Cargando…

Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ-GIST) is surgically challenging. This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Wenjun, Xu, Yuting, Chen, Tao, Feng, Xingyu, Zhou, Rui, Wan, Jin, Li, Yong, Li, Guoxin, Wang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707927
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.05
_version_ 1783662177718108160
author Xiong, Wenjun
Xu, Yuting
Chen, Tao
Feng, Xingyu
Zhou, Rui
Wan, Jin
Li, Yong
Li, Guoxin
Wang, Wei
author_facet Xiong, Wenjun
Xu, Yuting
Chen, Tao
Feng, Xingyu
Zhou, Rui
Wan, Jin
Li, Yong
Li, Guoxin
Wang, Wei
author_sort Xiong, Wenjun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ-GIST) is surgically challenging. This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting (PSW) method. METHODS: Between April 2006 and April 2018, 1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China. Of these patients, 228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics, operative information, and long-term outcomes. PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts. RESULTS: PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, mitotic rates and recurrence risk. After PSW, 438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic (L group) and 225 open surgery (O group) patients were enrolled. After PSW, the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the O group: median operative time [interquartile range (IQR)]: 100.0 (64.5−141.5)vs. 149.0 (104.0−197.5) min, P<0.001; median blood loss (IQR): 30.0 (10.0−50.0)vs. 50.0 (20.0−100.0) mL, P=0.002; median time to liquid intake (IQR): 3.0 (2.0−4.0)vs. 4.0 (3.0−5.0) d, P<0.001; median hospital stay (IQR): 6.0 (4.0−8.0)vs. 7.0 (5.0−12.0) d, P<0.001; and postoperative complications (10.3%vs. 22.7%, P=0.001). The median follow-up was 55 (range, 2−153) months in the entire cohort. No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.372, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.072−1.910, P=0.236) or overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.119−1.343, P=0.138) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, shorter time to liquid intake, and shorter length of stay, all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7941686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79416862021-03-10 Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting Xiong, Wenjun Xu, Yuting Chen, Tao Feng, Xingyu Zhou, Rui Wan, Jin Li, Yong Li, Guoxin Wang, Wei Chin J Cancer Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ-GIST) is surgically challenging. This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting (PSW) method. METHODS: Between April 2006 and April 2018, 1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China. Of these patients, 228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics, operative information, and long-term outcomes. PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts. RESULTS: PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, mitotic rates and recurrence risk. After PSW, 438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic (L group) and 225 open surgery (O group) patients were enrolled. After PSW, the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the O group: median operative time [interquartile range (IQR)]: 100.0 (64.5−141.5)vs. 149.0 (104.0−197.5) min, P<0.001; median blood loss (IQR): 30.0 (10.0−50.0)vs. 50.0 (20.0−100.0) mL, P=0.002; median time to liquid intake (IQR): 3.0 (2.0−4.0)vs. 4.0 (3.0−5.0) d, P<0.001; median hospital stay (IQR): 6.0 (4.0−8.0)vs. 7.0 (5.0−12.0) d, P<0.001; and postoperative complications (10.3%vs. 22.7%, P=0.001). The median follow-up was 55 (range, 2−153) months in the entire cohort. No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.372, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.072−1.910, P=0.236) or overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.119−1.343, P=0.138) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, shorter time to liquid intake, and shorter length of stay, all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival. AME Publishing Company 2021-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7941686/ /pubmed/33707927 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.05 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Xiong, Wenjun
Xu, Yuting
Chen, Tao
Feng, Xingyu
Zhou, Rui
Wan, Jin
Li, Yong
Li, Guoxin
Wang, Wei
Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
title Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
title_full Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
title_fullStr Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
title_short Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
title_sort laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: a multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707927
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.05
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongwenjun laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT xuyuting laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT chentao laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT fengxingyu laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT zhourui laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT wanjin laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT liyong laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT liguoxin laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting
AT wangwei laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsofesophagogastricjunctionamulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysiswithpropensityscoreweighting