Cargando…

The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance

PURPOSE: To compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, open-lab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hovanesian, John A, Jones, Michael, Allen, Quentin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7939508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285628
_version_ 1783661764591747072
author Hovanesian, John A
Jones, Michael
Allen, Quentin
author_facet Hovanesian, John A
Jones, Michael
Allen, Quentin
author_sort Hovanesian, John A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, open-label, multicenter analysis of PROs, spectacle independence, and satisfaction among patients undergoing cataract surgery who had been implanted at least 1 month previously with AcrySof IQ PanOptix or PanOptix Toric trifocal (n = 59) IOLs bilaterally. Results were compared to outcomes from a similar study with the AcrySof ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 or the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 mini-monovision lens [n = 191]). RESULTS: Spectacle independence was significantly higher in the PanOptix cohort, with 83% of patients “never” needing glasses for any activity versus 36% in the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision and 34% in the ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 cohorts. No significant differences in patient satisfaction rates were reported between the three cohorts. Glare and halo were rated “extremely” noticeable more with the PanOptix (10%) than with the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision (1%) or ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 (3%). BCVA differences were not statistically significant, and no new safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSION: The AcrySof PanOptix trifocal provides significantly greater spectacle independence across all measured activities than the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal IOLs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7939508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79395082021-03-09 The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance Hovanesian, John A Jones, Michael Allen, Quentin Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, open-label, multicenter analysis of PROs, spectacle independence, and satisfaction among patients undergoing cataract surgery who had been implanted at least 1 month previously with AcrySof IQ PanOptix or PanOptix Toric trifocal (n = 59) IOLs bilaterally. Results were compared to outcomes from a similar study with the AcrySof ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 or the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 mini-monovision lens [n = 191]). RESULTS: Spectacle independence was significantly higher in the PanOptix cohort, with 83% of patients “never” needing glasses for any activity versus 36% in the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision and 34% in the ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 cohorts. No significant differences in patient satisfaction rates were reported between the three cohorts. Glare and halo were rated “extremely” noticeable more with the PanOptix (10%) than with the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision (1%) or ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 (3%). BCVA differences were not statistically significant, and no new safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSION: The AcrySof PanOptix trifocal provides significantly greater spectacle independence across all measured activities than the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal IOLs. Dove 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7939508/ /pubmed/33692612 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285628 Text en © 2021 Hovanesian et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hovanesian, John A
Jones, Michael
Allen, Quentin
The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_full The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_fullStr The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_full_unstemmed The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_short The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_sort panoptix trifocal iol vs the restor 2.5 active focus and restor 3.0-add multifocal lenses: a study of patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and uncorrected visual performance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7939508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285628
work_keys_str_mv AT hovanesianjohna thepanoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance
AT jonesmichael thepanoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance
AT allenquentin thepanoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance
AT hovanesianjohna panoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance
AT jonesmichael panoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance
AT allenquentin panoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance