Cargando…
Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria
As malaria remains a major health problem worldwide, various diagnostic tests have been developed, including microscopy-based and rapid diagnostic tests. LabChip real-time PCR (LRP) is a small and portable device used to diagnose malaria using lab-on-a-chip technology. This study aimed to evaluate t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7939964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33684990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2021.59.1.77 |
_version_ | 1783661850115702784 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jeeyong Lim, Da Hye Mihn, Do-CiC Nam, Jeonghun Jang, Woong Sik Lim, Chae Seung |
author_facet | Kim, Jeeyong Lim, Da Hye Mihn, Do-CiC Nam, Jeonghun Jang, Woong Sik Lim, Chae Seung |
author_sort | Kim, Jeeyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | As malaria remains a major health problem worldwide, various diagnostic tests have been developed, including microscopy-based and rapid diagnostic tests. LabChip real-time PCR (LRP) is a small and portable device used to diagnose malaria using lab-on-a-chip technology. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LRP for detecting malaria parasites. Two hundred thirteen patients and 150 healthy individuals were enrolled from May 2009 to October 2015. A diagnostic detectability of LRP for malaria parasites was compared to that of conventional RT-PCR. Sensitivity of LRP for Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale was 95.5%, 96.0%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity of LRP for P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale was 100%, 99.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Cohen’s Kappa coefficients between LRP and CFX96 for detecting P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale were 0.96, 0.98, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively. Significant difference was not observed between the results of LRP and conventional RT-PCR and microscopic examination. A time required to amplify DNAs using LRP and conventional RT-PCR was 27 min and 86 min, respectively. LRP amplified DNAs 2 times more fast than conventional RT-PCR due to the faster heat transfer. Therefore, LRP could be employed as a useful tool for detecting malaria parasites in clinical laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7939964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79399642021-03-16 Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria Kim, Jeeyong Lim, Da Hye Mihn, Do-CiC Nam, Jeonghun Jang, Woong Sik Lim, Chae Seung Korean J Parasitol Brief Communication As malaria remains a major health problem worldwide, various diagnostic tests have been developed, including microscopy-based and rapid diagnostic tests. LabChip real-time PCR (LRP) is a small and portable device used to diagnose malaria using lab-on-a-chip technology. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LRP for detecting malaria parasites. Two hundred thirteen patients and 150 healthy individuals were enrolled from May 2009 to October 2015. A diagnostic detectability of LRP for malaria parasites was compared to that of conventional RT-PCR. Sensitivity of LRP for Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale was 95.5%, 96.0%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity of LRP for P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale was 100%, 99.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Cohen’s Kappa coefficients between LRP and CFX96 for detecting P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale were 0.96, 0.98, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively. Significant difference was not observed between the results of LRP and conventional RT-PCR and microscopic examination. A time required to amplify DNAs using LRP and conventional RT-PCR was 27 min and 86 min, respectively. LRP amplified DNAs 2 times more fast than conventional RT-PCR due to the faster heat transfer. Therefore, LRP could be employed as a useful tool for detecting malaria parasites in clinical laboratories. The Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine 2021-02 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7939964/ /pubmed/33684990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2021.59.1.77 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Kim, Jeeyong Lim, Da Hye Mihn, Do-CiC Nam, Jeonghun Jang, Woong Sik Lim, Chae Seung Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria |
title | Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria |
title_full | Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria |
title_fullStr | Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria |
title_short | Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-Time PCR Using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria |
title_sort | clinical usefulness of labchip real-time pcr using lab-on-a-chip technology for diagnosing malaria |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7939964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33684990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2021.59.1.77 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjeeyong clinicalusefulnessoflabchiprealtimepcrusinglabonachiptechnologyfordiagnosingmalaria AT limdahye clinicalusefulnessoflabchiprealtimepcrusinglabonachiptechnologyfordiagnosingmalaria AT mihndocic clinicalusefulnessoflabchiprealtimepcrusinglabonachiptechnologyfordiagnosingmalaria AT namjeonghun clinicalusefulnessoflabchiprealtimepcrusinglabonachiptechnologyfordiagnosingmalaria AT jangwoongsik clinicalusefulnessoflabchiprealtimepcrusinglabonachiptechnologyfordiagnosingmalaria AT limchaeseung clinicalusefulnessoflabchiprealtimepcrusinglabonachiptechnologyfordiagnosingmalaria |