Cargando…

Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND: This is a retrospective review of synovial sarcoma (SS) patients treated over the last 12 years in Western Australia (WA). SS is both chemo and radiotherapy sensitive. Results of trials in adjuvant chemotherapy are conflicting and there is limited support for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Yasir, Carey‐Smith, Richard, Taylor, Mandy, Woodhouse, Jennifer, Jacques, Angela, Wood, David, Long, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1268
_version_ 1783662149935038464
author Khan, Yasir
Carey‐Smith, Richard
Taylor, Mandy
Woodhouse, Jennifer
Jacques, Angela
Wood, David
Long, Anne
author_facet Khan, Yasir
Carey‐Smith, Richard
Taylor, Mandy
Woodhouse, Jennifer
Jacques, Angela
Wood, David
Long, Anne
author_sort Khan, Yasir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This is a retrospective review of synovial sarcoma (SS) patients treated over the last 12 years in Western Australia (WA). SS is both chemo and radiotherapy sensitive. Results of trials in adjuvant chemotherapy are conflicting and there is limited support for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of combined chemoradiotherapy is based on institutional preferences. AIM: We reviewed the outcomes for SS patients treated in WA over a 12 year period focusing on patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). METHODS: Patient details including demographics, histopathology, treatment details, were obtained from the WA sarcoma database (2006‐2018). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were derived for whole cohort. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients were identified with SS with equal gender incidence. Median age of the cohort was 36 (14‐76) years. The most common primary site of disease was extremity (81.5%). 22/27 patients presented with only localized disease and 59.2% of these received neo‐adjuvant treatment. Of those who received neoadjuvant treatment, 56.2% had NACRT, while 25.0% and 18.7% of patients had chemotherapy and radiotherapy respectively. Mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, dacarbazine (MAID) was the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment while ifosfamide (93.7%) was the most commonly used chemotherapy drug in any setting. There was no reported case of disease progression in group of patients who received NACRT apart from one patient who had oligometastatic disease at diagnosis. Median OS of the whole cohort was 38 months while median PFS was 24 months. Bone marrow toxicity was the most commonly reported high grade toxicity in NACRT group (55.5%) but there were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: NACRT is not widely adopted and treatment is based on institutional preferences, however our data shows that NACRT is a feasible therapy option. NACRT should be evaluated prospectively in a randomized trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7941415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79414152021-05-10 Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Khan, Yasir Carey‐Smith, Richard Taylor, Mandy Woodhouse, Jennifer Jacques, Angela Wood, David Long, Anne Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: This is a retrospective review of synovial sarcoma (SS) patients treated over the last 12 years in Western Australia (WA). SS is both chemo and radiotherapy sensitive. Results of trials in adjuvant chemotherapy are conflicting and there is limited support for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of combined chemoradiotherapy is based on institutional preferences. AIM: We reviewed the outcomes for SS patients treated in WA over a 12 year period focusing on patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). METHODS: Patient details including demographics, histopathology, treatment details, were obtained from the WA sarcoma database (2006‐2018). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were derived for whole cohort. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients were identified with SS with equal gender incidence. Median age of the cohort was 36 (14‐76) years. The most common primary site of disease was extremity (81.5%). 22/27 patients presented with only localized disease and 59.2% of these received neo‐adjuvant treatment. Of those who received neoadjuvant treatment, 56.2% had NACRT, while 25.0% and 18.7% of patients had chemotherapy and radiotherapy respectively. Mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, dacarbazine (MAID) was the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment while ifosfamide (93.7%) was the most commonly used chemotherapy drug in any setting. There was no reported case of disease progression in group of patients who received NACRT apart from one patient who had oligometastatic disease at diagnosis. Median OS of the whole cohort was 38 months while median PFS was 24 months. Bone marrow toxicity was the most commonly reported high grade toxicity in NACRT group (55.5%) but there were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: NACRT is not widely adopted and treatment is based on institutional preferences, however our data shows that NACRT is a feasible therapy option. NACRT should be evaluated prospectively in a randomized trial. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7941415/ /pubmed/32881345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1268 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Khan, Yasir
Carey‐Smith, Richard
Taylor, Mandy
Woodhouse, Jennifer
Jacques, Angela
Wood, David
Long, Anne
Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_short Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_sort treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in western australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1268
work_keys_str_mv AT khanyasir treatmentandoutcomesforsynovialsarcomapatientsinwesternaustraliatheroleofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT careysmithrichard treatmentandoutcomesforsynovialsarcomapatientsinwesternaustraliatheroleofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT taylormandy treatmentandoutcomesforsynovialsarcomapatientsinwesternaustraliatheroleofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT woodhousejennifer treatmentandoutcomesforsynovialsarcomapatientsinwesternaustraliatheroleofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT jacquesangela treatmentandoutcomesforsynovialsarcomapatientsinwesternaustraliatheroleofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT wooddavid treatmentandoutcomesforsynovialsarcomapatientsinwesternaustraliatheroleofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT longanne treatmentandoutcomesforsynovialsarcomapatientsinwesternaustraliatheroleofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy