Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVES: The majority of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 can be managed using virtual care. Dyspnoea is challenging to assess remotely, and the accuracy of subjective dyspnoea measures in capturing hypoxaemia have not been formally evaluated for COVID-19. We explored the accuracy of subje...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046282 |
_version_ | 1783662175110299648 |
---|---|
author | Berezin, Linor Zhabokritsky, Alice Andany, Nisha Chan, Adrienne K Estrada-Codecido, Jose Gershon, Andrea Lam, Philip W Leis, Jerome A MacPhee, Scott Mubareka, Samira Simor, Andrew E Daneman, Nick |
author_facet | Berezin, Linor Zhabokritsky, Alice Andany, Nisha Chan, Adrienne K Estrada-Codecido, Jose Gershon, Andrea Lam, Philip W Leis, Jerome A MacPhee, Scott Mubareka, Samira Simor, Andrew E Daneman, Nick |
author_sort | Berezin, Linor |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The majority of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 can be managed using virtual care. Dyspnoea is challenging to assess remotely, and the accuracy of subjective dyspnoea measures in capturing hypoxaemia have not been formally evaluated for COVID-19. We explored the accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in diagnosing hypoxaemia in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive outpatients with COVID-19 who met criteria for home oxygen saturation monitoring at a university-affiliated acute care hospital in Toronto, Canada from 3 April 2020 to 13 September 2020. Dyspnoea measures were treated as diagnostic tests, and we determined their sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), negative/positive predictive value (NPV/PPV) and positive/negative likelihood ratios (+LR/−LR) for detecting hypoxaemia. In the primary analysis, hypoxaemia was defined by oxygen saturation <95%; the diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea was also assessed across a range of oxygen saturation cutoffs from 92% to 97%. RESULTS: During the study period, 89/501 (17.8%) of patients met criteria for home oxygen saturation monitoring, and of these 17/89 (19.1%) were diagnosed with hypoxaemia. The presence/absence of dyspnoea had limited accuracy for diagnosing hypoxaemia, with SN 47% (95% CI 24% to 72%), SP 80% (95% CI 68% to 88%), NPV 86% (95% CI 75% to 93%), PPV 36% (95% CI 18% to 59%), +LR 2.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.7) and −LR 0.7 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.1). The SN of dyspnoea was 50% (95% CI 19% to 81%) when a cut-off of <92% was used to define hypoxaemia. A modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea score >1 (SP 98%, 95% CI 88% to 100%), Roth maximal count <12 (SP 100%, 95% CI 75% to 100%) and Roth counting time <8 s (SP 93%, 95% CI 66% to 100%) had high SP that could be used to rule in hypoxaemia, but displayed low SN (≤50%). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective dyspnoea measures have inadequate accuracy for ruling out hypoxaemia in high-risk patients with COVID-19. Safe home management of patients with COVID-19 should incorporate home oxygenation saturation monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7941675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79416752021-03-09 Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study Berezin, Linor Zhabokritsky, Alice Andany, Nisha Chan, Adrienne K Estrada-Codecido, Jose Gershon, Andrea Lam, Philip W Leis, Jerome A MacPhee, Scott Mubareka, Samira Simor, Andrew E Daneman, Nick BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: The majority of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 can be managed using virtual care. Dyspnoea is challenging to assess remotely, and the accuracy of subjective dyspnoea measures in capturing hypoxaemia have not been formally evaluated for COVID-19. We explored the accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in diagnosing hypoxaemia in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive outpatients with COVID-19 who met criteria for home oxygen saturation monitoring at a university-affiliated acute care hospital in Toronto, Canada from 3 April 2020 to 13 September 2020. Dyspnoea measures were treated as diagnostic tests, and we determined their sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), negative/positive predictive value (NPV/PPV) and positive/negative likelihood ratios (+LR/−LR) for detecting hypoxaemia. In the primary analysis, hypoxaemia was defined by oxygen saturation <95%; the diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea was also assessed across a range of oxygen saturation cutoffs from 92% to 97%. RESULTS: During the study period, 89/501 (17.8%) of patients met criteria for home oxygen saturation monitoring, and of these 17/89 (19.1%) were diagnosed with hypoxaemia. The presence/absence of dyspnoea had limited accuracy for diagnosing hypoxaemia, with SN 47% (95% CI 24% to 72%), SP 80% (95% CI 68% to 88%), NPV 86% (95% CI 75% to 93%), PPV 36% (95% CI 18% to 59%), +LR 2.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.7) and −LR 0.7 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.1). The SN of dyspnoea was 50% (95% CI 19% to 81%) when a cut-off of <92% was used to define hypoxaemia. A modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea score >1 (SP 98%, 95% CI 88% to 100%), Roth maximal count <12 (SP 100%, 95% CI 75% to 100%) and Roth counting time <8 s (SP 93%, 95% CI 66% to 100%) had high SP that could be used to rule in hypoxaemia, but displayed low SN (≤50%). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective dyspnoea measures have inadequate accuracy for ruling out hypoxaemia in high-risk patients with COVID-19. Safe home management of patients with COVID-19 should incorporate home oxygenation saturation monitoring. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7941675/ /pubmed/34006036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046282 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Berezin, Linor Zhabokritsky, Alice Andany, Nisha Chan, Adrienne K Estrada-Codecido, Jose Gershon, Andrea Lam, Philip W Leis, Jerome A MacPhee, Scott Mubareka, Samira Simor, Andrew E Daneman, Nick Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of subjective dyspnoea in detecting hypoxaemia among outpatients with covid-19: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berezinlinor diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhabokritskyalice diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT andanynisha diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT chanadriennek diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT estradacodecidojose diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT gershonandrea diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT lamphilipw diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT leisjeromea diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT macpheescott diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT mubarekasamira diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT simorandrewe diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT danemannick diagnosticaccuracyofsubjectivedyspnoeaindetectinghypoxaemiaamongoutpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy |