Cargando…

An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018

Metal halide lights (MHLs) emit ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and should be used with enclosed fixtures. We investigated a cluster of blurred vision in a locality in South India reported among light music event attendees to identify risk factors. METHODS: We searched for attendees with any eye-related...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubeshkumar, Polani, Ponnaiah, Manickam, Prakash, S. Varun, Balasubramanian, Ramanujam, Somasundaram, Shanmugham, Premkumar, Balasubramanian, Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana, Murhekar, Manoj V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33778353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000118
_version_ 1783662192732667904
author Rubeshkumar, Polani
Ponnaiah, Manickam
Prakash, S. Varun
Balasubramanian, Ramanujam
Somasundaram, Shanmugham
Premkumar, Balasubramanian
Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana
Murhekar, Manoj V.
author_facet Rubeshkumar, Polani
Ponnaiah, Manickam
Prakash, S. Varun
Balasubramanian, Ramanujam
Somasundaram, Shanmugham
Premkumar, Balasubramanian
Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana
Murhekar, Manoj V.
author_sort Rubeshkumar, Polani
collection PubMed
description Metal halide lights (MHLs) emit ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and should be used with enclosed fixtures. We investigated a cluster of blurred vision in a locality in South India reported among light music event attendees to identify risk factors. METHODS: We searched for attendees with any eye-related symptoms by door-to-door. We described cases by time, place, and person and inspected the environment to generate a hypothesis. We followed-up the cohort of the attendees to examine the hypothesis of exposure to MHL as the cause of the outbreak. We computed relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by comparing attack rates among attendees by seating location and duration of exposure. RESULTS: Of the total 500 attendees, we could interview 319 (64%) and 89% (284/319) attendees developed bilateral photokeratitis (median age = 24 years [range: 2–80 years]). Attack rate was higher among female (92% [172/189]) than male (85% [110/130]). Attack rate among those seated within 12 meters from dais was higher (95% [241/253]) than the rest (65% [43/66]; RR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.2, 1.7) and attack rate was higher among those continuously exposed to MHL (97% [268/277]) than others (38% [16/42]; RR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.7, 3.7). The duration of exposure was associated with increased risk of bilateral photokeratitis (χ(2) test for linear trend = 74; P < 0.00001). During the environmental inspection, we identified the use of MHL with a broken outer envelope. CONCLUSIONS: Photokeratitis was associated with exposure to UVR from MHL with a broken outer envelope. We recommended the usage of MHL along with enclosed fixtures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7941794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79417942021-03-26 An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018 Rubeshkumar, Polani Ponnaiah, Manickam Prakash, S. Varun Balasubramanian, Ramanujam Somasundaram, Shanmugham Premkumar, Balasubramanian Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana Murhekar, Manoj V. Environ Epidemiol Original Research Article Metal halide lights (MHLs) emit ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and should be used with enclosed fixtures. We investigated a cluster of blurred vision in a locality in South India reported among light music event attendees to identify risk factors. METHODS: We searched for attendees with any eye-related symptoms by door-to-door. We described cases by time, place, and person and inspected the environment to generate a hypothesis. We followed-up the cohort of the attendees to examine the hypothesis of exposure to MHL as the cause of the outbreak. We computed relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by comparing attack rates among attendees by seating location and duration of exposure. RESULTS: Of the total 500 attendees, we could interview 319 (64%) and 89% (284/319) attendees developed bilateral photokeratitis (median age = 24 years [range: 2–80 years]). Attack rate was higher among female (92% [172/189]) than male (85% [110/130]). Attack rate among those seated within 12 meters from dais was higher (95% [241/253]) than the rest (65% [43/66]; RR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.2, 1.7) and attack rate was higher among those continuously exposed to MHL (97% [268/277]) than others (38% [16/42]; RR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.7, 3.7). The duration of exposure was associated with increased risk of bilateral photokeratitis (χ(2) test for linear trend = 74; P < 0.00001). During the environmental inspection, we identified the use of MHL with a broken outer envelope. CONCLUSIONS: Photokeratitis was associated with exposure to UVR from MHL with a broken outer envelope. We recommended the usage of MHL along with enclosed fixtures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7941794/ /pubmed/33778353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000118 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Environmental Epidemiology. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Rubeshkumar, Polani
Ponnaiah, Manickam
Prakash, S. Varun
Balasubramanian, Ramanujam
Somasundaram, Shanmugham
Premkumar, Balasubramanian
Gounder, Kolandaswamy Karumana
Murhekar, Manoj V.
An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018
title An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018
title_full An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018
title_fullStr An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018
title_full_unstemmed An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018
title_short An outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, Tamil Nadu, India, 2018
title_sort outbreak of bilateral photokeratitis and eyelid erythema following exposure to an artificial source of ultraviolet radiation, tamil nadu, india, 2018
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33778353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000118
work_keys_str_mv AT rubeshkumarpolani anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT ponnaiahmanickam anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT prakashsvarun anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT balasubramanianramanujam anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT somasundaramshanmugham anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT premkumarbalasubramanian anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT gounderkolandaswamykarumana anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT murhekarmanojv anoutbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT rubeshkumarpolani outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT ponnaiahmanickam outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT prakashsvarun outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT balasubramanianramanujam outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT somasundaramshanmugham outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT premkumarbalasubramanian outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT gounderkolandaswamykarumana outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018
AT murhekarmanojv outbreakofbilateralphotokeratitisandeyeliderythemafollowingexposuretoanartificialsourceofultravioletradiationtamilnaduindia2018