Cargando…
Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands
BACKGROUND: The role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) has increased in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Dutch national guidelines have recommended the use of FDG-PET/CT and SL for patients with loca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09096-z |
_version_ | 1783661930368466944 |
---|---|
author | Gertsen, Emma C. Borggreve, Alicia S. Brenkman, Hylke J. F. Verhoeven, Rob H. A. Vegt, Erik van Hillegersberg, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Ruurda, Jelle P. |
author_facet | Gertsen, Emma C. Borggreve, Alicia S. Brenkman, Hylke J. F. Verhoeven, Rob H. A. Vegt, Erik van Hillegersberg, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Ruurda, Jelle P. |
author_sort | Gertsen, Emma C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) has increased in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Dutch national guidelines have recommended the use of FDG-PET/CT and SL for patients with locally advanced tumors since July 2016. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of FDG-PET/CT and SL in The Netherlands. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2018, all patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. The use of FDG-PET/CT and SL was evaluated before and after revision of the Dutch guidelines. Outcomes included the number of non-curative procedures (e.g. palliative and futile procedures) and the association of FDG-PET/CT and SL, with waiting times from diagnosis to the start of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 3310 patients were analyzed. After July 2016, the use of FDG-PET/CT (23% vs. 61%; p < 0.001) and SL (21% vs. 58%; p < 0.001) increased. FDG-PET/CT was associated with additional waiting time to neoadjuvant therapy (4 days), as well as primary surgical treatment (20 days), and SL was associated with 8 additional days of waiting time to neoadjuvant therapy. Performing SL or both modalities consecutively in patients in whom it was indicated was not associated with the number of non-curative procedures. CONCLUSION: During implementation of FDG-PET/CT and SL after revision of the guidelines, both have increasingly been used in The Netherlands. The addition of these staging methods was associated with increased waiting time to treatment. The number of non-curative procedures did not differ after performing none, solely one, or both staging modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7940330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79403302021-03-21 Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands Gertsen, Emma C. Borggreve, Alicia S. Brenkman, Hylke J. F. Verhoeven, Rob H. A. Vegt, Erik van Hillegersberg, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Ruurda, Jelle P. Ann Surg Oncol Gastrointestinal Oncology BACKGROUND: The role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) has increased in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Dutch national guidelines have recommended the use of FDG-PET/CT and SL for patients with locally advanced tumors since July 2016. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of FDG-PET/CT and SL in The Netherlands. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2018, all patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. The use of FDG-PET/CT and SL was evaluated before and after revision of the Dutch guidelines. Outcomes included the number of non-curative procedures (e.g. palliative and futile procedures) and the association of FDG-PET/CT and SL, with waiting times from diagnosis to the start of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 3310 patients were analyzed. After July 2016, the use of FDG-PET/CT (23% vs. 61%; p < 0.001) and SL (21% vs. 58%; p < 0.001) increased. FDG-PET/CT was associated with additional waiting time to neoadjuvant therapy (4 days), as well as primary surgical treatment (20 days), and SL was associated with 8 additional days of waiting time to neoadjuvant therapy. Performing SL or both modalities consecutively in patients in whom it was indicated was not associated with the number of non-curative procedures. CONCLUSION: During implementation of FDG-PET/CT and SL after revision of the guidelines, both have increasingly been used in The Netherlands. The addition of these staging methods was associated with increased waiting time to treatment. The number of non-curative procedures did not differ after performing none, solely one, or both staging modalities. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7940330/ /pubmed/32901312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09096-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Oncology Gertsen, Emma C. Borggreve, Alicia S. Brenkman, Hylke J. F. Verhoeven, Rob H. A. Vegt, Erik van Hillegersberg, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Ruurda, Jelle P. Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands |
title | Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands |
title_full | Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands |
title_short | Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands |
title_sort | evaluation of the implementation of fdg-pet/ct and staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer in the netherlands |
topic | Gastrointestinal Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09096-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gertsenemmac evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT borggrevealicias evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT brenkmanhylkejf evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT verhoevenrobha evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT vegterik evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT vanhillegersbergrichard evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT siersemapeterd evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT ruurdajellep evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands AT evaluationoftheimplementationoffdgpetctandstaginglaparoscopyforgastriccancerinthenetherlands |