Cargando…

Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Lang, Jin, Hua, Xie, Xiao-li, Cao, Yang-tian, Liu, Zhen-hua, Li, Na, Jin, Peng, He, Yu-qi, Sheng, Jian-qiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9
_version_ 1783662213018419200
author Yang, Lang
Jin, Hua
Xie, Xiao-li
Cao, Yang-tian
Liu, Zhen-hua
Li, Na
Jin, Peng
He, Yu-qi
Sheng, Jian-qiu
author_facet Yang, Lang
Jin, Hua
Xie, Xiao-li
Cao, Yang-tian
Liu, Zhen-hua
Li, Na
Jin, Peng
He, Yu-qi
Sheng, Jian-qiu
author_sort Yang, Lang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatment. In this study we aimed to investigate how to solve this histological discrepancy and avoid over- and under-treatment. METHODS: The medical records of patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia who underwent endoscopic resection at our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The histological discrepancy between the biopsy and resected specimens was calculated and its association with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 137 lesions from 129 patients were included. The discrepancy rate between forceps biopsy and resected specimens was 45.3% (62/137). Histological discrepancy was associated with the histological category of the biopsy (p < 0.001). In addition, 17 of the 30 (56.7%) biopsies that was diagnosed as indefinite/negative for neoplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were upgraded to HGIN or ESCC after resection. The upgrade was due to lesion size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.002) and type B intrapapillary capillary loops (p < 0.001). Moreover, 34 of the 83 biopsies that were diagnosed with HGIN were upgraded to ESCC after resection, which was related to lesion size (p = 0.001), location (p = 0.018), and pink color sign (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Histological discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resected specimens is common in clinical practice. Recognizing the risk factors for each histological category of biopsy may reduce these discrepancies and improve clinical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7941920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79419202021-03-09 Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens Yang, Lang Jin, Hua Xie, Xiao-li Cao, Yang-tian Liu, Zhen-hua Li, Na Jin, Peng He, Yu-qi Sheng, Jian-qiu BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatment. In this study we aimed to investigate how to solve this histological discrepancy and avoid over- and under-treatment. METHODS: The medical records of patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia who underwent endoscopic resection at our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The histological discrepancy between the biopsy and resected specimens was calculated and its association with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 137 lesions from 129 patients were included. The discrepancy rate between forceps biopsy and resected specimens was 45.3% (62/137). Histological discrepancy was associated with the histological category of the biopsy (p < 0.001). In addition, 17 of the 30 (56.7%) biopsies that was diagnosed as indefinite/negative for neoplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were upgraded to HGIN or ESCC after resection. The upgrade was due to lesion size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.002) and type B intrapapillary capillary loops (p < 0.001). Moreover, 34 of the 83 biopsies that were diagnosed with HGIN were upgraded to ESCC after resection, which was related to lesion size (p = 0.001), location (p = 0.018), and pink color sign (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Histological discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resected specimens is common in clinical practice. Recognizing the risk factors for each histological category of biopsy may reduce these discrepancies and improve clinical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9. BioMed Central 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7941920/ /pubmed/33750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Lang
Jin, Hua
Xie, Xiao-li
Cao, Yang-tian
Liu, Zhen-hua
Li, Na
Jin, Peng
He, Yu-qi
Sheng, Jian-qiu
Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
title Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
title_full Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
title_fullStr Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
title_short Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
title_sort endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglang endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT jinhua endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT xiexiaoli endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT caoyangtian endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT liuzhenhua endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT lina endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT jinpeng endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT heyuqi endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens
AT shengjianqiu endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens