Cargando…

Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noh, Kyoung Jin, Baik, Hyoung-Seon, Han, Sang-Sun, Jang, Woowon, Choi, Yoon Jeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678628
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126
_version_ 1783662020125523968
author Noh, Kyoung Jin
Baik, Hyoung-Seon
Han, Sang-Sun
Jang, Woowon
Choi, Yoon Jeong
author_facet Noh, Kyoung Jin
Baik, Hyoung-Seon
Han, Sang-Sun
Jang, Woowon
Choi, Yoon Jeong
author_sort Noh, Kyoung Jin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing no TMJ symptoms. The participants were divided into Class I, II, and III groups on the basis of their sagittal cephalometric relationships and into hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent groups on the basis of their vertical cephalometric relationships. The following measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomography images and compared among the groups condylar volume, condylar size (width, length, and height), fossa size (length and height), and condyle-to-fossa joint spaces at the anterior, superior, and posterior condylar poles. RESULTS: The null hypothesis was rejected. The Class III group showed larger values for condylar width, condylar height, and fossa height than the Class II group (p < 0.05). Condylar volume and superior joint space in the hyperdivergent group were significantly smaller than those in the other two vertical groups (p < 0.001), whereas fossa length and height were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than in the other groups (p < 0.01). The hypodivergent group showed a greater condylar width than the hyperdivergent group (p < 0.01). The sagittal and vertical cephalometric patterns showed statistically significant interactions for fossa length and height. CONCLUSIONS: TMJ morphology differed across diverse skeletal cephalometric patterns. The fossa length and height were affected by the interactions of the vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7940806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79408062021-03-25 Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study Noh, Kyoung Jin Baik, Hyoung-Seon Han, Sang-Sun Jang, Woowon Choi, Yoon Jeong Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing no TMJ symptoms. The participants were divided into Class I, II, and III groups on the basis of their sagittal cephalometric relationships and into hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent groups on the basis of their vertical cephalometric relationships. The following measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomography images and compared among the groups condylar volume, condylar size (width, length, and height), fossa size (length and height), and condyle-to-fossa joint spaces at the anterior, superior, and posterior condylar poles. RESULTS: The null hypothesis was rejected. The Class III group showed larger values for condylar width, condylar height, and fossa height than the Class II group (p < 0.05). Condylar volume and superior joint space in the hyperdivergent group were significantly smaller than those in the other two vertical groups (p < 0.001), whereas fossa length and height were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than in the other groups (p < 0.01). The hypodivergent group showed a greater condylar width than the hyperdivergent group (p < 0.01). The sagittal and vertical cephalometric patterns showed statistically significant interactions for fossa length and height. CONCLUSIONS: TMJ morphology differed across diverse skeletal cephalometric patterns. The fossa length and height were affected by the interactions of the vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2021-03-25 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7940806/ /pubmed/33678628 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126 Text en © 2021 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Noh, Kyoung Jin
Baik, Hyoung-Seon
Han, Sang-Sun
Jang, Woowon
Choi, Yoon Jeong
Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_full Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_fullStr Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_short Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_sort differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678628
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126
work_keys_str_mv AT nohkyoungjin differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT baikhyoungseon differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT hansangsun differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT jangwoowon differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT choiyoonjeong differencesinmandibularcondyleandglenoidfossamorphologyinrelationtoverticalandsagittalskeletalpatternsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy