Cargando…

Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)

OBJECTIVE: Multi-center data on the current status and trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China are lacking. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the current clinical practice pattern of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among Chinese female patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Feng, Lei, Chuqi, Cao, Heng, Liu, Jun, Li, Jie, Jiang, Hongchuan, Chinese Society of Breast Surgery
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707926
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.04
_version_ 1783662178183675904
author Xu, Feng
Lei, Chuqi
Cao, Heng
Liu, Jun
Li, Jie
Jiang, Hongchuan
Chinese Society of Breast Surgery,
author_facet Xu, Feng
Lei, Chuqi
Cao, Heng
Liu, Jun
Li, Jie
Jiang, Hongchuan
Chinese Society of Breast Surgery,
author_sort Xu, Feng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Multi-center data on the current status and trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China are lacking. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the current clinical practice pattern of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among Chinese female patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire used to collect information on breast reconstruction among females diagnosed with breast cancer was distributed by 31 members of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Information was collected on tumor characteristics, treatment, mesh application, nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation, postoperative complications, bilateral reconstruction, patient satisfaction and local recurrence. The overall rate of breast reconstruction was assessed, and the characteristics were compared across patient groups with different reconstruction approaches. RESULTS: A total of 1,554 patients underwent breast reconstruction after total mastectomy, with a reconstruction rate of 9.6%. Among them, 1,190 were implant-based, and 262 underwent autologous reconstructions, while 102 cases underwent a combination of both. Patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction were younger than those who received autologous reconstruction (40.1±4.6 vs. 45.0±5.9, P=0.004). Compared to patients with autologous reconstruction, mesh application (25.5% vs. 6.5%), NAC preservation (51.8% vs. 40.5%) and reconstruction failure (1.8% vs. 0) were more frequently reported among those with implant-based reconstruction. There was no significant difference in general satisfaction across three reconstruction approaches, though patients with autologous reconstruction reported the highest aesthetic satisfaction among the three groups (P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Implant-based breast reconstruction remains the dominant choice among patients, while autologous reconstruction was associated with higher aesthetic satisfaction. Our multi-center investigation based on the findings of the tertiary hospitals of Chinese Society of Breast Surgery may guide a future series of clinical studies on breast reconstruction in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7941688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79416882021-03-10 Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004) Xu, Feng Lei, Chuqi Cao, Heng Liu, Jun Li, Jie Jiang, Hongchuan Chinese Society of Breast Surgery, Chin J Cancer Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: Multi-center data on the current status and trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China are lacking. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the current clinical practice pattern of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among Chinese female patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire used to collect information on breast reconstruction among females diagnosed with breast cancer was distributed by 31 members of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Information was collected on tumor characteristics, treatment, mesh application, nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation, postoperative complications, bilateral reconstruction, patient satisfaction and local recurrence. The overall rate of breast reconstruction was assessed, and the characteristics were compared across patient groups with different reconstruction approaches. RESULTS: A total of 1,554 patients underwent breast reconstruction after total mastectomy, with a reconstruction rate of 9.6%. Among them, 1,190 were implant-based, and 262 underwent autologous reconstructions, while 102 cases underwent a combination of both. Patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction were younger than those who received autologous reconstruction (40.1±4.6 vs. 45.0±5.9, P=0.004). Compared to patients with autologous reconstruction, mesh application (25.5% vs. 6.5%), NAC preservation (51.8% vs. 40.5%) and reconstruction failure (1.8% vs. 0) were more frequently reported among those with implant-based reconstruction. There was no significant difference in general satisfaction across three reconstruction approaches, though patients with autologous reconstruction reported the highest aesthetic satisfaction among the three groups (P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Implant-based breast reconstruction remains the dominant choice among patients, while autologous reconstruction was associated with higher aesthetic satisfaction. Our multi-center investigation based on the findings of the tertiary hospitals of Chinese Society of Breast Surgery may guide a future series of clinical studies on breast reconstruction in China. AME Publishing Company 2021-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7941688/ /pubmed/33707926 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.04 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Xu, Feng
Lei, Chuqi
Cao, Heng
Liu, Jun
Li, Jie
Jiang, Hongchuan
Chinese Society of Breast Surgery,
Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)
title Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)
title_full Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)
title_fullStr Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)
title_full_unstemmed Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)
title_short Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)
title_sort multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from chinese society of breast surgery: a survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (csbrs-004)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707926
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.04
work_keys_str_mv AT xufeng multicenterinvestigationofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyfromchinesesocietyofbreastsurgeryasurveybasedon31tertiaryhospitalscsbrs004
AT leichuqi multicenterinvestigationofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyfromchinesesocietyofbreastsurgeryasurveybasedon31tertiaryhospitalscsbrs004
AT caoheng multicenterinvestigationofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyfromchinesesocietyofbreastsurgeryasurveybasedon31tertiaryhospitalscsbrs004
AT liujun multicenterinvestigationofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyfromchinesesocietyofbreastsurgeryasurveybasedon31tertiaryhospitalscsbrs004
AT lijie multicenterinvestigationofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyfromchinesesocietyofbreastsurgeryasurveybasedon31tertiaryhospitalscsbrs004
AT jianghongchuan multicenterinvestigationofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyfromchinesesocietyofbreastsurgeryasurveybasedon31tertiaryhospitalscsbrs004
AT chinesesocietyofbreastsurgery multicenterinvestigationofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyfromchinesesocietyofbreastsurgeryasurveybasedon31tertiaryhospitalscsbrs004