Cargando…
The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
PURPOSE: To compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, open-lab...
Autores principales: | Hovanesian, John A, Jones, Michael, Allen, Quentin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7939508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692612 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285628 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Vivity Extended Range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Spectacle Independence
por: Hovanesian, John A, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Minus Piggyback Lens Overlaying ReSTOR(®) Multifocal Lens in High Myopia
por: Gupta, Isha, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Optical bench performance of AcrySof(®) IQ ReSTOR(®), AT LISA(®) tri, and FineVision(®) intraocular lenses
por: Carson, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Visual performance of Acrysof ReSTOR compared with a monofocal intraocular lens following implantation in cataract surgery
por: JI, JING, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Modelling lifetime cost consequences of ReSTOR(® )in cataract surgery in four European countries
por: Lafuma, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2008)