Cargando…
How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment
OBJECTIVE: Communities are important settings for health promotion and prevention. The community readiness assessment offers a structured approach to assess resources and opportunities to tackle a health problem within a community. The assessment relies on semi-structured interviews with key informa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9 |
_version_ | 1783662217780002816 |
---|---|
author | Muellmann, Saskia Brand, Tilman Jürgens, Dorothee Gansefort, Dirk Zeeb, Hajo |
author_facet | Muellmann, Saskia Brand, Tilman Jürgens, Dorothee Gansefort, Dirk Zeeb, Hajo |
author_sort | Muellmann, Saskia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Communities are important settings for health promotion and prevention. The community readiness assessment offers a structured approach to assess resources and opportunities to tackle a health problem within a community. The assessment relies on semi-structured interviews with key informants from the communities. A number of 4–6 key informant interviews are recommended in the literature. However, it is unclear whether this is sufficient to obtain a valid representation of the respective community. This study analysed whether increasing the number of key informants from 4–6 to 12–15 alters the results of the community readiness assessment. RESULTS: A total of 55 community readiness interviews were carried out in 4 communities. Overall, the community readiness scores showed little variation after having interviewed 10 key informants in a community. However, even after completing 10 interviews in a community, key informants were still able to identify up to 6 new information items regarding community efforts for physical activity promotion among the elderly, contact and communication channel for informing or approaching the target group, or barriers to participation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7941941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79419412021-03-09 How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment Muellmann, Saskia Brand, Tilman Jürgens, Dorothee Gansefort, Dirk Zeeb, Hajo BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Communities are important settings for health promotion and prevention. The community readiness assessment offers a structured approach to assess resources and opportunities to tackle a health problem within a community. The assessment relies on semi-structured interviews with key informants from the communities. A number of 4–6 key informant interviews are recommended in the literature. However, it is unclear whether this is sufficient to obtain a valid representation of the respective community. This study analysed whether increasing the number of key informants from 4–6 to 12–15 alters the results of the community readiness assessment. RESULTS: A total of 55 community readiness interviews were carried out in 4 communities. Overall, the community readiness scores showed little variation after having interviewed 10 key informants in a community. However, even after completing 10 interviews in a community, key informants were still able to identify up to 6 new information items regarding community efforts for physical activity promotion among the elderly, contact and communication channel for informing or approaching the target group, or barriers to participation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9. BioMed Central 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7941941/ /pubmed/33750436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Muellmann, Saskia Brand, Tilman Jürgens, Dorothee Gansefort, Dirk Zeeb, Hajo How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment |
title | How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment |
title_full | How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment |
title_fullStr | How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment |
title_short | How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment |
title_sort | how many key informants are enough? analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muellmannsaskia howmanykeyinformantsareenoughanalysingthevalidityofthecommunityreadinessassessment AT brandtilman howmanykeyinformantsareenoughanalysingthevalidityofthecommunityreadinessassessment AT jurgensdorothee howmanykeyinformantsareenoughanalysingthevalidityofthecommunityreadinessassessment AT gansefortdirk howmanykeyinformantsareenoughanalysingthevalidityofthecommunityreadinessassessment AT zeebhajo howmanykeyinformantsareenoughanalysingthevalidityofthecommunityreadinessassessment |