Cargando…
An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018
Metal halide lights (MHLs) emit ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and should be used with enclosed fixtures. We investigated a cluster of blurred vision in a locality in South India reported among light music event attendees to identify risk factors. METHODS: We searched for attendees with any eye-related...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33778353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000118 |
_version_ | 1783662192732667904 |
---|---|
author | Rubeshkumar, Polani Ponnaiah, Manickam Prakash, S. Varun Balasubramanian, Ramanujam Somasundaram, Shanmugham Premkumar, Balasubramanian Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana Murhekar, Manoj V. |
author_facet | Rubeshkumar, Polani Ponnaiah, Manickam Prakash, S. Varun Balasubramanian, Ramanujam Somasundaram, Shanmugham Premkumar, Balasubramanian Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana Murhekar, Manoj V. |
author_sort | Rubeshkumar, Polani |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metal halide lights (MHLs) emit ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and should be used with enclosed fixtures. We investigated a cluster of blurred vision in a locality in South India reported among light music event attendees to identify risk factors. METHODS: We searched for attendees with any eye-related symptoms by door-to-door. We described cases by time, place, and person and inspected the environment to generate a hypothesis. We followed-up the cohort of the attendees to examine the hypothesis of exposure to MHL as the cause of the outbreak. We computed relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by comparing attack rates among attendees by seating location and duration of exposure. RESULTS: Of the total 500 attendees, we could interview 319 (64%) and 89% (284/319) attendees developed bilateral photokeratitis (median age = 24 years [range: 2–80 years]). Attack rate was higher among female (92% [172/189]) than male (85% [110/130]). Attack rate among those seated within 12 meters from dais was higher (95% [241/253]) than the rest (65% [43/66]; RR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.2, 1.7) and attack rate was higher among those continuously exposed to MHL (97% [268/277]) than others (38% [16/42]; RR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.7, 3.7). The duration of exposure was associated with increased risk of bilateral photokeratitis (χ(2) test for linear trend = 74; P < 0.00001). During the environmental inspection, we identified the use of MHL with a broken outer envelope. CONCLUSIONS: Photokeratitis was associated with exposure to UVR from MHL with a broken outer envelope. We recommended the usage of MHL along with enclosed fixtures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7941794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79417942021-03-26 An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 Rubeshkumar, Polani Ponnaiah, Manickam Prakash, S. Varun Balasubramanian, Ramanujam Somasundaram, Shanmugham Premkumar, Balasubramanian Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana Murhekar, Manoj V. Environ Epidemiol Original Research Article Metal halide lights (MHLs) emit ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and should be used with enclosed fixtures. We investigated a cluster of blurred vision in a locality in South India reported among light music event attendees to identify risk factors. METHODS: We searched for attendees with any eye-related symptoms by door-to-door. We described cases by time, place, and person and inspected the environment to generate a hypothesis. We followed-up the cohort of the attendees to examine the hypothesis of exposure to MHL as the cause of the outbreak. We computed relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by comparing attack rates among attendees by seating location and duration of exposure. RESULTS: Of the total 500 attendees, we could interview 319 (64%) and 89% (284/319) attendees developed bilateral photokeratitis (median age = 24 years [range: 2–80 years]). Attack rate was higher among female (92% [172/189]) than male (85% [110/130]). Attack rate among those seated within 12 meters from dais was higher (95% [241/253]) than the rest (65% [43/66]; RR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.2, 1.7) and attack rate was higher among those continuously exposed to MHL (97% [268/277]) than others (38% [16/42]; RR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.7, 3.7). The duration of exposure was associated with increased risk of bilateral photokeratitis (χ(2) test for linear trend = 74; P < 0.00001). During the environmental inspection, we identified the use of MHL with a broken outer envelope. CONCLUSIONS: Photokeratitis was associated with exposure to UVR from MHL with a broken outer envelope. We recommended the usage of MHL along with enclosed fixtures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7941794/ /pubmed/33778353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000118 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Environmental Epidemiology. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Rubeshkumar, Polani Ponnaiah, Manickam Prakash, S. Varun Balasubramanian, Ramanujam Somasundaram, Shanmugham Premkumar, Balasubramanian Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana Murhekar, Manoj V. An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 |
title | An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 |
title_full | An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 |
title_fullStr | An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed | An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 |
title_short | An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 |
title_sort | outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, tamil nadu, india, 2018 |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33778353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubeshkumarpolani anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT ponnaiahmanickam anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT prakashsvarun anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT balasubramanianramanujam anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT somasundaramshanmugham anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT premkumarbalasubramanian anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT gounderkolandaswamykarumana anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT murhekarmanojv anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT rubeshkumarpolani outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT ponnaiahmanickam outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT prakashsvarun outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT balasubramanianramanujam outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT somasundaramshanmugham outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT premkumarbalasubramanian outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT gounderkolandaswamykarumana outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 AT murhekarmanojv outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018 |