Cargando…

Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study

Marital status proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with breast cancer. We therefore strove to explore the impact of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We selected patients meeting the eligibility criteria from the Surveill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Wu, Ruan, Guodong, Lin, Yingli, Zhu, Jianming, Tu, Chuanjian, Li, Zhian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33686220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84996-y
_version_ 1783661961469231104
author Ding, Wu
Ruan, Guodong
Lin, Yingli
Zhu, Jianming
Tu, Chuanjian
Li, Zhian
author_facet Ding, Wu
Ruan, Guodong
Lin, Yingli
Zhu, Jianming
Tu, Chuanjian
Li, Zhian
author_sort Ding, Wu
collection PubMed
description Marital status proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with breast cancer. We therefore strove to explore the impact of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We selected patients meeting the eligibility criteria from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer database. We then used multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model to analyze the effect of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific special survival (BCSS). Compared with the patients in the Single–Single group and the divorced/separated/widowed–divorced/separated/widowed (DSW–DSW) group, patients in the Married–Married group were significantly associated with better BCSS (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03–1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14–1.25, P < 0.001, respectively) and OS (HR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20–1.30, P < 0.001; HR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.45–1.54, P < 0.001, respectively). In contrast to the DSW–DSW group, the Single–Single group and the DSW–Married group showed similar BCSS (HR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92–1.05, P = 0.660; HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97–1.15, P = 0.193, respectively) but better OS (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09–1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.25–1.40, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the Single–Single group, the Single–Married group showed significantly better BCSS (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07–1.36, P = 0.003) but no difference in OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.98–1.18, P = 0.102); In contrast to the Married–DSW group, the Married–Married group exhibited better BCSS (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05–1.18, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22–1.32, P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated that, regardless of their previous marital status, married patients had a better prognosis than unmarried patients. Moreover, single patients obtained better survival outcomes than DSW patients. Therefore, it is necessary to proactively provide single and DSW individuals with appropriate social and psychological support that would benefit them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7940486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79404862021-03-10 Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study Ding, Wu Ruan, Guodong Lin, Yingli Zhu, Jianming Tu, Chuanjian Li, Zhian Sci Rep Article Marital status proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with breast cancer. We therefore strove to explore the impact of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We selected patients meeting the eligibility criteria from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer database. We then used multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model to analyze the effect of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific special survival (BCSS). Compared with the patients in the Single–Single group and the divorced/separated/widowed–divorced/separated/widowed (DSW–DSW) group, patients in the Married–Married group were significantly associated with better BCSS (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03–1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14–1.25, P < 0.001, respectively) and OS (HR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20–1.30, P < 0.001; HR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.45–1.54, P < 0.001, respectively). In contrast to the DSW–DSW group, the Single–Single group and the DSW–Married group showed similar BCSS (HR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92–1.05, P = 0.660; HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97–1.15, P = 0.193, respectively) but better OS (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09–1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.25–1.40, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the Single–Single group, the Single–Married group showed significantly better BCSS (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07–1.36, P = 0.003) but no difference in OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.98–1.18, P = 0.102); In contrast to the Married–DSW group, the Married–Married group exhibited better BCSS (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05–1.18, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22–1.32, P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated that, regardless of their previous marital status, married patients had a better prognosis than unmarried patients. Moreover, single patients obtained better survival outcomes than DSW patients. Therefore, it is necessary to proactively provide single and DSW individuals with appropriate social and psychological support that would benefit them. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7940486/ /pubmed/33686220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84996-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ding, Wu
Ruan, Guodong
Lin, Yingli
Zhu, Jianming
Tu, Chuanjian
Li, Zhian
Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
title Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
title_full Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
title_fullStr Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
title_short Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
title_sort dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33686220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84996-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dingwu dynamicchangesinmaritalstatusandsurvivalinwomenwithbreastcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT ruanguodong dynamicchangesinmaritalstatusandsurvivalinwomenwithbreastcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT linyingli dynamicchangesinmaritalstatusandsurvivalinwomenwithbreastcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT zhujianming dynamicchangesinmaritalstatusandsurvivalinwomenwithbreastcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT tuchuanjian dynamicchangesinmaritalstatusandsurvivalinwomenwithbreastcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT lizhian dynamicchangesinmaritalstatusandsurvivalinwomenwithbreastcancerapopulationbasedstudy