESULTS: Research conducted in the study setting yielded a baseline coding accuracy of 78.7%. The use of the difficult items (wrongly coded items) from the research for the end-of-training coding exercise accounted for a lower coding accuracy when compared with baseline. The difference in coding accuracy between manual coders (47.8%) and browser-assisted coders (54.9%) from the coding exercise was statistically significant. Overall average percentage coding accuracy at the hospitals over the 12-month monitoring and evaluation period was 91.3%. CONCLUSION: This QI initiative introduced a stop-gap for improving data coding accuracy in the absence of automated coding and electronic health record. It provides evidence that the electronic diagnostic terminology tool does improve coding accuracy and with continuous use/practice should improve reliability and coding efficiency in resource-constrained settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7939013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79390132021-03-28 Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria Olagundoye, Olawunmi van Boven, Kees Daramola, Olufunmilola Njoku, Kendra Omosun, Adenike BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: Reliable information which can only be derived from accurate data is crucial to the success of the health system. Since encoded data on diagnoses and procedures are put to a broad range of uses, the accuracy of coding is imperative. Accuracy of coding with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) is impeded by a manual coding process that is dependent on the medical records officers’ level of experience/knowledge of medical terminologies. AIM STATEMENT: To improve the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data at the general hospitals in Lagos State from 78.7% to ≥95% between March 2018 and September 2018. METHODS: A quality improvement (QI) design using the Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle framework. The interventions comprised the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology software and training of 52 clinical coders from the 26 general hospitals. An end-of-training coding exercise compared the coding accuracy between the old method and the intervention. The outcome was continuously monitored and evaluated in a phased approach. RESULTS: Research conducted in the study setting yielded a baseline coding accuracy of 78.7%. The use of the difficult items (wrongly coded items) from the research for the end-of-training coding exercise accounted for a lower coding accuracy when compared with baseline. The difference in coding accuracy between manual coders (47.8%) and browser-assisted coders (54.9%) from the coding exercise was statistically significant. Overall average percentage coding accuracy at the hospitals over the 12-month monitoring and evaluation period was 91.3%. CONCLUSION: This QI initiative introduced a stop-gap for improving data coding accuracy in the absence of automated coding and electronic health record. It provides evidence that the electronic diagnostic terminology tool does improve coding accuracy and with continuous use/practice should improve reliability and coding efficiency in resource-constrained settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7939013/ /pubmed/33674344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000938 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Olagundoye, Olawunmi
van Boven, Kees
Daramola, Olufunmilola
Njoku, Kendra
Omosun, Adenike
Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria
title Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria
title_full Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria
title_fullStr Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria
title_short Improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria
title_sort improving the accuracy of icd-10 coding of morbidity/mortality data through the introduction of an electronic diagnostic terminology tool at the general hospitals in lagos, nigeria
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7939013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000938
work_keys_str_mv AT olagundoyeolawunmi improvingtheaccuracyoficd10codingofmorbiditymortalitydatathroughtheintroductionofanelectronicdiagnosticterminologytoolatthegeneralhospitalsinlagosnigeria
AT vanbovenkees improvingtheaccuracyoficd10codingofmorbiditymortalitydatathroughtheintroductionofanelectronicdiagnosticterminologytoolatthegeneralhospitalsinlagosnigeria
AT daramolaolufunmilola improvingtheaccuracyoficd10codingofmorbiditymortalitydatathroughtheintroductionofanelectronicdiagnosticterminologytoolatthegeneralhospitalsinlagosnigeria
AT njokukendra improvingtheaccuracyoficd10codingofmorbiditymortalitydatathroughtheintroductionofanelectronicdiagnosticterminologytoolatthegeneralhospitalsinlagosnigeria
AT omosunadenike improvingtheaccuracyoficd10codingofmorbiditymortalitydatathroughtheintroductionofanelectronicdiagnosticterminologytoolatthegeneralhospitalsinlagosnigeria