Cargando…

The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs using fecal immunochemical test (FIT) have to choose a cut‐off value to decide which citizens to recall for colonoscopy. The evidence on the optimal cut‐off value is sparse and based on studies with a low number of cancer cases. METHODS: This ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Njor, Sisse Helle, Andersen, Berit, Friis‐Hansen, Lennart, de Haas, Niels, Linnemann, Dorte, Nørgaard, Henrik, Roikjær, Ole, Søndergaard, Bo, Rasmussen, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33534955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3761
_version_ 1783661904568254464
author Njor, Sisse Helle
Andersen, Berit
Friis‐Hansen, Lennart
de Haas, Niels
Linnemann, Dorte
Nørgaard, Henrik
Roikjær, Ole
Søndergaard, Bo
Rasmussen, Morten
author_facet Njor, Sisse Helle
Andersen, Berit
Friis‐Hansen, Lennart
de Haas, Niels
Linnemann, Dorte
Nørgaard, Henrik
Roikjær, Ole
Søndergaard, Bo
Rasmussen, Morten
author_sort Njor, Sisse Helle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs using fecal immunochemical test (FIT) have to choose a cut‐off value to decide which citizens to recall for colonoscopy. The evidence on the optimal cut‐off value is sparse and based on studies with a low number of cancer cases. METHODS: This observational study used data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for various cut‐off values based on a large number of cancers. Traditionally optimal cut‐off values are found by weighting sensitivity and specificity equally. As this might result in too many unnecessary colonoscopies we also provide optimal cut‐off values for different weighting of sensitivity and specificity/number of needed colonoscopies to detect one cancer. RESULTS: Weighting sensitivity and specificity equally gives an optimal cut‐off value of 45 ng Hb/ml. This, however, means making 24 colonoscopies to detect one cancer. Weighting sensitivity lower and for example, aiming at making about 16 colonoscopies to detect one cancer, gives an optimal cut‐off value of 125 ng Hb/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal cut‐off value in an FIT population‐based screening program is 45 ng Hb/ml, when as traditionally sensitivity and specificity are weighted equally. If, however, 24 colonoscopies needed to detect one cancer is too huge a burden on the health care system and the participants, 80, 125, 175, and 350 ng Hb/ml are optimal cut‐off values when only 19/16/14/10 colonoscopies are accepted to find one cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7940214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79402142021-03-16 The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study Njor, Sisse Helle Andersen, Berit Friis‐Hansen, Lennart de Haas, Niels Linnemann, Dorte Nørgaard, Henrik Roikjær, Ole Søndergaard, Bo Rasmussen, Morten Cancer Med Cancer Pervention BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs using fecal immunochemical test (FIT) have to choose a cut‐off value to decide which citizens to recall for colonoscopy. The evidence on the optimal cut‐off value is sparse and based on studies with a low number of cancer cases. METHODS: This observational study used data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for various cut‐off values based on a large number of cancers. Traditionally optimal cut‐off values are found by weighting sensitivity and specificity equally. As this might result in too many unnecessary colonoscopies we also provide optimal cut‐off values for different weighting of sensitivity and specificity/number of needed colonoscopies to detect one cancer. RESULTS: Weighting sensitivity and specificity equally gives an optimal cut‐off value of 45 ng Hb/ml. This, however, means making 24 colonoscopies to detect one cancer. Weighting sensitivity lower and for example, aiming at making about 16 colonoscopies to detect one cancer, gives an optimal cut‐off value of 125 ng Hb/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal cut‐off value in an FIT population‐based screening program is 45 ng Hb/ml, when as traditionally sensitivity and specificity are weighted equally. If, however, 24 colonoscopies needed to detect one cancer is too huge a burden on the health care system and the participants, 80, 125, 175, and 350 ng Hb/ml are optimal cut‐off values when only 19/16/14/10 colonoscopies are accepted to find one cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7940214/ /pubmed/33534955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3761 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Pervention
Njor, Sisse Helle
Andersen, Berit
Friis‐Hansen, Lennart
de Haas, Niels
Linnemann, Dorte
Nørgaard, Henrik
Roikjær, Ole
Søndergaard, Bo
Rasmussen, Morten
The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study
title The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study
title_full The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study
title_fullStr The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study
title_full_unstemmed The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study
title_short The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study
title_sort optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: an observational study
topic Cancer Pervention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33534955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3761
work_keys_str_mv AT njorsissehelle theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT andersenberit theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT friishansenlennart theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT dehaasniels theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT linnemanndorte theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT nørgaardhenrik theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT roikjærole theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT søndergaardbo theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT rasmussenmorten theoptimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT njorsissehelle optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT andersenberit optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT friishansenlennart optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT dehaasniels optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT linnemanndorte optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT nørgaardhenrik optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT roikjærole optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT søndergaardbo optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy
AT rasmussenmorten optimalcutoffvalueinfitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeninganobservationalstudy