Cargando…
Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9 |
_version_ | 1783662213018419200 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Lang Jin, Hua Xie, Xiao-li Cao, Yang-tian Liu, Zhen-hua Li, Na Jin, Peng He, Yu-qi Sheng, Jian-qiu |
author_facet | Yang, Lang Jin, Hua Xie, Xiao-li Cao, Yang-tian Liu, Zhen-hua Li, Na Jin, Peng He, Yu-qi Sheng, Jian-qiu |
author_sort | Yang, Lang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatment. In this study we aimed to investigate how to solve this histological discrepancy and avoid over- and under-treatment. METHODS: The medical records of patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia who underwent endoscopic resection at our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The histological discrepancy between the biopsy and resected specimens was calculated and its association with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 137 lesions from 129 patients were included. The discrepancy rate between forceps biopsy and resected specimens was 45.3% (62/137). Histological discrepancy was associated with the histological category of the biopsy (p < 0.001). In addition, 17 of the 30 (56.7%) biopsies that was diagnosed as indefinite/negative for neoplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were upgraded to HGIN or ESCC after resection. The upgrade was due to lesion size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.002) and type B intrapapillary capillary loops (p < 0.001). Moreover, 34 of the 83 biopsies that were diagnosed with HGIN were upgraded to ESCC after resection, which was related to lesion size (p = 0.001), location (p = 0.018), and pink color sign (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Histological discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resected specimens is common in clinical practice. Recognizing the risk factors for each histological category of biopsy may reduce these discrepancies and improve clinical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7941920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79419202021-03-09 Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens Yang, Lang Jin, Hua Xie, Xiao-li Cao, Yang-tian Liu, Zhen-hua Li, Na Jin, Peng He, Yu-qi Sheng, Jian-qiu BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatment. In this study we aimed to investigate how to solve this histological discrepancy and avoid over- and under-treatment. METHODS: The medical records of patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia who underwent endoscopic resection at our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The histological discrepancy between the biopsy and resected specimens was calculated and its association with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 137 lesions from 129 patients were included. The discrepancy rate between forceps biopsy and resected specimens was 45.3% (62/137). Histological discrepancy was associated with the histological category of the biopsy (p < 0.001). In addition, 17 of the 30 (56.7%) biopsies that was diagnosed as indefinite/negative for neoplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were upgraded to HGIN or ESCC after resection. The upgrade was due to lesion size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.002) and type B intrapapillary capillary loops (p < 0.001). Moreover, 34 of the 83 biopsies that were diagnosed with HGIN were upgraded to ESCC after resection, which was related to lesion size (p = 0.001), location (p = 0.018), and pink color sign (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Histological discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resected specimens is common in clinical practice. Recognizing the risk factors for each histological category of biopsy may reduce these discrepancies and improve clinical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9. BioMed Central 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7941920/ /pubmed/33750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Lang Jin, Hua Xie, Xiao-li Cao, Yang-tian Liu, Zhen-hua Li, Na Jin, Peng He, Yu-qi Sheng, Jian-qiu Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens |
title | Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens |
title_full | Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens |
title_short | Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens |
title_sort | endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanglang endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT jinhua endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT xiexiaoli endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT caoyangtian endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT liuzhenhua endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT lina endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT jinpeng endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT heyuqi endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens AT shengjianqiu endoscopicresectionsforsuperficialesophagealsquamouscellepithelialneoplasiafocusonhistologicaldiscrepanciesbetweenbiopsyandresectedspecimens |