Cargando…
A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India
BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) are approved for multiple indications in solid tumors. However access to these therapies is limited in low and middle income countries. Hence we performed an audit to identify accessibility, adverse event rates, compliance, progression...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3617 |
_version_ | 1783661903637118976 |
---|---|
author | Noronha, Vanita Abraham, George Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Menon, Nandini Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Jain, Srushti Talreja, Vikas T Kapoor, Akhil Kumar Singh, Gunjesh Khaddar, Satvik Gupta, Kushal Rathinasamy, Narmadha Srinivas, Sujay Agrawal, Amit Ventrapati, Pradeep Prabhash, Kumar |
author_facet | Noronha, Vanita Abraham, George Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Menon, Nandini Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Jain, Srushti Talreja, Vikas T Kapoor, Akhil Kumar Singh, Gunjesh Khaddar, Satvik Gupta, Kushal Rathinasamy, Narmadha Srinivas, Sujay Agrawal, Amit Ventrapati, Pradeep Prabhash, Kumar |
author_sort | Noronha, Vanita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) are approved for multiple indications in solid tumors. However access to these therapies is limited in low and middle income countries. Hence we performed an audit to identify accessibility, adverse event rates, compliance, progression free survival and overall survival in solid tumors. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective analysis of prospective data base of patients with non‐melanoma solid tumors who were treated with immunotherapy from August 2015 to November 2018. Adverse events during immunotherapy were documented and graded using CTCAE (Common terminology criteria for adverse events), v. 4.02. The response rates to immunotherapy, toxicities and the time to onset and resolution of toxicities were also evaluated as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Out of 9610 patients, only 155 patients (1.61%) could receive immunotherapy. The most common malignancies included metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, metastatic urothelial carcinoma and relapsed/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Median overall survival in patients who received immunotherapy in non‐melanoma solid malignancies was 5.37 months (95% CI, 3.73–9.73). Poor performance status at baseline was the only adverse prognostic factor. The median progression free survival was 2.57 months (95% CI, 1.73–3.83). Immunotherapy was well tolerated with most common side effects being fatigue 14.8% and anorexia 5.8%. The cumulative incidence of immune related adverse events like hepatitis, pneumonitis, colitis and nephritis was less than 10%. CONCLUSION: Real‐world data in Indian setting confirms the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non‐melanoma solid tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7940210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79402102021-03-16 A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India Noronha, Vanita Abraham, George Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Menon, Nandini Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Jain, Srushti Talreja, Vikas T Kapoor, Akhil Kumar Singh, Gunjesh Khaddar, Satvik Gupta, Kushal Rathinasamy, Narmadha Srinivas, Sujay Agrawal, Amit Ventrapati, Pradeep Prabhash, Kumar Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) are approved for multiple indications in solid tumors. However access to these therapies is limited in low and middle income countries. Hence we performed an audit to identify accessibility, adverse event rates, compliance, progression free survival and overall survival in solid tumors. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective analysis of prospective data base of patients with non‐melanoma solid tumors who were treated with immunotherapy from August 2015 to November 2018. Adverse events during immunotherapy were documented and graded using CTCAE (Common terminology criteria for adverse events), v. 4.02. The response rates to immunotherapy, toxicities and the time to onset and resolution of toxicities were also evaluated as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Out of 9610 patients, only 155 patients (1.61%) could receive immunotherapy. The most common malignancies included metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, metastatic urothelial carcinoma and relapsed/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Median overall survival in patients who received immunotherapy in non‐melanoma solid malignancies was 5.37 months (95% CI, 3.73–9.73). Poor performance status at baseline was the only adverse prognostic factor. The median progression free survival was 2.57 months (95% CI, 1.73–3.83). Immunotherapy was well tolerated with most common side effects being fatigue 14.8% and anorexia 5.8%. The cumulative incidence of immune related adverse events like hepatitis, pneumonitis, colitis and nephritis was less than 10%. CONCLUSION: Real‐world data in Indian setting confirms the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non‐melanoma solid tumors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7940210/ /pubmed/33591635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3617 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Noronha, Vanita Abraham, George Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Menon, Nandini Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Jain, Srushti Talreja, Vikas T Kapoor, Akhil Kumar Singh, Gunjesh Khaddar, Satvik Gupta, Kushal Rathinasamy, Narmadha Srinivas, Sujay Agrawal, Amit Ventrapati, Pradeep Prabhash, Kumar A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India |
title | A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India |
title_full | A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India |
title_fullStr | A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India |
title_full_unstemmed | A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India |
title_short | A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India |
title_sort | real‐world data of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from india |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3617 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noronhavanita arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT abrahamgeorge arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT patilvijay arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT joshiamit arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT menonnandini arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT mahajanabhishek arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT januamit arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT jainsrushti arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT talrejavikast arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT kapoorakhil arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT kumarsinghgunjesh arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT khaddarsatvik arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT guptakushal arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT rathinasamynarmadha arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT srinivassujay arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT agrawalamit arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT ventrapatipradeep arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT prabhashkumar arealworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT noronhavanita realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT abrahamgeorge realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT patilvijay realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT joshiamit realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT menonnandini realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT mahajanabhishek realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT januamit realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT jainsrushti realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT talrejavikast realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT kapoorakhil realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT kumarsinghgunjesh realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT khaddarsatvik realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT guptakushal realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT rathinasamynarmadha realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT srinivassujay realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT agrawalamit realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT ventrapatipradeep realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia AT prabhashkumar realworlddataofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsfromindia |