Cargando…

Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported an increased risk for second primary malignancies (SPMs) after cervical cancer (CC). This study aims to quantify and assess the risk of developing SPMs in long-term survivors of CC. METHODS: A population-based cohort of CC patients aged 20–79 years was obta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Runmei, Zhang, Yue, Ma, Bingqing, Tan, Kangming, Lynn, Henry S., Wu, Zhenyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33708866
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2003
_version_ 1783662047293079552
author Li, Runmei
Zhang, Yue
Ma, Bingqing
Tan, Kangming
Lynn, Henry S.
Wu, Zhenyu
author_facet Li, Runmei
Zhang, Yue
Ma, Bingqing
Tan, Kangming
Lynn, Henry S.
Wu, Zhenyu
author_sort Li, Runmei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported an increased risk for second primary malignancies (SPMs) after cervical cancer (CC). This study aims to quantify and assess the risk of developing SPMs in long-term survivors of CC. METHODS: A population-based cohort of CC patients aged 20–79 years was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A competing risk model and corresponding nomogram were constructed to predict the 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative risks of SPMs. A Fine-Gray plot was created to validate the model. Finally, we performed decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the model by calculating the net benefit. RESULTS: A total of 34,295 patients were identified, and approximately 6.3% of the study participants developed SPMs. According to the multivariable competing-risk model, older black CC survivors with localized disease who were treated with radiation therapy were more susceptible to SPMs. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidences of SPMs were 2.5%, 3.6%, and 6.2%, respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and observed models. The DCA yielded a wide range of risk thresholds at which the net benefits could be obtained from our proposed model. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides physicians with a practical, individualized prognostic estimate to assess the risk of SPMs among CC survivors. CC survivors remain at a high risk of developing SPMs, and further surveillance should focus especially on the patients with black race, older age, localized disease, or those having received radiation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7940922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79409222021-03-10 Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance Li, Runmei Zhang, Yue Ma, Bingqing Tan, Kangming Lynn, Henry S. Wu, Zhenyu Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported an increased risk for second primary malignancies (SPMs) after cervical cancer (CC). This study aims to quantify and assess the risk of developing SPMs in long-term survivors of CC. METHODS: A population-based cohort of CC patients aged 20–79 years was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A competing risk model and corresponding nomogram were constructed to predict the 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative risks of SPMs. A Fine-Gray plot was created to validate the model. Finally, we performed decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the model by calculating the net benefit. RESULTS: A total of 34,295 patients were identified, and approximately 6.3% of the study participants developed SPMs. According to the multivariable competing-risk model, older black CC survivors with localized disease who were treated with radiation therapy were more susceptible to SPMs. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidences of SPMs were 2.5%, 3.6%, and 6.2%, respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and observed models. The DCA yielded a wide range of risk thresholds at which the net benefits could be obtained from our proposed model. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides physicians with a practical, individualized prognostic estimate to assess the risk of SPMs among CC survivors. CC survivors remain at a high risk of developing SPMs, and further surveillance should focus especially on the patients with black race, older age, localized disease, or those having received radiation therapy. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7940922/ /pubmed/33708866 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2003 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Runmei
Zhang, Yue
Ma, Bingqing
Tan, Kangming
Lynn, Henry S.
Wu, Zhenyu
Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance
title Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance
title_full Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance
title_fullStr Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance
title_short Survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance
title_sort survival analysis of second primary malignancies after cervical cancer using a competing risk model: implications for prevention and surveillance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33708866
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2003
work_keys_str_mv AT lirunmei survivalanalysisofsecondprimarymalignanciesaftercervicalcancerusingacompetingriskmodelimplicationsforpreventionandsurveillance
AT zhangyue survivalanalysisofsecondprimarymalignanciesaftercervicalcancerusingacompetingriskmodelimplicationsforpreventionandsurveillance
AT mabingqing survivalanalysisofsecondprimarymalignanciesaftercervicalcancerusingacompetingriskmodelimplicationsforpreventionandsurveillance
AT tankangming survivalanalysisofsecondprimarymalignanciesaftercervicalcancerusingacompetingriskmodelimplicationsforpreventionandsurveillance
AT lynnhenrys survivalanalysisofsecondprimarymalignanciesaftercervicalcancerusingacompetingriskmodelimplicationsforpreventionandsurveillance
AT wuzhenyu survivalanalysisofsecondprimarymalignanciesaftercervicalcancerusingacompetingriskmodelimplicationsforpreventionandsurveillance