Cargando…

Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load

Researchers of cognitive load theory and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning have identified several strategies to optimize instructional materials. In this review article we focus on five of these strategies or solutions to problematic instructional designs in multimedia learning: (a) the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro-Alonso, Juan C., de Koning, Bjorn B., Fiorella, Logan, Paas, Fred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9
_version_ 1783662034830753792
author Castro-Alonso, Juan C.
de Koning, Bjorn B.
Fiorella, Logan
Paas, Fred
author_facet Castro-Alonso, Juan C.
de Koning, Bjorn B.
Fiorella, Logan
Paas, Fred
author_sort Castro-Alonso, Juan C.
collection PubMed
description Researchers of cognitive load theory and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning have identified several strategies to optimize instructional materials. In this review article we focus on five of these strategies or solutions to problematic instructional designs in multimedia learning: (a) the multimedia principle (use visualizations and drawings to complement texts); (b) the split-attention effect or spatial contiguity principle (show texts contiguously or integrated with visualizations); (c) the redundancy effect, alike the coherence principle (remove nonessential learning information); (d) the signaling principle (cue or signal essential learning information); and (e) the transient information effect or segmenting principle (segment or control the pace of animations and videos). Usually, both cognitive theories have investigated solutions that instructors, teachers, and designers should pursue to optimize students’ learning. Here, in a novel approach, we show that these strategies can also be used by learners who want to self-manage their cognitive load and learning process. We provide several examples of both instructor- and learner-managed solutions aligned with these strategies. When assessing which agent, either the instructor or the learner, was most effective, we observed mixed results in the literature. However, the expertise reversal effect may help predict the direction of these effects: novice students may learn better under instructor-managed conditions, whereas more expert students may learn more under learner-managed conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7940870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79408702021-03-09 Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load Castro-Alonso, Juan C. de Koning, Bjorn B. Fiorella, Logan Paas, Fred Educ Psychol Rev Review Article Researchers of cognitive load theory and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning have identified several strategies to optimize instructional materials. In this review article we focus on five of these strategies or solutions to problematic instructional designs in multimedia learning: (a) the multimedia principle (use visualizations and drawings to complement texts); (b) the split-attention effect or spatial contiguity principle (show texts contiguously or integrated with visualizations); (c) the redundancy effect, alike the coherence principle (remove nonessential learning information); (d) the signaling principle (cue or signal essential learning information); and (e) the transient information effect or segmenting principle (segment or control the pace of animations and videos). Usually, both cognitive theories have investigated solutions that instructors, teachers, and designers should pursue to optimize students’ learning. Here, in a novel approach, we show that these strategies can also be used by learners who want to self-manage their cognitive load and learning process. We provide several examples of both instructor- and learner-managed solutions aligned with these strategies. When assessing which agent, either the instructor or the learner, was most effective, we observed mixed results in the literature. However, the expertise reversal effect may help predict the direction of these effects: novice students may learn better under instructor-managed conditions, whereas more expert students may learn more under learner-managed conditions. Springer US 2021-03-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7940870/ /pubmed/33716467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Article
Castro-Alonso, Juan C.
de Koning, Bjorn B.
Fiorella, Logan
Paas, Fred
Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load
title Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load
title_full Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load
title_fullStr Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load
title_full_unstemmed Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load
title_short Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load
title_sort five strategies for optimizing instructional materials: instructor- and learner-managed cognitive load
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9
work_keys_str_mv AT castroalonsojuanc fivestrategiesforoptimizinginstructionalmaterialsinstructorandlearnermanagedcognitiveload
AT dekoningbjornb fivestrategiesforoptimizinginstructionalmaterialsinstructorandlearnermanagedcognitiveload
AT fiorellalogan fivestrategiesforoptimizinginstructionalmaterialsinstructorandlearnermanagedcognitiveload
AT paasfred fivestrategiesforoptimizinginstructionalmaterialsinstructorandlearnermanagedcognitiveload