Cargando…
Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a prominent supraglottic airway device, widely used especially in difficult airway management. However, the LMA sizes recommended by the manufacturers are not always well matched in clinical practice, which leads to complications. To date, there are rare mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33708823 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4838 |
_version_ | 1783662047756550144 |
---|---|
author | Ren, Yaoyao Cao, Cuicui Liang, Xuan Ju, Zhihai Zhang, Ling Cui, Xu Wang, Guyan |
author_facet | Ren, Yaoyao Cao, Cuicui Liang, Xuan Ju, Zhihai Zhang, Ling Cui, Xu Wang, Guyan |
author_sort | Ren, Yaoyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a prominent supraglottic airway device, widely used especially in difficult airway management. However, the LMA sizes recommended by the manufacturers are not always well matched in clinical practice, which leads to complications. To date, there are rare models to validate whether the manufacturers’ standard is suitable for use in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 58,956 patients undergoing general anesthesia using LMA device were included in the study between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018, to validate the adherence rate of LMA sizes according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. A logistic regression analysis was performed based on the actual LMA size used in clinical practice to establish separately size selection guidelines with gender, weight, and age as variables in adults, adolescents, and children. RESULTS: LMA insertions were analyzed in 50,776 (86.1%) adults, 3,548 (6%) adolescents, and 4,632 (7.9%) children. Suitability of manufacturers’ recommendations was higher in children [male: 86.02%; female: 85.09%] than adults [male: 72.75%; female: 78.13%] or adolescents [male: 73.4%; female: 70.79%]. For adults and adolescents, LMA size was better predicted using the regression model rather than the manufacturers’ recommendations [male adults: 82.4% (81.16–83.57%) vs. 73.21% (71.79–74.59%), P<0.05; female adults: 87.82% (86.65–88.9%) vs. 77.07% (75.6–78.48%), P<0.05; male adolescents: 79.45% (74.86–83.4%) vs. 72.05% (67.09–76.53%), P<0.05; female adolescents: 78.4% (71.11–84.31%) vs. 72.22% (64.54–78.82%), P<0.05]. For children, there was equal performance suitability using the regression model and the manufacturers’ recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The model-based guidelines may provide more accurate directions for LMA size selection for adolescents and adults than the manufacturers’ weight-based recommendations, whereas the manufacturers’ recommendation in children is consistent with clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7940924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79409242021-03-10 Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study Ren, Yaoyao Cao, Cuicui Liang, Xuan Ju, Zhihai Zhang, Ling Cui, Xu Wang, Guyan Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a prominent supraglottic airway device, widely used especially in difficult airway management. However, the LMA sizes recommended by the manufacturers are not always well matched in clinical practice, which leads to complications. To date, there are rare models to validate whether the manufacturers’ standard is suitable for use in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 58,956 patients undergoing general anesthesia using LMA device were included in the study between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018, to validate the adherence rate of LMA sizes according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. A logistic regression analysis was performed based on the actual LMA size used in clinical practice to establish separately size selection guidelines with gender, weight, and age as variables in adults, adolescents, and children. RESULTS: LMA insertions were analyzed in 50,776 (86.1%) adults, 3,548 (6%) adolescents, and 4,632 (7.9%) children. Suitability of manufacturers’ recommendations was higher in children [male: 86.02%; female: 85.09%] than adults [male: 72.75%; female: 78.13%] or adolescents [male: 73.4%; female: 70.79%]. For adults and adolescents, LMA size was better predicted using the regression model rather than the manufacturers’ recommendations [male adults: 82.4% (81.16–83.57%) vs. 73.21% (71.79–74.59%), P<0.05; female adults: 87.82% (86.65–88.9%) vs. 77.07% (75.6–78.48%), P<0.05; male adolescents: 79.45% (74.86–83.4%) vs. 72.05% (67.09–76.53%), P<0.05; female adolescents: 78.4% (71.11–84.31%) vs. 72.22% (64.54–78.82%), P<0.05]. For children, there was equal performance suitability using the regression model and the manufacturers’ recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The model-based guidelines may provide more accurate directions for LMA size selection for adolescents and adults than the manufacturers’ weight-based recommendations, whereas the manufacturers’ recommendation in children is consistent with clinical practice. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7940924/ /pubmed/33708823 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4838 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ren, Yaoyao Cao, Cuicui Liang, Xuan Ju, Zhihai Zhang, Ling Cui, Xu Wang, Guyan Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study |
title | Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study |
title_full | Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study |
title_short | Validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study |
title_sort | validation of manufacturers’ laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33708823 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renyaoyao validationofmanufacturerslaryngealmaskairwaysizeselectionstandardalargeretrospectivestudy AT caocuicui validationofmanufacturerslaryngealmaskairwaysizeselectionstandardalargeretrospectivestudy AT liangxuan validationofmanufacturerslaryngealmaskairwaysizeselectionstandardalargeretrospectivestudy AT juzhihai validationofmanufacturerslaryngealmaskairwaysizeselectionstandardalargeretrospectivestudy AT zhangling validationofmanufacturerslaryngealmaskairwaysizeselectionstandardalargeretrospectivestudy AT cuixu validationofmanufacturerslaryngealmaskairwaysizeselectionstandardalargeretrospectivestudy AT wangguyan validationofmanufacturerslaryngealmaskairwaysizeselectionstandardalargeretrospectivestudy |