Cargando…
Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association of Orthodontists
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678628 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126 |
_version_ | 1783662020125523968 |
---|---|
author | Noh, Kyoung Jin Baik, Hyoung-Seon Han, Sang-Sun Jang, Woowon Choi, Yoon Jeong |
author_facet | Noh, Kyoung Jin Baik, Hyoung-Seon Han, Sang-Sun Jang, Woowon Choi, Yoon Jeong |
author_sort | Noh, Kyoung Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing no TMJ symptoms. The participants were divided into Class I, II, and III groups on the basis of their sagittal cephalometric relationships and into hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent groups on the basis of their vertical cephalometric relationships. The following measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomography images and compared among the groups condylar volume, condylar size (width, length, and height), fossa size (length and height), and condyle-to-fossa joint spaces at the anterior, superior, and posterior condylar poles. RESULTS: The null hypothesis was rejected. The Class III group showed larger values for condylar width, condylar height, and fossa height than the Class II group (p < 0.05). Condylar volume and superior joint space in the hyperdivergent group were significantly smaller than those in the other two vertical groups (p < 0.001), whereas fossa length and height were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than in the other groups (p < 0.01). The hypodivergent group showed a greater condylar width than the hyperdivergent group (p < 0.01). The sagittal and vertical cephalometric patterns showed statistically significant interactions for fossa length and height. CONCLUSIONS: TMJ morphology differed across diverse skeletal cephalometric patterns. The fossa length and height were affected by the interactions of the vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7940806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Association of Orthodontists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79408062021-03-25 Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study Noh, Kyoung Jin Baik, Hyoung-Seon Han, Sang-Sun Jang, Woowon Choi, Yoon Jeong Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing no TMJ symptoms. The participants were divided into Class I, II, and III groups on the basis of their sagittal cephalometric relationships and into hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent groups on the basis of their vertical cephalometric relationships. The following measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomography images and compared among the groups condylar volume, condylar size (width, length, and height), fossa size (length and height), and condyle-to-fossa joint spaces at the anterior, superior, and posterior condylar poles. RESULTS: The null hypothesis was rejected. The Class III group showed larger values for condylar width, condylar height, and fossa height than the Class II group (p < 0.05). Condylar volume and superior joint space in the hyperdivergent group were significantly smaller than those in the other two vertical groups (p < 0.001), whereas fossa length and height were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than in the other groups (p < 0.01). The hypodivergent group showed a greater condylar width than the hyperdivergent group (p < 0.01). The sagittal and vertical cephalometric patterns showed statistically significant interactions for fossa length and height. CONCLUSIONS: TMJ morphology differed across diverse skeletal cephalometric patterns. The fossa length and height were affected by the interactions of the vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2021-03-25 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7940806/ /pubmed/33678628 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126 Text en © 2021 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Noh, Kyoung Jin Baik, Hyoung-Seon Han, Sang-Sun Jang, Woowon Choi, Yoon Jeong Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title | Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full | Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_fullStr | Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_short | Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_sort | differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678628 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nohkyoungjin differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT baikhyoungseon differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT hansangsun differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT jangwoowon differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT choiyoonjeong differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy |